A powerful coalition of US soft-drink and snack-food corporations has launched a coordinated campaign to undermine Robert F Kennedy Jr's "Make America Healthy Again" movement, seeking to curb Americans' consumption of soda and ultra-processed foods. The American Beverage Association is leading the effort, which involves a network of for-hire pollsters, strategists, and political financiers with ties to the national Republican party.
The companies behind these beverages have come under criticism from health experts over their role in contributing to rising rates of obesity and diabetes in the US. Kennedy's movement aims to address this issue through legislation aimed at limiting access to unhealthy foods and promoting healthier eating options.
However, the soda industry has taken a different approach. In an effort to influence public opinion, the American Beverage Association has hired Maga-aligned influencers to promote their interests on social media platforms like X (formerly Twitter). These influencers have been paid to share talking points that downplay the health risks associated with drinking soda and emphasize the importance of individual choice.
Industry lobbyists are also working directly with lawmakers, using a network of veteran GOP strategists to push back against the Maha movement. This includes companies such as PepsiCo and Coca-Cola, which are among the largest soft-drink corporations in the US.
The American Beverage Association has been accused of attempting to intimidate lawmakers by threatening to mobilize its base if they do not oppose the Maha movement. The group's CEO, Kevin Keane, has made public statements emphasizing the importance of individual choice and criticizing government intervention in matters of nutrition.
However, critics argue that this approach is misleading and ignores the overwhelming scientific evidence on the health risks associated with drinking soda. Many experts believe that Kennedy's movement has a strong argument for limiting access to unhealthy foods, particularly given the significant impact they have on public health.
Despite the efforts by the American Beverage Association, the Maha movement has gained traction at the state level, with several dozen states having requested waivers from federal regulations allowing them to restrict food dyes in school meals. Additionally, a half-dozen states have passed legislation restricting food dyes in school meals.
While the soda industry's campaign may be successful in undermining the Maha movement at the national level, it is likely that the issue will continue to gain momentum at the state and local levels. As Kristen Chevrier, a Republican state representative who sponsored a bill to restrict food dyes in her state, noted, "It's easier for the big food industries to control the federal government than it is for them to control a whole bunch of different states."
The companies behind these beverages have come under criticism from health experts over their role in contributing to rising rates of obesity and diabetes in the US. Kennedy's movement aims to address this issue through legislation aimed at limiting access to unhealthy foods and promoting healthier eating options.
However, the soda industry has taken a different approach. In an effort to influence public opinion, the American Beverage Association has hired Maga-aligned influencers to promote their interests on social media platforms like X (formerly Twitter). These influencers have been paid to share talking points that downplay the health risks associated with drinking soda and emphasize the importance of individual choice.
Industry lobbyists are also working directly with lawmakers, using a network of veteran GOP strategists to push back against the Maha movement. This includes companies such as PepsiCo and Coca-Cola, which are among the largest soft-drink corporations in the US.
The American Beverage Association has been accused of attempting to intimidate lawmakers by threatening to mobilize its base if they do not oppose the Maha movement. The group's CEO, Kevin Keane, has made public statements emphasizing the importance of individual choice and criticizing government intervention in matters of nutrition.
However, critics argue that this approach is misleading and ignores the overwhelming scientific evidence on the health risks associated with drinking soda. Many experts believe that Kennedy's movement has a strong argument for limiting access to unhealthy foods, particularly given the significant impact they have on public health.
Despite the efforts by the American Beverage Association, the Maha movement has gained traction at the state level, with several dozen states having requested waivers from federal regulations allowing them to restrict food dyes in school meals. Additionally, a half-dozen states have passed legislation restricting food dyes in school meals.
While the soda industry's campaign may be successful in undermining the Maha movement at the national level, it is likely that the issue will continue to gain momentum at the state and local levels. As Kristen Chevrier, a Republican state representative who sponsored a bill to restrict food dyes in her state, noted, "It's easier for the big food industries to control the federal government than it is for them to control a whole bunch of different states."