CBS' '60 Minutes' has faced criticism for featuring Marjorie Taylor Greene on its latest episode, with many arguing that the show is amplifying her extreme views. The congresswoman from Georgia was last seen at a white nationalist event in 2022, but she has managed to move up the ranks of the Republican party over just two years.
During an interview with CBS' Lesley Stahl, Greene shared some of her more radical views, including referring to Democrats as "a party of pedophiles" and downplaying the 2018 Parkland school shooting. However, Stahl did not address Greene's attendance at a white nationalist event or her support for conspiracy theories about the January 6th attack on the US Capitol.
Critics argue that this is a misstep by CBS, which has long been known for featuring "controversial" guests. The network has interviewed Oklahoma City bomber Timothy McVeigh and Iran's Ayatollah Ruhollah Khomeini in the past. However, Greene's views go beyond typical "controversy," with her support for Christian nationalism and anti-Muslim rhetoric.
Many have slammed CBS for what they see as a lack of journalistic integrity. Journalist Molly Jong-Fast called out "60 Minutes" on Twitter, saying that spending time with Greene was like "spending currency" – a stark contrast to when the network would interview guests who share similar values. Adam Kinzinger, a former GOP representative and CNN commentator, also expressed disappointment with CBS for hosting Greene.
David Hogg, who survived the Parkland shooting and has become an activist against gun violence, called out Greene's support for conspiracy theories about school shootings and QAnon. Greene has repeatedly denied that the Parkland shooting was staged.
In response to criticism, Greene praised Stahl on Twitter, saying she respected her "greatly" and that she was a "legendary icon" in journalism. However, this statement seems hollow given her own history of spreading misinformation about the Parkland shooting.
The controversy surrounding CBS' decision to feature Greene raises questions about the network's editorial judgment and commitment to journalistic integrity. Will they continue to host guests who hold extreme views, or will they take a more critical stance?
During an interview with CBS' Lesley Stahl, Greene shared some of her more radical views, including referring to Democrats as "a party of pedophiles" and downplaying the 2018 Parkland school shooting. However, Stahl did not address Greene's attendance at a white nationalist event or her support for conspiracy theories about the January 6th attack on the US Capitol.
Critics argue that this is a misstep by CBS, which has long been known for featuring "controversial" guests. The network has interviewed Oklahoma City bomber Timothy McVeigh and Iran's Ayatollah Ruhollah Khomeini in the past. However, Greene's views go beyond typical "controversy," with her support for Christian nationalism and anti-Muslim rhetoric.
Many have slammed CBS for what they see as a lack of journalistic integrity. Journalist Molly Jong-Fast called out "60 Minutes" on Twitter, saying that spending time with Greene was like "spending currency" – a stark contrast to when the network would interview guests who share similar values. Adam Kinzinger, a former GOP representative and CNN commentator, also expressed disappointment with CBS for hosting Greene.
David Hogg, who survived the Parkland shooting and has become an activist against gun violence, called out Greene's support for conspiracy theories about school shootings and QAnon. Greene has repeatedly denied that the Parkland shooting was staged.
In response to criticism, Greene praised Stahl on Twitter, saying she respected her "greatly" and that she was a "legendary icon" in journalism. However, this statement seems hollow given her own history of spreading misinformation about the Parkland shooting.
The controversy surrounding CBS' decision to feature Greene raises questions about the network's editorial judgment and commitment to journalistic integrity. Will they continue to host guests who hold extreme views, or will they take a more critical stance?