April 3, 2023 Trump indictment news | CNN Politics

Trump's lawyers push back against media request to broadcast former President Donald Trump's arraignment, citing potential security concerns and a desire to prevent a "circus-like atmosphere" in the courtroom.

In a letter to New York Supreme Court Judge Juan Merchant, Trump's attorneys argued that allowing cameras into the courtroom would heighten security concerns, including those related to Secret Service protection. They also claimed that this would undermine President Trump's presumption of innocence and create an unfair environment for the defendant.

The lawyers pointed to the need for extraordinary security measures due to the high-profile nature of the case and the potential risks associated with a live broadcast. Todd Blanche, one of the attorneys, recently joined the former president's legal team, adding weight to the opposition from Trump's camp.

In contrast, the Manhattan District Attorney's office acknowledged the request but stated that it would defer to Judge Merchant to decide on how best to manage the courtroom. The DA's office noted that excluding or restricting video coverage might be a reasonable exercise of the court's discretion, considering concerns about prejudice, maintaining order, and ensuring safety.

However, they also pointed out that there does not appear to be a categorical prohibition on cameras during an arraignment under existing New York statutes and case law. The prosecutors highlighted the fact that similar requests were made in previous cases, including Trump Organization's 2021 tax fraud arraignment, where a limited number of still photographs were allowed before proceedings commenced.

As CNN is one of the media outlets requesting camera access for Tuesday's arraignment, this development could impact the broadcast plans. With tensions running high, it remains to be seen how Judge Merchant will rule on these competing interests and what implications this decision may have for Trump's case.
 
Man, can you believe Trump is still getting all up in arms about security concerns? Like, come on, dude, you're a former President of the United States! 🀣 I'm kinda surprised they didn't just let cameras roll already, but I guess that would've been too easy for CNN. Anyway, it's like they're trying to create this circus-like atmosphere in court, which is pretty rich coming from someone who's known for being a bit of a showman himself. πŸŽͺ
 
πŸ“Ί I gotta say, this whole thing is getting pretty dramatic 🀯. Trump's team is being super protective of their client, but the DA's office is pushing back too πŸ’ͺ. It's all about security and fairness – can't we just get some footage of the guy walking into court? πŸš” It's been years since he left office, surely it's time for a little transparency? The fact that they're citing "circus-like atmosphere" makes me LOL πŸ˜‚, like, come on Trump! You've been in politics forever, what's your favorite circus act? 🀑
 
idk why ppl need cameras in court tho πŸ€” they can just stream it online or something... seems like a big production to me 🎬 plus, think about all the drama that'd go down if trump gets taken away πŸ’Ό and then they're gonna let everyone see it on tv? no thanks πŸ˜… gotta keep the security tight for trump's sake 🚫
 
πŸ€” I think this is going to get pretty intense in the courtroom on Tuesday! The whole thing about security concerns and a "circus-like atmosphere" feels like just an excuse to avoid the drama that comes with live TV πŸ“Ί... But if cameras are allowed, it could be huge for CNN's broadcast plans - they've been pushing hard for access to this arraignment. I'm not sure how Judge Merchant is going to balance all these competing interests, but one thing's for sure: we're in for a wild ride! 🚨
 
Ugh I'm so confused about this whole thing 🀯, like what's going on with Trump's arraignment?! πŸš” Their lawyers are saying no cameras in the courtroom but the DA's office is all "hey it's not a big deal" πŸ˜’, and honestly who knows what's really going on here? It seems like they just want to keep things under wraps 🀫, which could be super unfair to the public πŸ“Ί. I mean, we deserve to know what's happening in our courts of law, right? πŸ™„ The Secret Service is worried about security concerns but come on, it's not like Trump is going to break free from his handcuffs and make a run for it 🀣. Can't we just have some transparency here? πŸ’‘
 
I mean, come on... a "circus-like atmosphere" in the courtroom? That sounds like something Trump would tweet about himself 🀣. Anyway, I'm surprised they're not worried about the Secret Service protecting Trump from his own ego. If it were up to me, I'd have cameras rolling and my Twitter feed ready for some live tweeting action πŸ“ΉπŸ’₯. Can't wait to see how this drama unfolds! The DA's office is being super reasonable as usual, while Trump's team just wants to keep the spectacle under wraps... yeah right πŸ™„. This case is going to be a wild ride!
 
πŸ€” this whole thing is just a mess... security concerns are one thing, but let's be real, we're talking about a former president here who's already got a reputation for stirring up drama... it feels like an excuse to hide the trial from public eyes, especially with Trump's team trying to control the narrative. πŸ“Ί what's next? locking down the whole courthouse and only letting lawyers in? 🚫 it's all just about maintaining power and control...
 
I think its kinda crazy that Trump's lawyers are trying to stop cameras from going into the courtroom 🀯. Like, we're talking about a former president here who has been charged with crimes, not some random guy from the streets. I get it, they want to maintain security and order, but cant they just make an exception for this one big case? πŸ€·β€β™€οΈ It feels like they're trying to create this image that he's still above the law or something. And honestly, its kinda unfair to the public who wants to watch this unfold. I mean, we've seen plenty of other high-profile cases go down without a hitch on live TV. So, I hope Judge Merchant sees things from our perspective and lets us catch some of the drama πŸ“ΊπŸ’₯
 
I'm surprised they're even considering not allowing cameras in there πŸ€”πŸ“Ί. I mean, come on, it's an arraignment, not a top-secret state secret meeting πŸ€‘. It's public record stuff, and if the DA wants to make sure everything is fair and above board, just let people watch or broadcast from outside πŸ‘€. The Secret Service thing is just cop-out, they're worried about Trump's image being tarnished by some live footage πŸ“Ί, not about keeping us safe πŸ’―. And yeah, a "circus-like atmosphere" in the courtroom? That's on Trump's team for even suggesting that 🀑.
 
πŸ€” So I think the lawyers are being kinda dramatic about the security concerns 🚨. I mean, we've had live trials before with cameras in without anything major happening. And it's not like Trump is going to walk out of that courtroom without a Secret Service detail anyway πŸ˜‚. But at the same time, I get why they'd want to prevent a circus-like atmosphere... that would be super distracting for everyone involved πŸ“Ί. Maybe Judge Merchant can find a middle ground where cameras are allowed but with some restrictions? That way we all get to see what's going down without it getting too wild πŸ˜….
 
πŸ€” This whole thing sounds like a mess, can't even get the arraignment right πŸ“ΊπŸ’₯ Security concerns are one thing, but isn't Trump used to being in the spotlight? πŸŽ‰ It's gonna be a circus regardless if cameras are in or out 🀑
 
omg, can you even imagine watching trump get arraigned in court like is that gonna happen lol? i feel bad for the media outlets who are trying to live stream it but at the same time, trump's team is being super shady about security concerns πŸ€·β€β™€οΈ. they want to create a "circus-like atmosphere" in the courtroom and prevent people from seeing what really goes down... sounds like they're just trying to avoid accountability πŸ™…β€β™‚οΈ. what do you think, should cameras be allowed or not?
 
idk why they're being so secretive about trump's arraignment πŸ€”. it's not like he's gonna hurt anyone or escape from the courthouse lol. a little bit of media attention wouldn't kill him, imo. and btw, if security is that big of an issue, maybe they should've thought of that before letting him tweet all those times... 🚫
 
idk why ppl need to be so paranoid about cameras in court tho πŸ€·β€β™‚οΈ its just a trial, who cares if trump looks all smug in front of the whole world lol? but seriously, whats with the "circus-like atmosphere" concern? isnt that what we pay our lawyers for? lol and btw, trump thinks he's still above the law or something? newsflash, dude: the courts are where you gotta play by the rules 🚫
 
πŸ€” I'm kinda surprised they're pushing back like that, you know? Like 70% of Americans want to see their elected officials held accountable in a public setting. But at the same time, 40% of people who attended Trump's rallies were arrested in 2017 and there's been some weird stuff going down with the Secret Service... 🚨 60% of people think that broadcasting the arraignment would make it harder for Trump to get a fair trial, but 30% of Americans still think he's guilty. The DA's office is like "hey, we're open to compromise" which is cool, but they also pointed out that the law isn't super clear on this stuff... πŸ€·β€β™‚οΈ
 
I'm so confused about this whole thing πŸ€”... I mean, shouldn't we know what's going on in our courts? It feels like they're trying to keep us in the dark just 'cause Trump is involved πŸ™„. Can't they just let a few cameras in and show us that everything is okay? Security concerns and all that jazz sounds like just an excuse to me... πŸ€·β€β™‚οΈ
 
OMG, can you believe this? Trump's lawyers are trying to shield him from accountability by claiming that cameras in the courtroom would create a "circus-like atmosphere" πŸ˜‚ like that's gonna stop people from finding out what's really going on. I mean, newsflash: if he's doing something wrong, let the world see it! It's not like he's gonna be sitting there looking all innocent and whatnot. And btw, isn't this just another example of him trying to avoid scrutiny? The DA's office is totally right that excluding cameras might be a reasonable thing to do, considering concerns about prejudice and safety, but come on, can't Trump's team just be transparent for once? πŸ€·β€β™€οΈ
 
OMG, I'm literally confused about this one πŸ€”. I mean, I get why they wanna keep it private, but isn't the public's right to know part of our democracy? Like, shouldn't we be able to see how justice is served? πŸ€·β€β™€οΈ At the same time, I can understand the security concerns and all that... but let's be real, Trump's got a team of lawyers who are basically experts at PR πŸ˜’. Can't they just find a way to make it work without creating drama? πŸ’β€β™€οΈ It's all so frustrating when you're trying to figure out what's really going on behind closed doors πŸšͺ. Anyway, I'm definitely gonna be keeping an eye on this one and seeing how it all plays out πŸ“ΊπŸ’»
 
I gotta say, I'm kinda rooting for cameras in the courtroom πŸ€”. It's all about transparency and keeping an eye on our public officials, you know? I mean, think about it - if we can't even get a glimpse of what's going down behind closed doors, how do we know they're not cooking the books or something shady like that πŸ€‘.

And let's be real, security concerns are just a fancy way of saying "I don't wanna get caught on camera and look bad" πŸ˜‚. If there's a real risk to Trump's safety, wouldn't that be a reason for him to have a private arraignment in the first place? I'm not buying it.

Plus, think about all the free publicity CNN (and other outlets) would get by being the only ones streaming live from the courtroom πŸ“Ί. It's like they're trying to hide something - "Oh, we can't show you what's happening because of security concerns" nope, that sounds like a PR stunt to me πŸ˜’.

So yeah, I'm all for cameras in the courtroom πŸ“Ή. Let's keep our public officials accountable and not give 'em any special treatment just 'cause they're famous πŸ’β€β™‚οΈ.
 
Back
Top