Federal Appeals Court to Rehear Case on Trump's Authority to Deploy National Guard in Portland
A federal appeals court has agreed to rehear a case over President Donald Trump's authority to deploy national guard forces in Portland, Oregon, after a three-judge panel ruled against him last week. The decision means that the issue will be heard by a broader panel of 11 judges.
The ruling comes as the city of Portland continues to grapple with the presence of federalized guard members, who have been deployed to the city since late September following months of protests. Local officials and residents argue that local officers have control of the situation, while the federal government claims that federal officials working at an ICE facility in south Portland were under attack.
The appeals court's decision on Tuesday vacated a previous ruling from the three-judge panel, which had sided with Trump's characterization of Portland as "war ravaged" and allowed him to deploy 200 Oregon national guard troops. However, the new ruling blocks Trump from deploying any additional troops to the city.
Oregon Attorney General Dan Rayfield hailed the decision as a victory for the state's laws and values, saying that it shows "the truth matters and that the courts are working to hold this administration accountable." He added that the court's message is clear: "the president cannot send the military into US cities unnecessarily."
The development comes as Portland residents have been countering Trump's characterization of their city by sharing videos of its natural beauty and thriving food scene. Locals have also been drawing up plans for a "Emergency Naked Bike Ride" against what they see as the militarization of their city.
The case is the latest chapter in a long-running legal saga over Trump's authority to deploy national guard forces in Portland, which has become a focal point for protests and activism in recent months.
A federal appeals court has agreed to rehear a case over President Donald Trump's authority to deploy national guard forces in Portland, Oregon, after a three-judge panel ruled against him last week. The decision means that the issue will be heard by a broader panel of 11 judges.
The ruling comes as the city of Portland continues to grapple with the presence of federalized guard members, who have been deployed to the city since late September following months of protests. Local officials and residents argue that local officers have control of the situation, while the federal government claims that federal officials working at an ICE facility in south Portland were under attack.
The appeals court's decision on Tuesday vacated a previous ruling from the three-judge panel, which had sided with Trump's characterization of Portland as "war ravaged" and allowed him to deploy 200 Oregon national guard troops. However, the new ruling blocks Trump from deploying any additional troops to the city.
Oregon Attorney General Dan Rayfield hailed the decision as a victory for the state's laws and values, saying that it shows "the truth matters and that the courts are working to hold this administration accountable." He added that the court's message is clear: "the president cannot send the military into US cities unnecessarily."
The development comes as Portland residents have been countering Trump's characterization of their city by sharing videos of its natural beauty and thriving food scene. Locals have also been drawing up plans for a "Emergency Naked Bike Ride" against what they see as the militarization of their city.
The case is the latest chapter in a long-running legal saga over Trump's authority to deploy national guard forces in Portland, which has become a focal point for protests and activism in recent months.
. Can't believe we're still debating what's best for our cities. I mean, come on, 200 Oregon National Guard troops? That's just excessive 
. What really gets me is that the president thinks he can just deploy troops without consulting local authorities or even thinking about the impact it has on the community 
. And now, because of some court decision, no more new troops are being added... but what about all the ones already there? Are they just going to sit around twiddling their thumbs waiting for someone to tell them what to do? 
and btw who needs a naked bike ride to show the government what's up? 
... it's like they're caught between the federal gov and local officials 
. I don't think it's right that the pres is gonna send in the military without proper reason, you know? 
It's their job to keep the city safe, but not by imposing them on us 
.
... it shows that we value our rights and freedoms too 
... it's all about perspective, you know? 
... but for now, let's keep calm and respectful conversations 
. No need to resort to extreme measures like a naked bike ride 
.
... it just seems like trump's trying to assert his authority in an area where local authorities should have control. the fact that portland residents are countering with videos of their city's beauty and food scene is kinda cool 
, but at the same time, it feels like they're being defensive about something that shouldn't be a big deal. can we just relax already? 
. It's all about holding those in power accountable for their actions 
. Let's hope the courts keep saying no to Trump's militarization plans 
. This case might not be a "war ravaged" Portland, but it's definitely a victory for democracy 
.
. The idea that the president can send troops into US cities without explanation or justification is deeply troubling.
.
! And I gotta say, Oregon AG Dan Rayfield is totally right that the president can't just send in troops willy-nilly without a good reason 
. Its cool that Portland residents are pushing back against Trump's characterization of their city and showing off its awesomeness instead 
. I mean, who needs war ravaged when you have food trucks and breweries, am i right? 
!
. Plus, it's awesome to see Oregon Attorney General Dan Rayfield standing up for his state's laws and values 
. It's like they're saying, "Hey, we know you think our city is messed up, but actually, it's pretty awesome!" 
Portland's got its beauty back... and a little bit of satire 
Can't deploy without permission... unless you're the real deal... or just trying to get attention? [GIF: A man in a chicken suit holding a megaphone]
I can feel how frustrating this situation must be for everyone involved... especially the people of Portland who are just trying to live their lives without all this extra stress 
. The fact that they're actually having an emergency naked bike ride as a form of protest is just too much 
maybe it'll even make it to the supreme court 