Trans activists say hostile rallies are becoming the norm as US Supreme Court hears case on trans youth in sports.
In Washington DC, competing groups of hundreds of people gathered on Tuesday to voice their opinions on a landmark case before the supreme court. The case revolves around whether transgender children can participate in school sports, potentially impacting LGBTQ+ civil rights protections more broadly.
The rally was dominated by two opposing groups: one supporting trans rights and the other calling for laws that prohibit trans youth from participating in sports aligned with their gender identity. The latter group was described as "mostly white" and appeared to have a visible shift in tone, size and aggression.
"I'm here to tell you that we're not going anywhere," said J Gia Loving, co-executive director of the Gay Straight Alliance Network, after being released by Capitol Police following an altercation with another activist.
According to advocates, hostility towards trans rights has increased at rallies, as some groups have become more organized in their efforts to roll back LGBTQ+ rights. Some activists believe that conservative efforts may be driving this trend, possibly due to a push to sway Democrats away from supporting trans youth in sports.
Experts argue that the real issue here is not women's sports but power and control. "This hyper-focus on sports is yet another example of how they're trying to erase trans and non-binary people from public life," said Chris Mosier, an internationally ranked triathlete who came out as trans in 2010.
The US Supreme Court hearing marks the latest chapter in a long-standing battle for LGBTQ+ rights. Advocates say this case could have far-reaching implications for trans youth and their families, potentially leading to further restrictions on trans rights if the court rules in favor of the state bans.
As activists continued to dance, chant and support each other at the rally for trans rights, one attendee expressed anger that a ban would be enacted "to protect" anyone or anything. Another asked: "If they wanted to help us, why wouldn't they just ask us?"
Despite confrontations and disruptions, the energy at the rally remained positive, with speakers reminding listeners of their ancestors and resilience. "We might lose battle after battle," said Loving, "but after 500 years of this project to erase us, we are still here, and that matters."
In Washington DC, competing groups of hundreds of people gathered on Tuesday to voice their opinions on a landmark case before the supreme court. The case revolves around whether transgender children can participate in school sports, potentially impacting LGBTQ+ civil rights protections more broadly.
The rally was dominated by two opposing groups: one supporting trans rights and the other calling for laws that prohibit trans youth from participating in sports aligned with their gender identity. The latter group was described as "mostly white" and appeared to have a visible shift in tone, size and aggression.
"I'm here to tell you that we're not going anywhere," said J Gia Loving, co-executive director of the Gay Straight Alliance Network, after being released by Capitol Police following an altercation with another activist.
According to advocates, hostility towards trans rights has increased at rallies, as some groups have become more organized in their efforts to roll back LGBTQ+ rights. Some activists believe that conservative efforts may be driving this trend, possibly due to a push to sway Democrats away from supporting trans youth in sports.
Experts argue that the real issue here is not women's sports but power and control. "This hyper-focus on sports is yet another example of how they're trying to erase trans and non-binary people from public life," said Chris Mosier, an internationally ranked triathlete who came out as trans in 2010.
The US Supreme Court hearing marks the latest chapter in a long-standing battle for LGBTQ+ rights. Advocates say this case could have far-reaching implications for trans youth and their families, potentially leading to further restrictions on trans rights if the court rules in favor of the state bans.
As activists continued to dance, chant and support each other at the rally for trans rights, one attendee expressed anger that a ban would be enacted "to protect" anyone or anything. Another asked: "If they wanted to help us, why wouldn't they just ask us?"
Despite confrontations and disruptions, the energy at the rally remained positive, with speakers reminding listeners of their ancestors and resilience. "We might lose battle after battle," said Loving, "but after 500 years of this project to erase us, we are still here, and that matters."