Senate passes federal funding compromise; Democrats score victory in DHS revolt

Senate Democrats scored a major victory on Friday, after Republicans and Democrats agreed to a compromise on federal funding that included key reforms aimed at curbing abuses by Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE). The compromise package was sent to the House on Friday evening, but lawmakers won't be able to vote on it until next week.

The five-bill package includes measures such as requiring judicial warrants for ICE agents to make arrests, rather than administrative warrants, which Democrats see as a critical step towards reducing further incidents of violence by federal agents during immigration operations. The package also includes reforms aimed at limiting the use of force against migrants.

However, Senate Republicans and Democrats agreed to drop the Department of Homeland Security (DHS) funding bill from the package, which means that there is no immediate solution to the funding crisis facing the agency. A partial government shutdown is all but guaranteed after the 71-29 vote in the Senate.

House Speaker Mike Johnson said he expected a decision on the package by Monday at the earliest, three days into the partial shutdown. However, passing the legislation under suspension of the rules could be a pathway to success, allowing it to bypass the House-wide procedural hurdle called a "rule vote".

The House Rules Committee is set to meet for a rare Sunday hearing to consider the bill, which could set up further action as early as Monday. House Republican resistance to the modified package has already fomented among members of the House Freedom Caucus.

"This is not like some wish list," Sen. Tina Smith said on the Senate floor. "This is really practical, commonsense stuff that would actually go a long way towards minimizing the harm that we're seeing in Minnesota."

However, House Freedom Caucus Chair Andy Harris said that delaying full year funding for DHS any further was a bad idea, adding that Democrats' desire to keep millions of illegal aliens in the United States would not suddenly disappear.
 
Just had to sit down and think about this whole ICE thing ๐Ÿค”. As someone who's lived through their fair share of social changes, I gotta say, it's disheartening to see folks on both sides getting worked up over something that seems so straightforward. We're talking about laws, people! Not politics as usual. Can't we all just agree on making sure our agents are following the rules and respecting human rights? ๐Ÿคทโ€โ™€๏ธ It's not rocket science, but it feels like we're stuck in some sort of bureaucratic quagmire. What really gets me is that there are folks out there who think this is just a partisan issue when it shouldn't be ๐Ÿ™„. Let's try to find common ground and make progress on these issues, shall we? ๐Ÿ’ก
 
Ugh I'm so late to this thread lol ๐Ÿ˜‚๐Ÿ™ˆ. Anyway, I think it's super crazy that they were able to agree on some reforms after all that drama. It's about time we see some real change in how ICE operates. I mean, requiring judicial warrants for arrests is a huge step forward ๐Ÿค. And limiting the use of force against migrants? That's just basic human decency.

I'm also kinda annoyed that they dropped the DHS funding bill from the package tho ๐Ÿ˜’. Like, what even is the point of having a partial shutdown now? Just another way to hold people hostage and make them negotiate ๐Ÿคทโ€โ™€๏ธ. I guess we'll just have to wait and see how it all plays out.

I did love Tina Smith's quote tho ๐Ÿ’โ€โ™€๏ธ. She's always been one of those senators who actually gets things done, you know? And Andy Harris is just... well, he's Andy Harris ๐Ÿ˜‚. Always stirring up drama and trying to stir the pot. Let's hope he doesn't manage to screw this whole thing up ๐Ÿคž.
 
๐Ÿค” so its like they agree on some stuff but still got the bigger issue aka no funding for DHS... ๐Ÿค‘ what's the logic here? first they cut DHS from the package then say we can vote on it later? that just seems like a bunch of backpedaling to me ๐Ÿšซ
 
๐Ÿค” I think this compromise package is a step in the right direction towards reducing abuses by ICE. The requirement for judicial warrants instead of administrative ones is a significant win for human rights and accountability. However, I'm skeptical about the fate of the Department of Homeland Security funding bill. Dropping it from the package feels like a missed opportunity to address the root cause of the crisis.

๐Ÿšจ A partial government shutdown is not a solution, but rather a symptom of the ongoing partisan gridlock. It's time for lawmakers to put aside their differences and find common ground. The House Rules Committee meeting on Sunday could be a turning point, but I'm not holding my breath ๐Ÿ™„. We need more than just token reforms; we need systemic changes that address the systemic issues.

๐Ÿ’ก I'd love to see more progressive ideas being pushed forward, like expanding pathways for undocumented immigrants or increasing funding for refugee resettlement programs. The current package feels too watered down, even with the added reforms. Let's hope the next few days bring some real progress ๐Ÿ’ช
 
You know what's crazy? I just saw the weirdest thing on my morning walk ๐Ÿถ - a squirrel with a missing tail! Like, where did it even go?! Anyway, back to this whole immigration thing... I don't get why we need all these rules and regulations. Can't we just, like, have an open conversation about it? I mean, I know there's been some really harsh stuff going on with ICE, but is that really the best way to address the issue? And what's up with the partial government shutdown thing? Like, isn't that just a fancy way of saying "we can't agree on anything"? ๐Ÿคทโ€โ™‚๏ธ Oh, and did I mention I saw a great coffee shop downtown yesterday...
 
can't believe what's goin on ๐Ÿคฏ with this whole immigration thing... i think senate democrats are makin some pretty smart moves here ๐Ÿค“. like, requiring judicial warrants for ICE agents is a game changer ๐Ÿ‘ฎโ€โ™‚๏ธ. it shows they're actually listenin to the concerns of people on both sides of the aisle ๐Ÿ—ฃ๏ธ. and let's be real, limiting the use of force against migrants is a no-brainer ๐Ÿ’ช. we gotta make sure our law enforcement agencies are treatin people with respect, not just sweepin 'em up like they're criminals ๐Ÿšซ. it's about time we started seein some real reform ๐Ÿ’ฅ. hope this compromise package holds up in the house tho ๐Ÿคž... can't take any more partial gov shutdowns ๐Ÿ˜ฉ
 
Omg I'm so late to this thread but I just read about the Senate compromise on ICE reforms ๐Ÿคฏ and I gotta say, it's a huge win for the people! The fact that they're pushing for judicial warrants instead of administrative ones is a game changer, you know? It shows that the system is actually listening to the community and trying to prevent more of these awful incidents where federal agents are using excessive force. And limiting use of force against migrants is also a must! I'm all about that reform ๐Ÿ™Œ
 
๐Ÿค” I'm so down for this compromise on ICE reforms ๐Ÿ™Œ it's about time we have some common sense laws ๐Ÿ‘ฎโ€โ™‚๏ธ๐Ÿ’ก requiring judicial warrants for arrests and limiting force against migrants ๐Ÿšซ๐Ÿ‘ฅ. This is actually something that could make a real difference in reducing violence from federal agents ๐Ÿค. And Sen Tina Smith is totally on point ๐Ÿ’ฏ, this isn't just about "wish list" stuff ๐Ÿ“ it's practical solutions to real problems ๐ŸŒŽ. Can't wait to see the House take action and pass this bill ๐Ÿ›๏ธ๐Ÿ‘!
 
Back
Top