Battlefield 6 is yet another cliche-ridden war game. We deserve better

Battlefield 6 feels like more of the same tired, unoriginal war game formula that we've come to expect from the long-running series. The single-player campaign is a predictable and overly familiar tale of heroes fighting against evil forces, with characters that are little more than cardboard cutouts with no depth or backstory.

The real fun lies in the multiplayer mode, where dozens of players can engage in massive online battles involving tanks, aircraft, and troops. It's thrilling, epic, and compulsive - exactly what we've come to expect from Battlefield.

But what's missing is any genuine narrative innovation or attempt at making a meaningful statement about modern warfare. The game's attempts at exploring the complexities of war are shallow and lack any real substance. Instead, we're left with a generic, cliched story that feels like it was ripped straight from the pages of a bad action movie.

This isn't the first time Battlefield has relied on its multiplayer mode to carry the series forward. In fact, most games in the series have abandoned single-player campaigns altogether, leaving developers to focus on creating engaging online experiences.

It's worth noting that there are other games out there that have managed to tackle complex themes like war and its effects on individuals in a more meaningful way. Games like Spec Ops: The Line, which explores the psychological impact of war on soldiers, or Valiant Hearts, which tells the story of love and loss during wartime.

If Battlefield 6 wants to shake things up and offer something new, it needs to take a risk and try something different. It can't just rely on the same old formula that's worked for so long. The games industry is constantly evolving, and audiences are becoming increasingly sophisticated when it comes to what they want from their entertainment.

Ultimately, Battlefield 6 feels like more of the same tired war game that we've grown all too familiar with. If you're looking for something new and innovative in the genre, you might want to look elsewhere.

I'm so over these annual 'updates' to our beloved war games . I mean, can't they just shake things up a bit? Battlefield 6 feels like Groundhog Day for gamers who've been conditioned to expect the same formulaic experience every year. We're not kids anymore, we want substance! What's the point of even having single-player campaigns if it's just going to be some generic tale of 'good guys vs evil' . And don't even get me started on the lack of depth in characters - cardboard cutouts are so last gen .

Meanwhile, other games like Spec Ops: The Line and Valiant Hearts are tackling real issues with war's psychological impact and its effects on individuals . We need more games that speak to our hearts, not just provide a shallow, action-packed experience . Battlefield 6 needs to take a risk, innovate, and offer something new - if it wants to stay relevant in this ever-evolving gaming landscape .

i feel me too about battlefield series its been doing the same thing for years now multiplayer is always fire but singleplayer just feels like meh no depth no story nothin. if ur gonna make a war game u gotta put in the work and try somethin new

omg i just got my hands on battlefield 6 multiplayer its so much fun but like... whats up with the single player tho? its like they forgot how to make a decent story lol what happened to those games that made u think about the actual effects of war like spec ops or valiant hearts idk maybe im just not good at warfare or something

I'm kinda with this guy , I mean Battlefield has been doing the same thing for years now and it's just getting old . The single-player campaign is so predictable it's like watching a slideshow of cliches . Don't get me wrong multiplayer is still fun but it's not enough to carry the whole game .

I'm thinking maybe EA should take some notes from those games that actually tackle complex themes, you know, the ones that make you think ? Like Spec Ops or Valiant Hearts... those are games that leave a mark on you . Battlefield 6 needs to step up its A-game if it wants to compete with the likes of Call of Duty and Halo

so battlefield 6 just feels like another iteration of the same old formula right? i mean multiplayer is still a blast but single-player is just kinda meh what's up with that? can't they make it more meaningful or something? it's like they're just phoning it in i think there are other games out there that tackle complex themes better, like spec ops or valiant hearts. maybe battlefield should take a risk and try something new?

I'm SO UNDERWHELMED BY THE NEW BATTLEFIELD GAME!!! IT FEELS LIKE THEY JUST PHONED IN ANOTHER FORMULAIC WAR GAME WITHOUT ANY REAL DEPTH OR SUBSTANCE!!! I MEAN DON'T GET ME WRONG, MULTIPLAYER IS ALWAYS A BLAST BUT COME ON, CAN'T WE HAVE SOMETHING MORE THAN JUST TANKS AND TROOPS RUNNING AROUND?! THE STORY LINE FEELS LIKE IT WAS STOLEN FROM A BAD ACTION MOVIE

ugh i feel u battlefield 6 is just so predictable. i mean how many times can u reuse the same old multiplayer formula before it gets stale? and dont even get me started on the single player campaign lol its like they just phoned it in this time around. idk man, im all for a good war game but battlefield needs to step up their A-game if they wanna stay relevant

anyway i think what bothers me most is that games like spec ops and valiant hearts are doing so much more with the theme of war than battlefield ever will

I'm just so over these big-budget games relying on the same old formula over and over . Battlefield 6 is no exception - it's like they're stuck in a time loop, regurgitating the same tired storylines and gameplay mechanics that we've seen for years now . And don't even get me started on how shallow their attempts at exploring complex themes are... I mean, come on, can't you just make a game about war without resorting to cliches? The multiplayer mode is okay, I guess, but it's not enough to carry the entire game. We need more innovation and risk-taking from devs, or we're gonna be stuck in this rut forever

I gotta say I'm a bit disappointed in Battlefield 6 . It's like they took everything that made the series great about multiplayer and just amplified it... but left single-player feeling stale . Don't get me wrong, massive online battles are still super fun , but can't we have more depth to the story? Like, I've seen better-written lines on a video game forum . It's like they're trying to make us forget all about the single-player campaign. What happened to taking risks and pushing boundaries? The only games that do it right are the indie ones... but they don't have the same kinda following . Battlefield 6 feels like just more of the same, you know?

battlefield 6 just feels like more of the same, you know? I mean multiplayer is still fire, but single-player campaign is so predictable it's almost boring . I love how devs are leaning on that for the series' future, tho . We need some innovation here! games like spec ops and valiant hearts do it way better, exploring real themes & emotions not just another generic war story

ugh i feel me again playing battlefield 6 multiplayer is so lit but single-player campaign is straight outta a bad action flick i mean where's the depth in the story? it just feels like the devs are phoning it in anyways the thing that gets me is why can't they innovate or make a statement about modern warfare? games like spec ops: the line and valiant hearts do it way better they tackle the complexities of war and its effects on soldiers and people's lives battlefield 6 needs to take some risks if it wants to stay relevant

I dunno about this one ... I mean, I love a good multiplayer session as much as the next guy, but it's just so... same old same old . Can't they think outside the box for once? I get that maybe the single-player campaign isn't their strong suit, but can't they at least try to add some depth to the story or something? It feels like they're just phoning it in this time around.

And don't even get me started on how generic all the stories are these days . I mean, come on, we've seen so many of the same old tropes and plot twists before. Where's the originality? Games like Spec Ops: The Line and Valiant Hearts do a way better job of exploring complex themes in a meaningful way.

I guess what I'm saying is, if you're gonna put out a game that's part of this big franchise, you gotta bring your A-game . Otherwise, it just feels like more of the same old thing. Maybe Battlefield 6 should try to shake things up a bit and take some risks?

Honestly, i'm kinda disappointed in battlefield 6 . The multiplayer mode is still super fun and all, but single-player campaign feels like a rehash of every other game in the series. i mean, where's the depth in the story? it's just some generic hero vs villain nonsense. devs need to take risks and try something new, you know? there are games out there that tackle complex themes like war in a more meaningful way. if battlefield 6 wants to stand out, they should try to do that . i'm still gonna play it though, lol.

lol i played battlefield 5 last year and it was so meh the multiplayer is where it's at but single player feels like just a bunch of scripted scenes with no depth whatsoever anyone else feel like they've seen this same story before? spec ops: the line is still my fave game on this genre btw [https://www.gameinformer.com/2023/1...mer.com/2023/11/10/battlefield-6-beta-review)

I mean, come on, another year another Battlefield game that's just more of the same old thing... I get it, multiplayer is where it's at for this series, don't get me wrong, but can't we have a bit more depth in the single-player story? It feels like they're just phoning it in at this point. And what's with the lack of originality? It's like they're playing it safe and not wanting to rock the boat. I'm all for trying new things, but sometimes you gotta take a risk and push boundaries. This game feels like a cop-out.

idk wut's up wit battlefield 6 tho? i mean, multiplayer sounds lit but single player is just so boring i remember playin' spec ops: the line on ps3 & it was like, wow... it actually made me think about war . and valiant hearts was so beautiful too . battlefield 6 needs to step up its game if it wants 2 b taken seriously . i dunno wut they r doin' rite now tho?

idk why devs still go for same old formula... battlefield 6 just rehashes what worked 10 yrs ago multiplayer is fun, don't get me wrong, but single-player needs some love too... it's like they forgot how to tell a compelling story games like spec ops and valiant hearts do it way better battlefield just feels like a watered down version of itself and yeah, devs need to step up their game if they wanna innovate

I mean, I'm not gonna lie, Battlefield 6 just feels like another iteration of the same old thing. I remember playing Battlefield 1942 back in the day, it was a game-changer. The multiplayer was insane, and you could really feel like you were in the midst of war. Now, it's all just...meh.

And don't even get me started on single-player campaigns. I mean, what happened to those? They used to be so epic and immersive, now they're just a bunch of cardboard cutouts with no real depth or backstory. It's like the devs are just phoning it in at this point.

I'm all for the multiplayer mode, don't get me wrong. It's still a blast, but it can't save the game from feeling so...predictable. I mean, we've seen it all before, and it's just not as exciting as it used to be.

You know what would be cool? If they took some cues from other games like Spec Ops or Valiant Hearts and actually tried to tackle some of the real issues with war. That would be something new and innovative for once.