Germany's Mainstream Parties Accidentally Fuel Far Right Agenda
In a striking study, researchers in Germany have found that mainstream parties are inadvertently allowing the far right to dictate the agenda, a phenomenon with significant implications for democracy. Analyzing over 520,000 articles from six German newspapers spanning nearly two decades, the research reveals how mainstream parties' responses to far-right ideas have boosted their dissemination and legitimized them among voters.
The study's findings suggest that as the far right transitioned from fringe issues in the late 1990s to more mainstream topics like integration and migration, mainstream parties began to mirror its language and rhetoric. This normalization effect has enabled the far right to set the tone on cultural issues, making it increasingly difficult for moderate voices to be heard.
The researchers discovered that even when mainstream parties are criticizing the far right, they often inadvertently amplify its ideas by giving them attention. This "battle for attention" is crucial in shaping public perception and influencing voter behavior, according to Teresa VΓΆlker, co-author of the study. "You're still giving them attention," she noted. "Our core argument is that because we live in such a battle for attention, this attention is key."
The study's impact extends beyond Germany, with Daniel Saldivia Gonzatti, co-author, suggesting that similar normalization effects can be observed across Europe, particularly in German and British media. The far right's ability to dictate the agenda has created an "echo chamber" where moderate parties are forced to respond to its ideas rather than setting their own discourse.
In Germany, leaders have even adopted the language of the far right, with Olaf Scholz, then-German chancellor, proposing deportations on a large scale. This phenomenon is not unique to Germany, as politicians across Europe, including in the UK and France, have adopted the language of the far right on migration and integration issues.
The researchers argue that mainstream parties must take responsibility for setting their own discourses, particularly on sensitive topics like migration and integration. If they continue to trail behind the far right, they risk losing control over the narrative and inadvertently fueling its agenda.
"This is like a dance," said Saldivia Gonzatti. "If the conductor is far-right and you're reacting to it, you cannot decide which music should be playing." The study's findings highlight the urgent need for mainstream parties to reclaim their discourses and resist the normalization effect of the far right.
In a striking study, researchers in Germany have found that mainstream parties are inadvertently allowing the far right to dictate the agenda, a phenomenon with significant implications for democracy. Analyzing over 520,000 articles from six German newspapers spanning nearly two decades, the research reveals how mainstream parties' responses to far-right ideas have boosted their dissemination and legitimized them among voters.
The study's findings suggest that as the far right transitioned from fringe issues in the late 1990s to more mainstream topics like integration and migration, mainstream parties began to mirror its language and rhetoric. This normalization effect has enabled the far right to set the tone on cultural issues, making it increasingly difficult for moderate voices to be heard.
The researchers discovered that even when mainstream parties are criticizing the far right, they often inadvertently amplify its ideas by giving them attention. This "battle for attention" is crucial in shaping public perception and influencing voter behavior, according to Teresa VΓΆlker, co-author of the study. "You're still giving them attention," she noted. "Our core argument is that because we live in such a battle for attention, this attention is key."
The study's impact extends beyond Germany, with Daniel Saldivia Gonzatti, co-author, suggesting that similar normalization effects can be observed across Europe, particularly in German and British media. The far right's ability to dictate the agenda has created an "echo chamber" where moderate parties are forced to respond to its ideas rather than setting their own discourse.
In Germany, leaders have even adopted the language of the far right, with Olaf Scholz, then-German chancellor, proposing deportations on a large scale. This phenomenon is not unique to Germany, as politicians across Europe, including in the UK and France, have adopted the language of the far right on migration and integration issues.
The researchers argue that mainstream parties must take responsibility for setting their own discourses, particularly on sensitive topics like migration and integration. If they continue to trail behind the far right, they risk losing control over the narrative and inadvertently fueling its agenda.
"This is like a dance," said Saldivia Gonzatti. "If the conductor is far-right and you're reacting to it, you cannot decide which music should be playing." The study's findings highlight the urgent need for mainstream parties to reclaim their discourses and resist the normalization effect of the far right.