Federal Appeal Court Upholds Trump's National Guard Deployment in Portland Amid Ongoing Protests.
The 9th US Circuit Court of Appeals has ruled in favor of President Donald Trump, allowing him to deploy Oregon National Guard troops into the city of Portland. The decision marks a significant victory for the Trump administration as it continues its effort to send federal forces into Democratic-led cities despite recent setbacks.
In a 2-1 ruling, the court's majority found that Trump lawfully exercised his statutory authority under 10 US Code ยง 12406(3) when deploying National Guard troops. Judge Ryan Nelson and Judge Bridget Bade, both appointed by Trump, sided with the administration in the majority ruling, while Clinton-appointed Judge Susan Graber dissented.
The deployment has become a contentious issue, with protesters opposing Trump's key policies clashing with law enforcement. Oregon officials and civil liberties groups have argued that the administration is exaggerating the threat, while Trump allies claim the Guard is necessary to restore order.
In an earlier ruling, a federal judge in Oregon had temporarily blocked Trump's attempt to deploy troops, describing his action as "untethered from reality" and risking "blurring the line between civil and military power." However, the 9th US Circuit Court of Appeals agreed to hear the administration's appeal, which was quickly stayed pending review.
The ruling comes amid Trump's efforts to deploy hundreds of National Guard troops into Democratic-led cities, citing concerns over violent crime and threats from protesters. Democrats have countered that Trump's descriptions are hyperbolic and inaccurate, arguing that the deployment is a pretext for federalizing Democratic-led cities.
With the 9th US Circuit Court's decision, the burden remains on lower courts to navigate this high-profile case. The 7th US Circuit Court of Appeals has also weighed in on the dispute, partially lifting a lower court order blocking Trump's federal deployment of National Guard troops in Chicago.
The Trump administration has asked the Supreme Court to intervene and block a 7th Circuit ruling that blocked its efforts for now. As the appeals continue, protests in Portland remain a contentious issue, with demonstrators opposing Trump's policies and law enforcement working to maintain order.
The decision by the 9th US Circuit Court of Appeals underscores the ongoing tensions between the Trump administration and Democratic-led cities. The case highlights the challenges faced by courts in balancing the need for law and order with concerns over federal power and civil liberties.
The 9th US Circuit Court of Appeals has ruled in favor of President Donald Trump, allowing him to deploy Oregon National Guard troops into the city of Portland. The decision marks a significant victory for the Trump administration as it continues its effort to send federal forces into Democratic-led cities despite recent setbacks.
In a 2-1 ruling, the court's majority found that Trump lawfully exercised his statutory authority under 10 US Code ยง 12406(3) when deploying National Guard troops. Judge Ryan Nelson and Judge Bridget Bade, both appointed by Trump, sided with the administration in the majority ruling, while Clinton-appointed Judge Susan Graber dissented.
The deployment has become a contentious issue, with protesters opposing Trump's key policies clashing with law enforcement. Oregon officials and civil liberties groups have argued that the administration is exaggerating the threat, while Trump allies claim the Guard is necessary to restore order.
In an earlier ruling, a federal judge in Oregon had temporarily blocked Trump's attempt to deploy troops, describing his action as "untethered from reality" and risking "blurring the line between civil and military power." However, the 9th US Circuit Court of Appeals agreed to hear the administration's appeal, which was quickly stayed pending review.
The ruling comes amid Trump's efforts to deploy hundreds of National Guard troops into Democratic-led cities, citing concerns over violent crime and threats from protesters. Democrats have countered that Trump's descriptions are hyperbolic and inaccurate, arguing that the deployment is a pretext for federalizing Democratic-led cities.
With the 9th US Circuit Court's decision, the burden remains on lower courts to navigate this high-profile case. The 7th US Circuit Court of Appeals has also weighed in on the dispute, partially lifting a lower court order blocking Trump's federal deployment of National Guard troops in Chicago.
The Trump administration has asked the Supreme Court to intervene and block a 7th Circuit ruling that blocked its efforts for now. As the appeals continue, protests in Portland remain a contentious issue, with demonstrators opposing Trump's policies and law enforcement working to maintain order.
The decision by the 9th US Circuit Court of Appeals underscores the ongoing tensions between the Trump administration and Democratic-led cities. The case highlights the challenges faced by courts in balancing the need for law and order with concerns over federal power and civil liberties.