Mississippi Residents Sue UK-Owned Biomass Firm Over Emissions Permit
Residents of Gloster, Mississippi have launched a lawsuit against Drax Biomass, the UK-based company behind a wood pellet production plant that was recently granted permission to increase emissions in the predominantly Black and low-income town. The permit allows the facility to emit hazardous air pollutants at levels exceeding those allowed by state law.
The decision comes after local residents reported suffering from health problems such as headaches and respiratory issues due to the plant's operation, which has been in place for over a decade. Drax Biomass supplies wood pellets to its massive power station in Selby, North Yorkshire, England, where it receives billions of pounds in UK renewable energy subsidies.
Critics claim that the wood used by Drax is not sustainably sourced, and the company was previously fined Β£25m ($33m) for supplying inaccurate data on biomass sourcing. The Financial Conduct Authority has also launched an investigation into the firm.
The lawsuit alleges that Drax's facility has exposed locals to excessive chemicals and pollutants, contaminating homes and putting residents at risk of diseases such as cancer and respiratory illness. Attorneys say the case aims to hold the company accountable for poisoning a small community.
"I've been living here my whole life," said Jimmy Brown, who lives less than a mile from the plant. "You got dust falling all night... It's nonstop."
Environmental advocates have long criticized the UK government's funding of Drax through renewable energy subsidies, accusing it of perpetuating "environmental racism." A recent letter to Mississippi's governor and environmental quality board expressed concern over the impact on residents and urged steps to ensure clean air.
The permit decision has sparked outrage among local residents, who claim that any plans for increased emissions could worsen health issues linked to pollutants. The outcome is a worrying sign for communities struggling with environmental degradation and corporate accountability.
Residents of Gloster, Mississippi have launched a lawsuit against Drax Biomass, the UK-based company behind a wood pellet production plant that was recently granted permission to increase emissions in the predominantly Black and low-income town. The permit allows the facility to emit hazardous air pollutants at levels exceeding those allowed by state law.
The decision comes after local residents reported suffering from health problems such as headaches and respiratory issues due to the plant's operation, which has been in place for over a decade. Drax Biomass supplies wood pellets to its massive power station in Selby, North Yorkshire, England, where it receives billions of pounds in UK renewable energy subsidies.
Critics claim that the wood used by Drax is not sustainably sourced, and the company was previously fined Β£25m ($33m) for supplying inaccurate data on biomass sourcing. The Financial Conduct Authority has also launched an investigation into the firm.
The lawsuit alleges that Drax's facility has exposed locals to excessive chemicals and pollutants, contaminating homes and putting residents at risk of diseases such as cancer and respiratory illness. Attorneys say the case aims to hold the company accountable for poisoning a small community.
"I've been living here my whole life," said Jimmy Brown, who lives less than a mile from the plant. "You got dust falling all night... It's nonstop."
Environmental advocates have long criticized the UK government's funding of Drax through renewable energy subsidies, accusing it of perpetuating "environmental racism." A recent letter to Mississippi's governor and environmental quality board expressed concern over the impact on residents and urged steps to ensure clean air.
The permit decision has sparked outrage among local residents, who claim that any plans for increased emissions could worsen health issues linked to pollutants. The outcome is a worrying sign for communities struggling with environmental degradation and corporate accountability.