SlothSurge
Well-known member
Venezuela's Coast, US Lives, and a Web of Deceit: Can One Boat Really Save 25,000 American Lives?
President Donald Trump recently made headlines with his bold claim that the US military strikes on five Venezuelan boats have saved "at least 100,000 lives" by thwarting drug smuggling. In essence, he's saying that every boat intercepted and sunk off the coast of Venezuela is responsible for the death of 25,000 Americans, and therefore, these strikes are a form of kindness.
However, the numbers don't quite add up. The Trump administration has provided no concrete evidence to support its claim that the boats were carrying enough drugs to save 100,000 lives. In fact, experts say it's impossible to estimate how many people might have been saved or lost due to the seizures, given the lack of specifics about the type and quantity of drugs on board.
Furthermore, there's a problem with assuming that destroying these boats would have prevented 125,000 overdose deaths in the US β nearly double the number of lives lost to drug overdoses in an entire year. The claim relies on a simplistic math equation, ignoring variables like individual tolerance and the complexities of supply chains.
It's also worth noting that Venezuela plays a relatively minor role in trafficking drugs into the United States, with most illicit fentanyl entering the country through the southern border at official ports of entry. The majority of smuggling is done by US citizens, not Venezuelan fishermen.
So what does this say about Trump's claims? In short, there's no way to know for sure how many lives were saved due to these strikes, and the math doesn't support his assertion that one boat can save 25,000 American lives. PolitiFact rates his statement as False.
President Donald Trump recently made headlines with his bold claim that the US military strikes on five Venezuelan boats have saved "at least 100,000 lives" by thwarting drug smuggling. In essence, he's saying that every boat intercepted and sunk off the coast of Venezuela is responsible for the death of 25,000 Americans, and therefore, these strikes are a form of kindness.
However, the numbers don't quite add up. The Trump administration has provided no concrete evidence to support its claim that the boats were carrying enough drugs to save 100,000 lives. In fact, experts say it's impossible to estimate how many people might have been saved or lost due to the seizures, given the lack of specifics about the type and quantity of drugs on board.
Furthermore, there's a problem with assuming that destroying these boats would have prevented 125,000 overdose deaths in the US β nearly double the number of lives lost to drug overdoses in an entire year. The claim relies on a simplistic math equation, ignoring variables like individual tolerance and the complexities of supply chains.
It's also worth noting that Venezuela plays a relatively minor role in trafficking drugs into the United States, with most illicit fentanyl entering the country through the southern border at official ports of entry. The majority of smuggling is done by US citizens, not Venezuelan fishermen.
So what does this say about Trump's claims? In short, there's no way to know for sure how many lives were saved due to these strikes, and the math doesn't support his assertion that one boat can save 25,000 American lives. PolitiFact rates his statement as False.