Trump Takes a Page from Authoritarian Playbooks to Intimidate Critics, Says Democrat Senator
A growing number of Democrats have come under fire from President Trump for criticizing his policies, sparking concerns about a coordinated effort to silence critics and intimidate potential dissenters. At the forefront of this backlash is Elissa Slotkin, a Michigan senator who has been at odds with the president over issues like military service members refusing orders that violate the law or constitution.
Slotkin's experience as a former CIA analyst has given her a unique perspective on authoritarian regimes and their tactics to stifle free speech. She says Trump's administration is employing similar strategies to chill dissenting voices, including physical intimidation and legal intimidation.
"They're now using a well-worn playbook that employs physical intimidation and legal intimidation to get you to shut up," Slotkin explained in an interview with The Guardian. "It's absolutely a strategy well used in other countries and other authoritarian governments."
Slotkin herself has faced scrutiny from Trump after releasing a video with fellow Democrats urging military service members to refuse orders they deem unlawful. In response, the president branded the message "treasonous" and encouraged social media posts suggesting those who took part be hanged.
The Democratic senator also highlighted the need for bold action on housing affordability, citing a shortage of 4 million homes as a pressing issue that requires immediate attention. Her proposed emergency measure would freeze laws and regulations that hinder housing development, reward communities that support growth with federal dollars, and utilize the Defense Production Act to direct domestic industries to produce essential materials.
Slotkin's efforts have been met with skepticism from Trump, who has failed to take meaningful action on issues like housing affordability despite running on a platform of lowering costs for Americans. The senator argues that this inaction is symptomatic of a broader pattern of Trump prioritizing foreign policy over domestic issues.
"As someone who worked alongside our Nato partners my entire career, I'm embarrassed to take people's phone calls," Slotkin said. "It is beyond the pale that we have the United States of America talking about using military action in a fellow Nato country."
Slotkin's stance on Trump and his policies has made her an outlier within her own party. While some Democrats have criticized her for being too aggressive, others see her as a voice of reason who is pushing the conversation towards more pressing issues.
In a bid to reconnect with voters, Slotkin plans to deliver a speech next month highlighting the importance of democracy in everyday life. She believes that the media narrative around Trump has become muddled and that Democrats must take responsibility for defending their core values.
"The fundamental division and differences we have, even in my own caucus here in the Senate, is between people who believe that Trump is an existential threat to democracy and people who believe that Trump is bad but we just need to wait him out," Slotkin said. "I'm in the first camp, and those are folks who are really starting to get some of the alpha energy back."
A growing number of Democrats have come under fire from President Trump for criticizing his policies, sparking concerns about a coordinated effort to silence critics and intimidate potential dissenters. At the forefront of this backlash is Elissa Slotkin, a Michigan senator who has been at odds with the president over issues like military service members refusing orders that violate the law or constitution.
Slotkin's experience as a former CIA analyst has given her a unique perspective on authoritarian regimes and their tactics to stifle free speech. She says Trump's administration is employing similar strategies to chill dissenting voices, including physical intimidation and legal intimidation.
"They're now using a well-worn playbook that employs physical intimidation and legal intimidation to get you to shut up," Slotkin explained in an interview with The Guardian. "It's absolutely a strategy well used in other countries and other authoritarian governments."
Slotkin herself has faced scrutiny from Trump after releasing a video with fellow Democrats urging military service members to refuse orders they deem unlawful. In response, the president branded the message "treasonous" and encouraged social media posts suggesting those who took part be hanged.
The Democratic senator also highlighted the need for bold action on housing affordability, citing a shortage of 4 million homes as a pressing issue that requires immediate attention. Her proposed emergency measure would freeze laws and regulations that hinder housing development, reward communities that support growth with federal dollars, and utilize the Defense Production Act to direct domestic industries to produce essential materials.
Slotkin's efforts have been met with skepticism from Trump, who has failed to take meaningful action on issues like housing affordability despite running on a platform of lowering costs for Americans. The senator argues that this inaction is symptomatic of a broader pattern of Trump prioritizing foreign policy over domestic issues.
"As someone who worked alongside our Nato partners my entire career, I'm embarrassed to take people's phone calls," Slotkin said. "It is beyond the pale that we have the United States of America talking about using military action in a fellow Nato country."
Slotkin's stance on Trump and his policies has made her an outlier within her own party. While some Democrats have criticized her for being too aggressive, others see her as a voice of reason who is pushing the conversation towards more pressing issues.
In a bid to reconnect with voters, Slotkin plans to deliver a speech next month highlighting the importance of democracy in everyday life. She believes that the media narrative around Trump has become muddled and that Democrats must take responsibility for defending their core values.
"The fundamental division and differences we have, even in my own caucus here in the Senate, is between people who believe that Trump is an existential threat to democracy and people who believe that Trump is bad but we just need to wait him out," Slotkin said. "I'm in the first camp, and those are folks who are really starting to get some of the alpha energy back."