A study has revealed that some US courts are losing trust in the Trump Justice Department, citing a significant increase in cases where judges have criticized the administration's conduct. The research, conducted by Ryan Goodman, a law professor at New York University, examined over 400 lawsuits filed against the administration since President Trump took office.
According to Goodman, the study identified three main categories of cases where courts have expressed concerns about the government's behavior. Firstly, there were instances where judges called out the government for non-compliance with court orders, amounting to over 15 cases. Secondly, some courts had found the government to be providing false or misleading information, including false sworn declarations, in around 35 cases.
The third category involved administrative law disputes where courts made determinations that the government's conduct was arbitrary and capricious, meaning it failed to consider trade-offs or was unreasoned. This category saw over 50 instances of such findings.
What's more striking is that some judges appointed by both Republican and Democratic presidents have criticized the Justice Department's work. The study has since found even more cases where this is the case, including 20 instances where judges questioned the government's compliance with their judicial orders.
Goodman described this trend as "unbelievably shocking" and pointed out that it suggests the Justice Department is engaging in "some of the most abhorrent behavior imaginable". He warned that losing the trust of the courts would have serious consequences for the department, both short-term and long-term. In the short term, the Justice Department relies on the courts to validate its work, while in the long term, it could lead to significant damage to its reputation.
The implications of this trend are far-reaching, with Goodman arguing that it poses a threat to the very foundations of our system of justice. "What's at stake is our system of justice," he said. "I think what's at stake is checks and balances within our system of government." The fact that these concerns are being expressed by judges from different party backgrounds highlights the gravity of the situation.
Ultimately, Goodman's study suggests that the Justice Department's behavior has crossed a critical threshold, eroding the trust between the department and the courts. This could have serious consequences for the administration's ability to carry out its policies and for the integrity of our system of justice as a whole.
According to Goodman, the study identified three main categories of cases where courts have expressed concerns about the government's behavior. Firstly, there were instances where judges called out the government for non-compliance with court orders, amounting to over 15 cases. Secondly, some courts had found the government to be providing false or misleading information, including false sworn declarations, in around 35 cases.
The third category involved administrative law disputes where courts made determinations that the government's conduct was arbitrary and capricious, meaning it failed to consider trade-offs or was unreasoned. This category saw over 50 instances of such findings.
What's more striking is that some judges appointed by both Republican and Democratic presidents have criticized the Justice Department's work. The study has since found even more cases where this is the case, including 20 instances where judges questioned the government's compliance with their judicial orders.
Goodman described this trend as "unbelievably shocking" and pointed out that it suggests the Justice Department is engaging in "some of the most abhorrent behavior imaginable". He warned that losing the trust of the courts would have serious consequences for the department, both short-term and long-term. In the short term, the Justice Department relies on the courts to validate its work, while in the long term, it could lead to significant damage to its reputation.
The implications of this trend are far-reaching, with Goodman arguing that it poses a threat to the very foundations of our system of justice. "What's at stake is our system of justice," he said. "I think what's at stake is checks and balances within our system of government." The fact that these concerns are being expressed by judges from different party backgrounds highlights the gravity of the situation.
Ultimately, Goodman's study suggests that the Justice Department's behavior has crossed a critical threshold, eroding the trust between the department and the courts. This could have serious consequences for the administration's ability to carry out its policies and for the integrity of our system of justice as a whole.
this is getting ugly fam... i mean, seriously, when u think about it, if judges from diff parties are calling out the Trump Justice Dept, that means they're not just blind to it, they're actively seeing the problems. it's like, what's happening behind the scenes? the fact that Goodman found so many cases of non-compliance and false info is wild. and it's not just the dept, the courts themselves are losing trust in the admin. this is a big deal cuz if the justice dept can't be trusted, then how do we know they're doing their job right? 
this is so worrying... if judges from both parties are losing faith in the Justice Department's behavior, that's like a huge red flag 
... imagine what could happen next if they start questioning each other more? 
it's not just about Trump or his administration anymore, it's about our entire justice system 
... we need to keep an eye on this and make sure everyone is held accountable for their actions 
.
this is crazy what's going on with the Trump Justice Department judges are losing trust in them big time over 400 lawsuits and they're still finding issues like non compliance with orders and false info being given 
it's not just republicans who are criticizing them either, even some democrats have spoken out. this is serious business if the courts don't trust the Justice Department what's gonna happen to their policies and our system of justice as a whole? 
.
] i made a little diagram to illustrate this:
] what's worrying me is that this erosion of trust could have serious consequences for the entire system 
. if the courts don't trust the Justice Department, it could lead to some major issues with policy implementation and even the integrity of our justice system 
.
.
.
. I'm calling BS on this whole thing, but at the same time, I gotta wonder if there's some truth to it... maybe? 
. It's not just Republicans or Democrats who are speaking out, either - even judges from both sides are calling BS 
. Goodman says it's "unbelievably shocking" and that losing the courts' trust could be devastating for the Justice Department in the long run 
.
. But seriously, this is a major problem - if the courts lose trust in the department, it can't just magically fix itself 
.
.
The long-term consequences of this trend could be disastrous, and I'm all about checking and balancing power, so this is a big deal indeed 
.
. Like, how does that even happen? It's not like they're trying to cover up something or anything... right? 
.