Judge Scolds Trump Officials Over 'Troubling' Remarks About El Salvador Deportation Case Defendant
US District Judge Waverly Crenshaw has rebuked remarks made by top Trump officials, warning them against making "troubling" and potentially prejudicial statements about Kilmar Abrego Garcia, the defendant at the center of a high-profile deportation case.
The remarks, which were deemed extrajudicial by the judge, were seen as exaggerated and inaccurate, and could have compromised Abrego's right to a fair trial. Homeland Security Secretary Kristi Noem made comments suggesting Abrego was involved in organized crime, while former Attorney General Pam Bondi stated he played a significant role in an alien smuggling ring.
Crenshaw has put these officials "on notice" that making such statements without court permission could result in sanctions. The judge has also granted Abrego's motion to require DOJ and DHS officials to refrain from making prejudicial extrajudicial statements, emphasizing that this is not an ordinary case.
The deportation controversy surrounding Abrego has created a complex web of litigation in Maryland, where he initially sought asylum, and Tennessee, where the charges against him were brought. The judge has ordered Abrego's lawyers to submit evidence on government motivations behind the charging decision, which could shed light on allegations of vindictiveness.
Abrego's lawyer argues that his prosecution was motivated by retaliation for exercising his constitutional rights in his Maryland immigration case. Crenshaw has agreed that this is not an ordinary case and will review certain materials himself before making a final ruling.
The court's intervention highlights the high stakes involved in Abrego's case, with deportation potentially mootling the criminal proceedings. The administration's efforts to remove him from the US again have raised concerns about its treatment of asylum seekers and potential motives for pursuing charges against Abrego.
US District Judge Waverly Crenshaw has rebuked remarks made by top Trump officials, warning them against making "troubling" and potentially prejudicial statements about Kilmar Abrego Garcia, the defendant at the center of a high-profile deportation case.
The remarks, which were deemed extrajudicial by the judge, were seen as exaggerated and inaccurate, and could have compromised Abrego's right to a fair trial. Homeland Security Secretary Kristi Noem made comments suggesting Abrego was involved in organized crime, while former Attorney General Pam Bondi stated he played a significant role in an alien smuggling ring.
Crenshaw has put these officials "on notice" that making such statements without court permission could result in sanctions. The judge has also granted Abrego's motion to require DOJ and DHS officials to refrain from making prejudicial extrajudicial statements, emphasizing that this is not an ordinary case.
The deportation controversy surrounding Abrego has created a complex web of litigation in Maryland, where he initially sought asylum, and Tennessee, where the charges against him were brought. The judge has ordered Abrego's lawyers to submit evidence on government motivations behind the charging decision, which could shed light on allegations of vindictiveness.
Abrego's lawyer argues that his prosecution was motivated by retaliation for exercising his constitutional rights in his Maryland immigration case. Crenshaw has agreed that this is not an ordinary case and will review certain materials himself before making a final ruling.
The court's intervention highlights the high stakes involved in Abrego's case, with deportation potentially mootling the criminal proceedings. The administration's efforts to remove him from the US again have raised concerns about its treatment of asylum seekers and potential motives for pursuing charges against Abrego.