Giving Marjorie Taylor Greene a platform isn't good for America

Giving Marjorie Taylor Greene a Platform Isn’t Good for America: Why the 60 Minutes Interview Was a Misstep

Marjorie Taylor Greene, a Republican congresswoman from Georgia, recently sat down with Lesley Stahl of CBS's 60 Minutes for an interview that was touted as a rare opportunity to hear her unfiltered opinions. However, it quickly became apparent that this was not just another conversation with a provocative guest, but rather a chance for the network to amplify Greene's divisive and extremist views.

Just last year, Greene sparked widespread outrage after attending a white nationalist event organized by Holocaust denier Nick Fuentes, which prompted Republican leaders to condemn her. And in February, her Twitter account was temporarily suspended over a tweet with a graphic referencing "Trans Day of Vengeance," further demonstrating her tendency to use hate speech to stoke division.

Despite this history of inflammatory behavior, 60 Minutes chose to feature Greene on their show, and the results were predictable. Stahl failed to adequately criticize Greene's views or bring any sense of nuance to the conversation, instead opting for a sympathetic ear that allowed Greene to spout off without interruption.

Greene used the interview as an opportunity to promote her conspiracy theories about school shootings, the 2020 election, and even her own involvement in the January 6 insurrection. She also made no effort to address criticisms of her past behavior or to demonstrate any genuine understanding of the issues she was discussing.

The decision to air this interview was widely criticized by journalists and activists alike, who argued that it only served to amplify Greene's hateful rhetoric and give her a platform to spread her extremist views even further. It's hard to think of another guest on 60 Minutes whose views have been so thoroughly discredited by experts and the public.

The interview also brought up uncomfortable comparisons with Les Moonves, the former CBS CEO who infamously said that President Donald Trump was "damn good" for CBS during his presidential campaign. While Moonves is no longer at the helm of the network, it's clear that some things haven't changed. The willingness to give a platform to extremist figures like Greene is still seen as a way to boost ratings and attract attention, even if it comes at the cost of perpetuating hate speech and division.

Ultimately, the decision to feature Marjorie Taylor Greene on 60 Minutes was a misstep that only served to further polarize the country. It's time for networks like CBS to think more critically about who they're giving airtime to and whether their actions are truly in the best interests of America.

I'm just worried that by giving Marjorie Taylor Greene a platform, we're inadvertently fueling the fire of hate speech and division in our country. It's like we're giving her a megaphone to spread her conspiracy theories and it only serves to further alienate people who are already feeling marginalized or disenfranchised. I wish networks like 60 Minutes would take a step back and think about the impact of their decisions on our society as a whole . We need more thoughtful, nuanced conversations that bring people together instead of tearing them apart .

I'm still trying to wrap my head around why 60 Minutes decided to give Marjorie Taylor Greene a platform She's been all over the news for being super divisive and promoting some really nasty stuff, and I just don't get why they thought it was a good idea to let her talk shop on their show again. I mean, we've seen her at white nationalist events and making hate speech comments on Twitter - what does she have to say that's gonna bring America together? It feels like CBS is just trying to boost ratings by giving us a dose of drama, but honestly, it's not doing anyone any good. We should be promoting more civil conversations and less hate-filled rhetoric. I'm all for letting people express themselves, but there's a fine line between opinion and extremism...

I'm low-key livid that 60 Minutes would give Marjorie Taylor Greene a platform . Like, I get it, she's got opinions, but have you seen her Twitter history? It's like she's trying to stir up a hornet's nest . And don't even get me started on how Stahl didn't call her out for being a total conspiracy theorist . Newsflash, 60 Minutes: just because you're giving her a platform doesn't mean you have to pretend she's not a hot mess.

And honestly, I'm still trying to wrap my head around why they thought it was a good idea to air this interview . Like, do they really think that amplifying hate speech is going to boost ratings? It's just gonna give the haters something to be mad about . Next thing you know, they'll be giving a platform to Alex Jones or something .

We need networks like CBS to start thinking more critically about who they're putting on their show and whether it's actually going to contribute to the conversation instead of just stirring up drama . Until then, I'm just gonna be over here, shaking my head and wondering what's wrong with these people .

I gotta say, I'm really disappointed in 60 Minutes decision to give Marjorie Taylor Greene a platform . I mean, we all know she's got some pretty extremist views that can be hurtful and divisive . And what really gets me is that they didn't do their due diligence on her past behavior or try to bring some nuance to the conversation .

It feels like they just wanted to give her a soapbox to spout off from, which isn't exactly what we need more of in this country . We're already seeing so much hate speech and division out there, it's hard to know what's real and what's not anymore .

I think networks like 60 Minutes need to be thinking way more critically about who they're giving airtime to and whether their actions are truly serving the American people . We deserve better than just a platform for someone to spread hate and conspiracy theories .

I'm tellin' ya, it's crazy what's goin' on with Marjorie Taylor Greene. I mean, she's already got a history of sayin' some pretty wild stuff, but that 60 Minutes interview just gave her a whole new platform to spread her hate speech. It's like they're just tryin' to get a rise outta people, ya know? And let's be real, Lesley Stahl could've called her out on some of that stuff. I mean, she's been doin' this for years and we all know how she rolls. It was like she was just waitin' for Greene to say somethin' crazy so she could nod along and say "oh yeah, well."

And what really gets me is that they're tryin' to make a buck off of her divisive views. I mean, who wants to watch someone spout conspiracy theories all day? Not me, that's for sure! It just feels like they're more interested in gettin' ratings than doin' some real journalism.

I remember when I was younger and stuff like this used to happen on the news. It'd be all "shock" value, you know? But now it just feels like business as usual. We need some people at 60 Minutes who are gonna stand up for what's right, not just tryin' to make a quick buck off of someone's hate speech.

I'm totally confused why 60 Minutes would give Marjorie Taylor Greene a platform like that . I mean, we all know her history of promoting hate speech and conspiracy theories... it's not like she's a moderate or anything . And yeah, Lesley Stahl should've called her out on some of the crazy stuff she was spouting... instead she just let her talk . It's like they wanted to boost ratings by giving her a free pass . Newsflash: it didn't work! Now we're all just stuck listening to her divisive nonsense . Can't networks be more careful about who they feature?

I just saw this thread pop up and I'm still trying to process how 60 Minutes could be so reckless . Giving a platform to someone as extreme as Marjorie Taylor Greene is just begging for more division and hate speech. Like, what was Lesley Stahl thinking? She basically let Greene spew her conspiracy theories and misinformation without any pushback or fact-checking.

And can we talk about how this interview is just a slap in the face to all the journalists who actually work hard to hold people in power accountable? It's like CBS is saying, "Hey, we're not going to hold your feet to the fire if you're willing to give us ratings." Newsflash: spreading hate and misinformation isn't good for America .

I'm so done with the way news networks are just sucking up attention at the expense of spreading hate . 60 Minutes is supposed to be a reputable source, but by giving Marjorie Taylor Greene a platform, they're basically validating her extremist views and giving them more airtime . It's not about fairness or balance – it's about ratings, plain and simple . And honestly, I'm tired of having to sift through all the fake news and sensationalism just to find something that actually matters . Can't we just have a platform where people with actual solutions and facts come together?

I'm so worried what other crazy stuff she spewed during that interview lol . I mean, I know 60 Minutes is trying to get those clicks but geez, can't they see how divisive this woman is? Her conspiracy theories are straight out of a bad movie and it's not like the public needs more of that nonsense. I'm surprised they didn't fact-check her or anything... what a complete joke. The network's just trying to boost ratings, no doubt about it . It's all about who gets interviewed these days. What's next? Giving a platform to Alex Jones?

I don't think it's a good idea for news outlets to give a platform to people with views that are so far out of touch with reality. Greene's history of spreading hate speech and conspiracy theories is well-documented, and it's not like she's going to change her ways just because she got interviewed on TV . It feels like networks are more interested in ratings than actually promoting critical thinking and nuance. And let's be real, who needs that kind of negativity in their life?

I'm so done with networks trying to boost ratings by giving platforms to people who spread hate . Marjorie Taylor Greene is a perfect example - her views are just plain toxic and she uses them to stir up division and fear . 60 Minutes should know better than to give her a platform like that, especially after all the controversy surrounding her last year's white nationalist event . It's not about giving people airtime for "opinions" when it comes at the cost of perpetuating hate speech and hurtful rhetoric . I mean, can't we do better than that? We need to support networks that stand up for what's right and promote respectful conversation . This interview was a huge misstep and I'm still trying to process why they didn't just say no to it .

I was thinking about this interview and I'm still trying to figure out why 60 Minutes thought it was a good idea to give Marjorie Taylor Greene a platform again . I mean, come on, she's been around the block a few times with her crazy conspiracy theories and hate speech . And don't even get me started on how she used this interview to promote all that nonsense .

I know some people might say it was just a way for the network to boost ratings or attract attention, but I think there's more to it than that . It feels like they were just looking for someone to stir up controversy and get people talking . But at what cost? We're already living in a time where hate speech is on the rise and we need networks to be using their platform to promote understanding and inclusivity, not division and extremism .

It's like, Lesley Stahl should have been holding Greene accountable for her views instead of just giving her a sympathetic ear . And what about all the people who were hurt by Greene's past behavior? Shouldn't they be given a chance to share their story on that platform too?

I don't know, maybe I'm just missing something . But it feels like 60 Minutes made a mistake here and we're all paying the price for it .

omg I'm so done with this 60 Minutes decision to give Marjorie Taylor Greene a platform it's just another way for them to boost ratings and make bank off her drama Like, come on! Can't they see she's just spreading hate and division? It's like they're fueling the fire that's already burning out of control in our country And what really gets me is that Lesley Stahl didn't even do her due diligence to fact-check Greene's wild conspiracy theories I mean, how hard is it to keep her from spewing venom? The comparison to Les Moonves is SO on point though It just goes to show that some things haven't changed in the media world and it's all about ratings over responsibility

I'm so worried about this . Marjorie Taylor Greene's interview on 60 Minutes was super problematic, you know? I mean, they gave her a platform and let her spew out all these crazy conspiracy theories without any pushback from Lesley Stahl. It was like she just got away with it . And for what? So they could get more views and attract attention? It's not worth it . I think networks need to be way more careful about who they feature on their shows, especially when it comes to people with a history of spreading hate speech and extremism. We can't just give them airtime without holding them accountable . And honestly, it feels like we're just seeing the same old thing here - prioritizing ratings over responsibility .

I don't get it, why did 60 Minutes think it was a good idea to give Marjorie Taylor Greene a platform? Like, she's got some seriously crazy views on school shootings and election conspiracies And Stahl just lets her spout off without even trying to fact-check her or hold her accountable. It feels like the network is more concerned with getting ratings than actually having an intelligent conversation. And what's up with the way they framed the whole thing? "Rare opportunity" to hear her unfiltered opinions? More like a chance for them to amplify her hate speech and watch it blow up on social media

OMG, y'all I'm literally shook by 60 Minutes' decision to give Marjorie Taylor Greene a platform She's been making waves with her racist & conspiracy-spewing tweets for ages & yet they still chose to air this interview It's like they're playing right into the hands of her radical fans And honestly, I'm still trying to process how Stahl didn't grill her harder about her history of promoting hate speech The network should've done better research on Greene & considered the potential consequences of amplifying her views Instead, they just let her spew more venom & misinformation It's gonna take a lot to regain trust after this one

I don't really get why they did that interview with Marjorie Taylor Greene . Like, isn't it her job to say crazy stuff? I mean, I saw some of those tweets she was talking about on Twitter and I'm just like... what is wrong with people these days? And can someone explain to me how 60 Minutes just lets that happen without questioning her at all? It's not like they're trying to help her or anything, it's just like... giving a platform to hate speech. That doesn't seem right to me .

you know what's crazy, i just saw this new game on my phone that's literally so addictive it's like, you start playing and then you can't stop until you've beaten all the levels... anyway, back to marjorie taylor greene... i mean, can't we just focus on real issues instead of spreading hate speech all over the place? like, what's really going on in our country that needs to be discussed? and honestly, 60 minutes should've done more research on her before giving her a platform... or maybe they were just trying to boost ratings

I'm so done with this . Can't we just choose not to give a platform to people who spread hate and misinformation? It's not that hard, 60 Minutes should've known better than to give Marjorie Taylor Greene an interview without really questioning her views first. It's all about ratings, I guess. They're basically saying "Hey, let's give this lady airtime so we can watch her be even more divisive and hate-filled". And honestly, it only makes things worse for the country . We need to think about the impact of our actions and not just try to get clicks or views. It's time for networks to start taking responsibility for what they're promoting on their shows .