Golf legend Jack Nicklaus has emerged victorious in a $50m defamation case against his former company, Nicklaus Companies. The jury's verdict comes after nearly two decades of bitter dispute over allegations that Nicklaus was considering a lucrative deal with Saudi-backed LIV Golf League.
The case began when Nicklaus sold the rights to his name and image to Nicklaus Companies for $145m in 2007. However, when he stepped down from an executive role in 2017, the company sued him, claiming he had secretly entertained talks with LIV Golf. The allegations led to a series of vicious rumors, including claims that Nicklaus was suffering from dementia and could no longer handle his affairs.
Nicklaus responded by filing a defamation suit against the company, accusing them of spreading false stories about his involvement with LIV Golf. He claimed the company had planted false narratives that he had "sold out" the PGA Tour for Saudi money, causing significant damage to his reputation.
After four and a half hours of deliberation, the jury found in favor of Nicklaus, ruling that the company's actions had defamed him by spreading false claims about his mental fitness and his relationship with LIV Golf. The verdict exposed Nicklaus Companies to ridicule, hatred, mistrust, distrust, or contempt.
The case is seen as a victory for Nicklaus, who has consistently denied any wrongdoing. His attorney said he "tremendously appreciates the time that the jury put into this case" and expressed relief that his client's reputation had been vindicated.
The dispute between Nicklaus and his former company has led to a series of court rulings, including one earlier this year which confirmed Nicklaus' freedom to use his own name and likeness in future golf ventures. However, the company retained the rights to sell branded apparel and equipment.
Nicklaus' win marks a significant end to one of the most bitter business feuds in golf. The 85-year-old has remained steadfast in his denials of wrongdoing, and the jury's verdict is seen as a testament to his enduring reputation and legacy in the sport.
The case began when Nicklaus sold the rights to his name and image to Nicklaus Companies for $145m in 2007. However, when he stepped down from an executive role in 2017, the company sued him, claiming he had secretly entertained talks with LIV Golf. The allegations led to a series of vicious rumors, including claims that Nicklaus was suffering from dementia and could no longer handle his affairs.
Nicklaus responded by filing a defamation suit against the company, accusing them of spreading false stories about his involvement with LIV Golf. He claimed the company had planted false narratives that he had "sold out" the PGA Tour for Saudi money, causing significant damage to his reputation.
After four and a half hours of deliberation, the jury found in favor of Nicklaus, ruling that the company's actions had defamed him by spreading false claims about his mental fitness and his relationship with LIV Golf. The verdict exposed Nicklaus Companies to ridicule, hatred, mistrust, distrust, or contempt.
The case is seen as a victory for Nicklaus, who has consistently denied any wrongdoing. His attorney said he "tremendously appreciates the time that the jury put into this case" and expressed relief that his client's reputation had been vindicated.
The dispute between Nicklaus and his former company has led to a series of court rulings, including one earlier this year which confirmed Nicklaus' freedom to use his own name and likeness in future golf ventures. However, the company retained the rights to sell branded apparel and equipment.
Nicklaus' win marks a significant end to one of the most bitter business feuds in golf. The 85-year-old has remained steadfast in his denials of wrongdoing, and the jury's verdict is seen as a testament to his enduring reputation and legacy in the sport.