British Airways has Pulled Plug on Louis Theroux Podcast Over Bob Vylan Interview
In a move that has left fans of British journalist Louis Theroux's podcast in shock, the airline has withdrawn its sponsorship over an interview with the frontman of Bob Vylan, whose real name is Pascal Robinson-Foster. The decision comes after Vylan expressed regret for leading chants of "death to the IDF" during his Glastonbury set this summer, a move that sparked widespread outrage and calls for boycotts.
According to sources close to the matter, British Airways deemed the podcast's content to be in breach of its sponsorship policy due to its perceived "politically sensitive" nature. The airline stated it was grateful that the issue had been brought to their attention and promised to investigate how such a breach could occur in the future.
The rap duo, Bob Vylan, has already faced significant fallout from his Glastonbury performance, with two gigs postponed due to pressure from MPs and Jewish community leaders. In an interview with Theroux, which was recorded on October 1st, Vylan claimed he would "do it again tomorrow" if given the chance, sparking even more outrage.
Despite the backlash, Vylan insisted that his intention was not to cause offense but rather to draw attention to the plight of Palestinians and express solidarity with those affected by the Israeli-Palestinian conflict. However, many critics saw his comments as tone-deaf and insensitive, particularly in light of the fact that they were recorded and broadcast on television.
The BBC faced criticism for not pulling the feed of Vylan's Glastonbury set during its live broadcast, despite guidelines stating it should avoid "harm and offence". The incident has raised questions about freedom of speech versus responsibility to avoid causing harm.
It remains to be seen how this episode will affect Vylan's music career or the reputation of Louis Theroux's podcast. However one thing is clear: British Airways has made a statement, and that statement is that some forms of free expression are not welcome in certain contexts.
				
			In a move that has left fans of British journalist Louis Theroux's podcast in shock, the airline has withdrawn its sponsorship over an interview with the frontman of Bob Vylan, whose real name is Pascal Robinson-Foster. The decision comes after Vylan expressed regret for leading chants of "death to the IDF" during his Glastonbury set this summer, a move that sparked widespread outrage and calls for boycotts.
According to sources close to the matter, British Airways deemed the podcast's content to be in breach of its sponsorship policy due to its perceived "politically sensitive" nature. The airline stated it was grateful that the issue had been brought to their attention and promised to investigate how such a breach could occur in the future.
The rap duo, Bob Vylan, has already faced significant fallout from his Glastonbury performance, with two gigs postponed due to pressure from MPs and Jewish community leaders. In an interview with Theroux, which was recorded on October 1st, Vylan claimed he would "do it again tomorrow" if given the chance, sparking even more outrage.
Despite the backlash, Vylan insisted that his intention was not to cause offense but rather to draw attention to the plight of Palestinians and express solidarity with those affected by the Israeli-Palestinian conflict. However, many critics saw his comments as tone-deaf and insensitive, particularly in light of the fact that they were recorded and broadcast on television.
The BBC faced criticism for not pulling the feed of Vylan's Glastonbury set during its live broadcast, despite guidelines stating it should avoid "harm and offence". The incident has raised questions about freedom of speech versus responsibility to avoid causing harm.
It remains to be seen how this episode will affect Vylan's music career or the reputation of Louis Theroux's podcast. However one thing is clear: British Airways has made a statement, and that statement is that some forms of free expression are not welcome in certain contexts.
 they just pulled the plug on sponsorship after an interview w/ bob vylan who had some pretty controversial comments about israel during his glastonbury set
 they just pulled the plug on sponsorship after an interview w/ bob vylan who had some pretty controversial comments about israel during his glastonbury set  like i get what he was tryna do but boy did it backfire
 like i get what he was tryna do but boy did it backfire  its all about balance, right? u cant just express ur opinion without considerin the other person's feelin
 its all about balance, right? u cant just express ur opinion without considerin the other person's feelin  but at the same time u dont wanna stifle free speech either
 but at the same time u dont wanna stifle free speech either  british airways is just tryna avoid any more drama, i guess
 british airways is just tryna avoid any more drama, i guess 
 and yet, vylan's just trying to speak out against injustice... is that really too much to ask for in this world?
 and yet, vylan's just trying to speak out against injustice... is that really too much to ask for in this world? 
 I don't get why they're pulling the plug over just one interview
 I don't get why they're pulling the plug over just one interview  . It's not like Theroux was trying to promote Vylan's music or anything
. It's not like Theroux was trying to promote Vylan's music or anything  . The airline is basically saying that if someone says something provocative, they can't have your sponsorship money
. The airline is basically saying that if someone says something provocative, they can't have your sponsorship money  . What about free speech, though? Isn't that what we're supposed to be fighting for?
. What about free speech, though? Isn't that what we're supposed to be fighting for?  . Honestly, I don't think it was fair to pull the plug like that... doesn't mean they gotta be associated with his opinions on the other hand
. Honestly, I don't think it was fair to pull the plug like that... doesn't mean they gotta be associated with his opinions on the other hand  . Guess it just shows how tricky it can get when you're trying to talk about tough issues without offending anyone
. Guess it just shows how tricky it can get when you're trying to talk about tough issues without offending anyone  . Still love Theroux's podcast tho
. Still love Theroux's podcast tho 

 The fact that they deemed it "politically sensitive" is just code for "we don't want to get involved in this controversy". What's next, will they start censoring their own announcements on the flight? It's so disappointing that an airline would be more afraid of backlash than actually encouraging meaningful dialogue
 The fact that they deemed it "politically sensitive" is just code for "we don't want to get involved in this controversy". What's next, will they start censoring their own announcements on the flight? It's so disappointing that an airline would be more afraid of backlash than actually encouraging meaningful dialogue  british airways made a statement and now we know they don't want any controversy on their planes, that's fair i guess.
 british airways made a statement and now we know they don't want any controversy on their planes, that's fair i guess. . did they not think this through before sponsoring the podcast? or was it just a knee-jerk reaction because the public backlash got too much?
. did they not think this through before sponsoring the podcast? or was it just a knee-jerk reaction because the public backlash got too much?  .
. . The BBC should've been more careful with their broadcast too, I thought they were supposed to be all about freedom of speech?
. The BBC should've been more careful with their broadcast too, I thought they were supposed to be all about freedom of speech?  . Maybe this is a wake-up call for people to think more critically about what we say and how it might affect others... or maybe not
. Maybe this is a wake-up call for people to think more critically about what we say and how it might affect others... or maybe not 
