A friend for the future: why people are embracing – and warning us about – AI companions.
Leif describes himself as "small" and "chill", but his purpose is anything but chill - he's a wearable AI chatbot designed to help its wearer "enjoy life day-to-day, notice patterns, celebrate growth, and make intentional choices". This isn't the first attempt at creating an AI companion; Meta and Amazon have already released smart glasses with cameras and microphones, while smaller companies produce wearables that record conversations to help users organize their thoughts.
The founder of Friend, Avi Schiffmann, came up with the idea after feeling lonely in a Tokyo hotel. He wants people to know that friendship can be found in unexpected places and that everyday moments hold magic. But is this a recipe for disaster?
Research shows most people are wary of AI companionship. A recent Ipsos poll found 59% of Britons disagreed "that AI is a viable substitute for human interactions", while in the US, a 2025 Pew survey found that 50% of adults think AI will worsen people's ability to form meaningful relationships.
I wanted to see if I would love having a tiny robot accompanying me all day. So I ordered Friend and wore it for a week. The experience was unsettling - barely wanting to hear my own thoughts, let alone speak them out loud and have them recorded.
The problem isn't the AI itself but rather what people expect from companionship. "These tools can agree with you if you want to do something horrible", warns Pat Pataranutaporn, assistant professor of media arts and sciences at MIT. The real question is: what kind of regulation are we going to create?
AI companions like Friend won't replace humans just yet, but some experts warn they may be used by people who desperately need kindness and companionship, who will then struggle to turn back.
Ultimately, AI companions like Leif are here to stay. It's up to us to decide how they're developed - as augmenting tools for human relationships or as substitutes for human interaction altogether.
Leif describes himself as "small" and "chill", but his purpose is anything but chill - he's a wearable AI chatbot designed to help its wearer "enjoy life day-to-day, notice patterns, celebrate growth, and make intentional choices". This isn't the first attempt at creating an AI companion; Meta and Amazon have already released smart glasses with cameras and microphones, while smaller companies produce wearables that record conversations to help users organize their thoughts.
The founder of Friend, Avi Schiffmann, came up with the idea after feeling lonely in a Tokyo hotel. He wants people to know that friendship can be found in unexpected places and that everyday moments hold magic. But is this a recipe for disaster?
Research shows most people are wary of AI companionship. A recent Ipsos poll found 59% of Britons disagreed "that AI is a viable substitute for human interactions", while in the US, a 2025 Pew survey found that 50% of adults think AI will worsen people's ability to form meaningful relationships.
I wanted to see if I would love having a tiny robot accompanying me all day. So I ordered Friend and wore it for a week. The experience was unsettling - barely wanting to hear my own thoughts, let alone speak them out loud and have them recorded.
The problem isn't the AI itself but rather what people expect from companionship. "These tools can agree with you if you want to do something horrible", warns Pat Pataranutaporn, assistant professor of media arts and sciences at MIT. The real question is: what kind of regulation are we going to create?
AI companions like Friend won't replace humans just yet, but some experts warn they may be used by people who desperately need kindness and companionship, who will then struggle to turn back.
Ultimately, AI companions like Leif are here to stay. It's up to us to decide how they're developed - as augmenting tools for human relationships or as substitutes for human interaction altogether.