The Shadowy Art of Ministerial Appointments

In Queensland’s public service, a quiet game is underway – one that involves more than just policy and politics. Behind closed doors, ministerial advisors are weighing up the merits of various candidates for key roles within the bureaucracy. These appointments have significant sway over government agencies, policy implementation, and even high-profile projects.

Jarrod Bleijie’s next right-hand man is a position that has garnered attention in recent weeks. The deputy premier quipped about the “many capable individuals” who could fill the role when asked about his intentions. However, insiders point to David Mackie as a prime candidate for this position. Mackie shares a history with Bleijie from their time in the Newman-era attorney-general’s office and even had his wedding officiated by Bleijie.

The annual reports highlight significant pay packages awarded to senior officials atop various departments, including the Public Sector Commissioner and State Development roles. With his substantial experience, would Mackie be swayed by such benefits or prefer the daily challenges of managing the economic engine room of the state government? Only time will tell.

Other names have been floated for consideration, including Graham Fraine, current boss of Natural Resources and Mines, and Chris Lamont, who has taken over Customer Services from Premier and Cabinet. Former Brisbane councillor-turned-federal Liberal MP-turned-state property developer Julian Simmonds is also on the list, though his inclusion may be seen as too bold given Premier David Crisafulli’s past comments on partisan picks.

The method of appointment raises questions: Will Bleijie opt for an internal candidate or look externally? The latter approach was recommended in the 1989 Fitzgerald Inquiry report to ensure impartiality. However, history suggests adherence has been inconsistent at best.

In contrast, Michael Drane’s recent direct appointment as permanent Youth Justice chief reflects a more merit-based approach. His credentials were deemed sufficient to withstand assessment and suitability checks for handpicked candidates. This contrasts with previous instances where two directors had left the role before him.

The public sector’s reliance on ministerial whims rather than external recruitment has led some to question the impartiality of key appointments. This issue extends beyond mere speculation, touching on the heart of governance in Queensland, where policy implementation is often influenced by those closest to power.