US Strikes Against Civilian Boats Reach New Heights in Pacific Ocean, Raises Questions About Lawfulness.
A deadly trend of US military strikes against civilian boats has escalated to the Pacific Ocean, killing dozens of people. Seven weeks ago, President Donald Trump authorized a strike that killed 11 people on a boat in international waters, with no evidence presented to justify the operation. The White House claimed the targets were smuggling drugs destined for the US market, but this claim was met with skepticism from lawmakers and experts alike.
Since then, five more strikes have taken place, each resulting in significant loss of life. In late Tuesday's strike, two or three people were killed off the coast of Colombia in the eastern Pacific Ocean. The total death toll is now estimated to be around 32, but some question whether this figure is accurate and if there have been other unannounced strikes.
Critics argue that these operations are a blatant disregard for international law, as civilians are being deliberately targeted even when they are not directly participating in hostilities. A broad range of legal experts have weighed in, stating that the US military's actions fall under international law and that such deliberate targeting is considered an act of war.
The White House has largely ignored calls from lawmakers to provide evidence to justify these operations, further fueling concerns about the legitimacy of the strikes. In one notable case, Ecuador released a man who was targeted by Trump in exchange for $4 million in aid, sparking accusations of a quid pro quo deal.
The lack of congressional oversight on this matter is alarming, as lawmakers are unable to launch thorough investigations into these operations. The Republican majority has allowed President Trump to operate with impunity, even going so far as to allow him to serve as both judge and jury for civilians in international waters.
As the death toll continues to rise, it remains to be seen how long this trend will continue without any meaningful accountability from the White House or Congress.
A deadly trend of US military strikes against civilian boats has escalated to the Pacific Ocean, killing dozens of people. Seven weeks ago, President Donald Trump authorized a strike that killed 11 people on a boat in international waters, with no evidence presented to justify the operation. The White House claimed the targets were smuggling drugs destined for the US market, but this claim was met with skepticism from lawmakers and experts alike.
Since then, five more strikes have taken place, each resulting in significant loss of life. In late Tuesday's strike, two or three people were killed off the coast of Colombia in the eastern Pacific Ocean. The total death toll is now estimated to be around 32, but some question whether this figure is accurate and if there have been other unannounced strikes.
Critics argue that these operations are a blatant disregard for international law, as civilians are being deliberately targeted even when they are not directly participating in hostilities. A broad range of legal experts have weighed in, stating that the US military's actions fall under international law and that such deliberate targeting is considered an act of war.
The White House has largely ignored calls from lawmakers to provide evidence to justify these operations, further fueling concerns about the legitimacy of the strikes. In one notable case, Ecuador released a man who was targeted by Trump in exchange for $4 million in aid, sparking accusations of a quid pro quo deal.
The lack of congressional oversight on this matter is alarming, as lawmakers are unable to launch thorough investigations into these operations. The Republican majority has allowed President Trump to operate with impunity, even going so far as to allow him to serve as both judge and jury for civilians in international waters.
As the death toll continues to rise, it remains to be seen how long this trend will continue without any meaningful accountability from the White House or Congress.