Adam Schiff confronted on polling showing overwhelming support for requiring photo ID to vote

A new poll suggests that the majority of Americans, 83%, support requiring photo ID to vote. However, Senator Adam Schiff claims this would disenfranchise certain voters. The liberal senator was confronted by ABC's Jonathan Karl about his stance on photo ID laws during an interview.

Schiff argued that requiring a photo ID at polling stations would be ineffective because millions of Americans do not possess such documents, including passports and birth certificates. He claimed it would "disenfranchise" people who lack these essential documents, even if they are U.S. citizens.

Karl had asked Schiff whether he would support requiring photo ID to vote. The senator stated that the bill would still disenfranchise certain voters but did not provide an alternative solution to implement voter ID laws effectively.

The Safeguard American Voter Eligibility Act (SAVE) has been compared to "Jim Crow 2.0" by Democrats, including Senate Minority Leader Chuck Schumer. This law aims to require photo ID when voting and has sparked controversy over its potential impact on voter suppression.

Schiff emphasized that the bill would not pass in the Senate without bipartisan support. He claimed that Republicans were trying to attack elections and suppress votes through other means, such as eliminating absentee ballot voting and mail-in registration options.

The latest poll indicates a significant divide between Democrats and Republicans on the issue of photo ID laws for voters.
 
idk why ppl are so against photo id lol πŸ€·β€β™‚οΈ i mean if u dont have a passport or bc its not ur problem, find another way to get 1 πŸ“Έ but seriously what's the big deal? its just one more thing to show ur identity before u vote? its like buying groceries, u gotta show ur card πŸ›οΈ and even then u can still complain about it. i think schiff is being a bit dramatic tbh
 
I gotta say, this whole voter ID thing is really got me thinking πŸ€”. I've had friends from all sides who are really passionate about it, you know? One side says it's necessary to prevent voter fraud (and I get that), but at the same time, it sounds like we're creating more obstacles for people who already have a hard time exercising their right to vote πŸ’”. Like, what if someone doesn't have an ID, but they are 100% legit? Shouldn't that be enough?

I'm also kinda worried about this "Jim Crow 2.0" label 🚨. I get why it's being used by Democrats to paint a negative picture, but at the same time, I think we need to have a more nuanced conversation about voter ID laws and how they might affect different groups of people.

I do think we need some common-sense solutions that make sense for everyone 🀝. Like, maybe there could be alternatives like voter registration drives or online ID applications? But at the same time, I don't want to see our elections become more complicated just to prevent a few bad apples from ruining the whole thing 🍎.
 
I'm torn about this whole thing... I mean, on one hand, you gotta ensure that people who are voting are actually who they say they are πŸ€”. But at the same time, some folks might not have the means to get a proper ID, and that's just not fair βš–οΈ. I don't think it's about disenfranchising anyone, but more about making sure everyone has equal access to voting... maybe there's a middle ground here? πŸ€·β€β™‚οΈ Like, what if you could get an ID for free or through some other means? πŸ€” It's all about finding that balance, you know? πŸ’‘
 
ID laws are a whole thing in the US rn πŸ€”. I mean, it's cool that 83% of Americans support 'em, but at the same time, you gotta wonder how people who don't have passports or birth certificates manage to vote... like, isn't there a way to verify their citizenship somehow? πŸ€·β€β™‚οΈ Schiff is right that requiring ID could disenfranchise some ppl, but on the other hand, you don't wanna let anyone just waltz in and cast a vote without proof. It's like, find a middle ground, you know? πŸ€” The Safeguard American Voter Eligibility Act thing seems like it's got a lot of controversy around it... both sides have valid points, but I feel like the whole "Jim Crow 2.0" vibe is a bit unfair... πŸ™„ What do u guys think about ID laws in the US? Should they be stricter or more relaxed? πŸ€·β€β™‚οΈ
 
I'm so done with politicians making empty promises πŸ™„. Like, come on Adam Schiff, you can't just say that photo ID laws are gonna disenfranchise people without having a plan B in place πŸ˜’. It's always something with these guys - "we're trying to protect the system" but really they're just trying to control it πŸ’―. And don't even get me started on how convenient it is for them to blame Republicans for everything πŸ€¦β€β™‚οΈ. Like, who are they kidding? They want to create more division and suppress votes so their precious "progressive" agenda can move forward 🚫. The whole "Jim Crow 2.0" thing from Schumer? Yeah, that's just good drama 🎭. It's always the same - politicians trying to manipulate the narrative for their own gain πŸ’Έ.
 
I'm like totally against this new bill that wants everyone to show their ID at the polling station πŸ€”. I mean think about it, what if you don't have an ID? What if your ID's expired or not even a passport? How are they gonna know who's really voting and who's not πŸ€‘. It sounds like a total setup for some voter suppression shenanigans. And let's be real, what's the point of even showing an ID? Can't we just trust that people are honest enough to vote πŸ€·β€β™€οΈ? It's like they're saying "we don't trust you" just 'cause you might not have a fancy ID πŸ”’.
 
I'm not sure I buy this whole "millions don't have passports or birth certificates" thing πŸ€”. Like, what's going on here? The US has a pretty robust system in place to track citizenship and identity. And if people are really that lost, shouldn't they be getting help from the government instead of being disenfranchised?

And then there's this whole " SAVE is like Jim Crow 2.0" thing πŸ™„. I get it, some folks are worried about voter suppression, but can we at least have a nuanced discussion about it? Not everything is just a simple case of "good vs evil". And what's with the lack of concrete evidence on how photo ID laws actually affect voter turnout?

I need to see more data on this one before I jump on either side of the fence πŸ“Š. It feels like we're getting caught up in party politics instead of having a real conversation about how to make voting work for everyone πŸ€·β€β™€οΈ.
 
I'm really worried about this whole voter ID thing πŸ€”πŸ—³οΈ. I mean, if 83% of Americans support it, that's like, most people agree on something, right? But at the same time, Senator Schiff is highlighting a super valid point - what about all these ppl who don't have passports or birth certificates?! It just doesn't make sense to force them to get one just to vote πŸ™„.

And I'm not buying into the "it's gonna disenfranchise people" narrative either. Like, we can find ways to make ID laws work without messing with peoples' voting rights, you know? It's all about finding that balance between security and equality. And honestly, I think we should be focusing on making voting more accessible, not harder 🚧. This whole "Jim Crow 2.0" thing is super concerning too... we need to keep pushing for real reforms, not just sticking with the status quo πŸ‘Š.
 
πŸ€”πŸ˜¬ This new poll is wild πŸ“Š 83% of Americans support ID at polls but Schumer calls it "Jim Crow 2.0" πŸ˜’ what's up with that? πŸ€·β€β™€οΈ I get that some people don't have IDs but think we gotta make voting harder than getting a library card πŸ“šπŸ‘Ž Schiff thinks it won't pass without bipartisan support 🀝 sounds good to me πŸ‘ wanna see the other side of this debate πŸ’¬
 
πŸ€” I mean, I get why some people are saying that having to show ID at the polls is gonna disenfranchise certain folks... but like, come on, if you're a US citizen, shouldn't you have some form of ID? πŸ“Έ And what's with the whole "millions don't have passports or birth certificates" thing? Like, isn't there like, a social security card or something? πŸ˜’

I also don't think it's entirely fair to say that photo ID laws are just another way for Republicans to suppress votes... I mean, can we at least consider the possibility that it might be a legit way to prevent voter fraud? πŸ€·β€β™€οΈ It's not like we haven't had problems with fake IDs before.

And honestly, if you're really concerned about disenfranchising people, maybe we should focus on making sure everyone has access to those essential documents in the first place? Like, instead of just complaining about photo ID laws... πŸ€“
 
I'm kinda surprised by this news πŸ€”, I mean, you'd think people would want to make sure everyone who votes is legit, right? But at the same time, I get why some folks are worried about it. Like, what if someone's trying to vote under a fake ID or something? It's all about finding that balance, you know? 🀝 I'm not saying I agree with Schiff's views on this one, but I can see where he's coming from too... maybe we could just try to figure out some alternative solutions that would work for everyone? πŸ€“
 
I'm not sure I agree with all the backlash against Adam Schiff's stance on photo ID laws πŸ€”. I mean, don't get me wrong, we gotta make sure everyone's legit voting right? But come on, some people don't have IDs and that's a problem, but do you really think requiring one at polling stations is gonna solve it? It's like, if someone's got an ID, they can get one if they need to. And what about expiring IDs, or people who can't afford to replace them? It seems to me like we're just tryin' to find ways to make voting harder for some folks... πŸ˜•
 
πŸ€” The more I think about it, the more I'm reminded that our democracy is built on a delicate balance between security and access. On one hand, requiring photo ID at polling stations makes sense from a security perspective - who wouldn't want to verify the identity of every voter? But on the other hand, there's a risk that this could disenfranchise people who are already struggling to navigate the system πŸ€¦β€β™€οΈ.

It's like the old saying goes: you can have your cake and eat it too. Do we really need to choose between security and access? Can't we find a middle ground where both are protected? I'm not sure, but one thing's for sure - this is a conversation that needs to be had πŸ—£οΈ.
 
πŸ€” I'm seeing this debate pop up all over again - remember when we were talking about voter suppression a few months ago? This whole photo ID thing just feels like another example of how polarized we are as a country πŸ€·β€β™€οΈ. Adam Schiff is right, though, that requiring ID would affect some people, but I don't think it's fair to say it would completely disenfranchise them. What if they already have the ID? Shouldn't we be trying to find ways to make voting easier for everyone, not just harder? πŸ€·β€β™‚οΈ The Safeguard American Voter Eligibility Act is a real concern, though - I'm not sure why Senate Minority Leader Schumer is comparing it to Jim Crow laws, but I guess that's just how passionate he is about this issue πŸ˜’. What do you guys think? Should photo ID be required at polling stations or is that just another way for Republicans to suppress votes? πŸ€”
 
Back
Top