In a coordinated effort to undermine the growing "Make America Healthy Again" movement, which seeks to curb Americans' consumption of soda and ultra-processed foods, major US soft-drink and snack-food corporations have turned to a partially formalized network of for-hire pollsters, strategists, and political financiers with deep ties to the national Republican party.
The American Beverage Association is leading this effort in conjunction with the Consumer Brands Association, two prominent trade groups in the food industry. The Coca-Cola Company, PepsiCo, Keurig Dr Pepper, General Mills, Kraft Heinz, Mondelēz, and Nestlé are among the top soda-makers that pay dues for the right to have a say in either or both of the trade groups' strategies.
These corporations view the Maha movement's efforts as significant threats to their bottom lines. In their most recent annual reports, Coke and Dr Pepper suggested that risks would be compounded if government officials were to voice health concerns about their products. The soda makers did not respond to questions about the lobbying effort.
The campaign's primary goal is to create a narrative that pitting Maga supporters against Make America Healthy Again movement supporters will stymie the Maha-led efforts to curb Americans' consumption of soda and ultra-processed foods. Veteran GOP strategists serving as middle operatives are being used to create the appearance of distance between the companies and their preferred narrative.
The effort features Maga influencers hired by a firm that promotes "anti-woke" movies, an obscure research group Lee Zeldin was working for when Donald Trump picked him to lead the US Environmental Protection Agency, and a media outlet backed by right-wing billionaires Leonard Leo and Charles Koch, among others.
Paid-influencer campaigns have also been used to promote pro-soda messaging nationwide. A group of Maga-aligned influencers were taking the same message nationwide by posting client-approved talking points on Elon Musk's X – all while not disclosing they were being paid to do so.
Industry lobbyists are using a network of pollsters, strategists, and political financiers to make their case to lawmakers directly, while also using right-wing media outlets to promote the narrative that Maha's nutrition agenda is an affront to Trump voters. The goal is to create confusion among policymakers about what issues truly matter to their base.
The campaign highlights the dangers of government overregulation in restricting soda purchases through food-aid programs. Industry lobbyists are attempting to sway conservative lawmakers by threatening a Maga backlash if they oppose the Maha movement's efforts.
Despite the controversy surrounding the lobbying effort, the Trump administration has pushed back on the idea that Maha's nutrition agenda is an affront to its base. The American Beverage Association has described the efforts as an overreach of government authority, but experts argue that it is a thinly veiled attempt by the industry to undermine public health initiatives.
As states begin to pass legislation restricting food dyes in school meals and implementing waivers for SNAP recipients to purchase soda, some argue that this campaign reflects a broader effort to silence public health advocates.
The American Beverage Association is leading this effort in conjunction with the Consumer Brands Association, two prominent trade groups in the food industry. The Coca-Cola Company, PepsiCo, Keurig Dr Pepper, General Mills, Kraft Heinz, Mondelēz, and Nestlé are among the top soda-makers that pay dues for the right to have a say in either or both of the trade groups' strategies.
These corporations view the Maha movement's efforts as significant threats to their bottom lines. In their most recent annual reports, Coke and Dr Pepper suggested that risks would be compounded if government officials were to voice health concerns about their products. The soda makers did not respond to questions about the lobbying effort.
The campaign's primary goal is to create a narrative that pitting Maga supporters against Make America Healthy Again movement supporters will stymie the Maha-led efforts to curb Americans' consumption of soda and ultra-processed foods. Veteran GOP strategists serving as middle operatives are being used to create the appearance of distance between the companies and their preferred narrative.
The effort features Maga influencers hired by a firm that promotes "anti-woke" movies, an obscure research group Lee Zeldin was working for when Donald Trump picked him to lead the US Environmental Protection Agency, and a media outlet backed by right-wing billionaires Leonard Leo and Charles Koch, among others.
Paid-influencer campaigns have also been used to promote pro-soda messaging nationwide. A group of Maga-aligned influencers were taking the same message nationwide by posting client-approved talking points on Elon Musk's X – all while not disclosing they were being paid to do so.
Industry lobbyists are using a network of pollsters, strategists, and political financiers to make their case to lawmakers directly, while also using right-wing media outlets to promote the narrative that Maha's nutrition agenda is an affront to Trump voters. The goal is to create confusion among policymakers about what issues truly matter to their base.
The campaign highlights the dangers of government overregulation in restricting soda purchases through food-aid programs. Industry lobbyists are attempting to sway conservative lawmakers by threatening a Maga backlash if they oppose the Maha movement's efforts.
Despite the controversy surrounding the lobbying effort, the Trump administration has pushed back on the idea that Maha's nutrition agenda is an affront to its base. The American Beverage Association has described the efforts as an overreach of government authority, but experts argue that it is a thinly veiled attempt by the industry to undermine public health initiatives.
As states begin to pass legislation restricting food dyes in school meals and implementing waivers for SNAP recipients to purchase soda, some argue that this campaign reflects a broader effort to silence public health advocates.