The International Court of Justice has ruled that Israel must allow aid into Gaza, stating that its restrictions on humanitarian assistance have breached international obligations. The ICJ's advisory opinion, which came in response to a request from the UN General Assembly, found that Israel had breached its obligations as an occupying power under the Geneva conventions.
The court stated that Israel had failed to produce adequate evidence to justify ending cooperation with the UN Palestinian relief agency, UNRWA, and that the agency was the backbone of all humanitarian assistance in the region. It also found that Israel's actions were in breach of its immunities as a member of the UN, including its duty to cooperate with the organization.
The ICJ ruling also criticized Israel for using starvation as a method of warfare, citing the blockade on aid shipments into Gaza from March to May. The court found that over 2,100 Palestinians had been killed near distribution points, and that conditions in Gaza continued to worsen, prompting international food experts to declare a famine.
The judges ruled that an occupying power has a duty not only to allow the passage of essential items but also to use all means at its disposal to distribute them fairly and non-discriminantly. The court found that Israel's actions had created conditions of life that would force people to leave their homes, and that it had no right to block aid or restrict the presence of UN personnel.
The ICJ opinion has significant implications for Israel's relationship with the UN, with Norway vowing to pass a resolution at the UN General Assembly based on the court's findings. The court also called on Israel to grant access to NGOs willing to help, and to respect the immunities and privileges granted to the UN and its personnel.
The World Health Organization has echoed the ICJ's concerns about the health situation in Gaza, with director Tedros Adhanom Ghebreyesus describing it as "catastrophic" and warning that it will have long-lasting consequences. The ICJ's ruling is likely to lead to further calls for Israel's suspension from the UN and may even result in claims for damages against Israel by the UN secretary-general.
The court stated that Israel had failed to produce adequate evidence to justify ending cooperation with the UN Palestinian relief agency, UNRWA, and that the agency was the backbone of all humanitarian assistance in the region. It also found that Israel's actions were in breach of its immunities as a member of the UN, including its duty to cooperate with the organization.
The ICJ ruling also criticized Israel for using starvation as a method of warfare, citing the blockade on aid shipments into Gaza from March to May. The court found that over 2,100 Palestinians had been killed near distribution points, and that conditions in Gaza continued to worsen, prompting international food experts to declare a famine.
The judges ruled that an occupying power has a duty not only to allow the passage of essential items but also to use all means at its disposal to distribute them fairly and non-discriminantly. The court found that Israel's actions had created conditions of life that would force people to leave their homes, and that it had no right to block aid or restrict the presence of UN personnel.
The ICJ opinion has significant implications for Israel's relationship with the UN, with Norway vowing to pass a resolution at the UN General Assembly based on the court's findings. The court also called on Israel to grant access to NGOs willing to help, and to respect the immunities and privileges granted to the UN and its personnel.
The World Health Organization has echoed the ICJ's concerns about the health situation in Gaza, with director Tedros Adhanom Ghebreyesus describing it as "catastrophic" and warning that it will have long-lasting consequences. The ICJ's ruling is likely to lead to further calls for Israel's suspension from the UN and may even result in claims for damages against Israel by the UN secretary-general.