Trump's lawyers push back against media request to broadcast former President Donald Trump's arraignment, citing potential security concerns and a desire to prevent a "circus-like atmosphere" in the courtroom.
In a letter to New York Supreme Court Judge Juan Merchant, Trump's attorneys argued that allowing cameras into the courtroom would heighten security concerns, including those related to Secret Service protection. They also claimed that this would undermine President Trump's presumption of innocence and create an unfair environment for the defendant.
The lawyers pointed to the need for extraordinary security measures due to the high-profile nature of the case and the potential risks associated with a live broadcast. Todd Blanche, one of the attorneys, recently joined the former president's legal team, adding weight to the opposition from Trump's camp.
In contrast, the Manhattan District Attorney's office acknowledged the request but stated that it would defer to Judge Merchant to decide on how best to manage the courtroom. The DA's office noted that excluding or restricting video coverage might be a reasonable exercise of the court's discretion, considering concerns about prejudice, maintaining order, and ensuring safety.
However, they also pointed out that there does not appear to be a categorical prohibition on cameras during an arraignment under existing New York statutes and case law. The prosecutors highlighted the fact that similar requests were made in previous cases, including Trump Organization's 2021 tax fraud arraignment, where a limited number of still photographs were allowed before proceedings commenced.
As CNN is one of the media outlets requesting camera access for Tuesday's arraignment, this development could impact the broadcast plans. With tensions running high, it remains to be seen how Judge Merchant will rule on these competing interests and what implications this decision may have for Trump's case.
In a letter to New York Supreme Court Judge Juan Merchant, Trump's attorneys argued that allowing cameras into the courtroom would heighten security concerns, including those related to Secret Service protection. They also claimed that this would undermine President Trump's presumption of innocence and create an unfair environment for the defendant.
The lawyers pointed to the need for extraordinary security measures due to the high-profile nature of the case and the potential risks associated with a live broadcast. Todd Blanche, one of the attorneys, recently joined the former president's legal team, adding weight to the opposition from Trump's camp.
In contrast, the Manhattan District Attorney's office acknowledged the request but stated that it would defer to Judge Merchant to decide on how best to manage the courtroom. The DA's office noted that excluding or restricting video coverage might be a reasonable exercise of the court's discretion, considering concerns about prejudice, maintaining order, and ensuring safety.
However, they also pointed out that there does not appear to be a categorical prohibition on cameras during an arraignment under existing New York statutes and case law. The prosecutors highlighted the fact that similar requests were made in previous cases, including Trump Organization's 2021 tax fraud arraignment, where a limited number of still photographs were allowed before proceedings commenced.
As CNN is one of the media outlets requesting camera access for Tuesday's arraignment, this development could impact the broadcast plans. With tensions running high, it remains to be seen how Judge Merchant will rule on these competing interests and what implications this decision may have for Trump's case.