81 More Women Join Civil Lawsuit Against Army Gynecologist Charged with Secretly Filming Patients
A total of 81 women have joined a civil lawsuit against Blaine McGraw, a US army gynecologist who was recently criminally charged in connection with secretly filming dozens of his patients during medical examinations. The lawsuit alleges that McGraw repeatedly inappropriately touched and covertly filmed dozens of women during appointments at an on-base medical center.
The allegations against McGraw have sparked widespread outrage, with many accusing him of subjecting his female patients to invasive, unnecessary, and degrading touching, voyeurism, and covert filming. Attorneys for the alleged victims claim that McGraw's actions were "intentionally and knowingly made harmful and offensive physical contact" during gynecological exams.
One woman who was a patient of McGraw's described an encounter during a rape-kit examination in which she suspects he took photos of her. According to the complaint, McGraw was constantly on his phone while between her legs, suggesting that he may have used his phone to photograph her during the exam.
The lawsuit also claims that McGraw "failed to document" the performance of a rape kit in one patient's medical records, which ultimately hindered prosecutors' ability to build a case against her assailant. The filing argues that McGraw's actions not only failed to protect a victim of sexual violence but actively undermined her access to justice and allowed her perpetrator to escape accountability.
The addition of 81 new plaintiffs brings the total number of women who have joined the lawsuit to at least 122. The civil suit is seeking damages for McGraw's alleged misconduct, which has sparked concerns about whether recent Pentagon reforms aimed at addressing sexual misconduct and supporting survivors are working as intended.
Experts and advocacy groups have expressed concern that the case may test the effectiveness of these reforms, with many questioning how they can be effective in preventing similar incidents from occurring in the future. As the investigation into McGraw's actions continues, it remains to be seen what other consequences he will face for his alleged misconduct.
A total of 81 women have joined a civil lawsuit against Blaine McGraw, a US army gynecologist who was recently criminally charged in connection with secretly filming dozens of his patients during medical examinations. The lawsuit alleges that McGraw repeatedly inappropriately touched and covertly filmed dozens of women during appointments at an on-base medical center.
The allegations against McGraw have sparked widespread outrage, with many accusing him of subjecting his female patients to invasive, unnecessary, and degrading touching, voyeurism, and covert filming. Attorneys for the alleged victims claim that McGraw's actions were "intentionally and knowingly made harmful and offensive physical contact" during gynecological exams.
One woman who was a patient of McGraw's described an encounter during a rape-kit examination in which she suspects he took photos of her. According to the complaint, McGraw was constantly on his phone while between her legs, suggesting that he may have used his phone to photograph her during the exam.
The lawsuit also claims that McGraw "failed to document" the performance of a rape kit in one patient's medical records, which ultimately hindered prosecutors' ability to build a case against her assailant. The filing argues that McGraw's actions not only failed to protect a victim of sexual violence but actively undermined her access to justice and allowed her perpetrator to escape accountability.
The addition of 81 new plaintiffs brings the total number of women who have joined the lawsuit to at least 122. The civil suit is seeking damages for McGraw's alleged misconduct, which has sparked concerns about whether recent Pentagon reforms aimed at addressing sexual misconduct and supporting survivors are working as intended.
Experts and advocacy groups have expressed concern that the case may test the effectiveness of these reforms, with many questioning how they can be effective in preventing similar incidents from occurring in the future. As the investigation into McGraw's actions continues, it remains to be seen what other consequences he will face for his alleged misconduct.