Labor Groups Sue Trump Admin Over Social Media Surveillance of Non-Citizens
A coalition of labor unions has taken a stand against the Trump administration's social media surveillance program, which it claims is an assault on free speech rights for visa holders and other immigrants who are in the country legally. The lawsuit, filed by the Electronic Frontier Foundation on behalf of the American Federation of Teachers, the Communications Workers of America, and the United Auto Workers, seeks to block the administration's viewpoint-based investigation and surveillance efforts.
The suit alleges that union members' speech is being "chilled" by the threat of adverse immigration action if the government disapproves of their expressions or future expressions. The unions claim that this has resulted in limited union-facing activity due to fear of retributive immigration consequences. The Trump administration's social media surveillance program, which involves scouring platforms for posts it can use to deport visa holders, is seen as a threat to free speech and an overreach of executive power.
The administration's claims that the Supreme Court has granted it immunity from liability under the Immigration and Nationality Act are disputed by the unions. The real issue at play here is not national security but rather a deliberate attempt to silence critics of the administration's policies, including those critical of Israel's government.
Critics have long warned about this kind of surveillance as an attack on free speech. The recent revocation of six visas over social media posts critical of slain MAGA activist Charlie Kirk suggests that the administration is willing to use this program to target anyone whose views it disagrees with.
The Trump administration plans to establish two round-the-clock centers to monitor social media activity, further expanding its reach and capacity for surveillance. While the administration has claimed that its actions are necessary to combat terrorism, critics argue that they amount to a broader assault on free speech rights.
Republicans have largely remained silent on this issue, despite promoting conspiracy theories about the Biden administration's alleged pressure on social media companies to censor users. However, it is now clear that the Trump administration's own actions will not be ignored or swept under the rug.
As one State Department spokesperson, Tommy Pigott, claimed in an email, "The Supreme Court has repeatedly made clear that aliens do not have the same First Amendment rights as American citizens." This statement is at odds with the real law, which recognizes free speech rights for all individuals, regardless of immigration status. The Trump administration's actions demonstrate a willingness to disregard this principle and silence its critics through any means necessary.
A coalition of labor unions has taken a stand against the Trump administration's social media surveillance program, which it claims is an assault on free speech rights for visa holders and other immigrants who are in the country legally. The lawsuit, filed by the Electronic Frontier Foundation on behalf of the American Federation of Teachers, the Communications Workers of America, and the United Auto Workers, seeks to block the administration's viewpoint-based investigation and surveillance efforts.
The suit alleges that union members' speech is being "chilled" by the threat of adverse immigration action if the government disapproves of their expressions or future expressions. The unions claim that this has resulted in limited union-facing activity due to fear of retributive immigration consequences. The Trump administration's social media surveillance program, which involves scouring platforms for posts it can use to deport visa holders, is seen as a threat to free speech and an overreach of executive power.
The administration's claims that the Supreme Court has granted it immunity from liability under the Immigration and Nationality Act are disputed by the unions. The real issue at play here is not national security but rather a deliberate attempt to silence critics of the administration's policies, including those critical of Israel's government.
Critics have long warned about this kind of surveillance as an attack on free speech. The recent revocation of six visas over social media posts critical of slain MAGA activist Charlie Kirk suggests that the administration is willing to use this program to target anyone whose views it disagrees with.
The Trump administration plans to establish two round-the-clock centers to monitor social media activity, further expanding its reach and capacity for surveillance. While the administration has claimed that its actions are necessary to combat terrorism, critics argue that they amount to a broader assault on free speech rights.
Republicans have largely remained silent on this issue, despite promoting conspiracy theories about the Biden administration's alleged pressure on social media companies to censor users. However, it is now clear that the Trump administration's own actions will not be ignored or swept under the rug.
As one State Department spokesperson, Tommy Pigott, claimed in an email, "The Supreme Court has repeatedly made clear that aliens do not have the same First Amendment rights as American citizens." This statement is at odds with the real law, which recognizes free speech rights for all individuals, regardless of immigration status. The Trump administration's actions demonstrate a willingness to disregard this principle and silence its critics through any means necessary.