President Trump's Use of Government Shutdown as a Tool to Make Life Tougher for Millions of Workers
In an effort to gain leverage over congressional Democrats in the ongoing government shutdown, President Trump has adopted a callous calculus that benefits him at the expense of millions of workers and their families. By employing this approach, Trump is not only hurting vulnerable Americans but also potentially violating federal law.
One of the most egregious examples of this strategy is the Trump administration's decision to cut off funding for the Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program (SNAP), also known as food stamps, effective Saturday. This move will severely impact 42 million people - one-eighth of the US population - who rely on SNAP benefits to put food on the table.
Despite assurances by the administration that contingency funds could be used to finance continued food benefits after November 1, it has now decided not to do so. The rationale behind this decision is dubious, as it claims that such funding can only be used for natural disasters, despite previous statements indicating otherwise.
This move will undoubtedly lead to increased hunger among millions of Americans, particularly low-wage workers and vulnerable communities. As Governor JB Pritzker of Illinois pointed out, "Working families are about to go without food assistance because Trump and congressional Republicans want to score political points and refuse to reach a deal."
Not only is the SNAP cutoff anti-worker, but it also raises serious questions about the constitutionality of the administration's actions. Legal experts argue that using contingency funding for anything other than natural disasters is not only permissible but essential.
Furthermore, President Trump has used this shutdown as an opportunity to threaten the backpay of 670,000 furloughed federal workers, a move widely seen as a strong-arm tactic to pressure congressional Democrats into agreeing to reopen the government and drop their demand to extend Obamacare subsidies. The administration's stance on this matter is at odds with its own previous legislation, which guaranteed retroactive pay for federal workers during shutdowns.
In another anti-worker move, President Trump has seized on the shutdown to announce permanent layoffs of 4,000 federal workers, a move that has sparked controversy among labor unions and experts. The injunction issued by Susan Illston, a federal district court judge in San Francisco, temporarily blocking these layoffs, highlights the illegality of such actions.
Throughout this ordeal, President Trump's actions have been characterized as cold, cruel, and calculating towards working-class Americans. By exploiting the shutdown to impose his will on vulnerable communities, he has demonstrated a callous disregard for their well-being. As Liz Shuler, president of the AFL-CIO labor federation, noted, "This is a government that is by, and for, the CEOs and billionaires."
In contrast, any president who truly cared about American workers would take immediate action to address their concerns, such as extending Obamacare subsidies. By failing to do so, President Trump has left millions of Americans worried and without support during this critical period.
				
			In an effort to gain leverage over congressional Democrats in the ongoing government shutdown, President Trump has adopted a callous calculus that benefits him at the expense of millions of workers and their families. By employing this approach, Trump is not only hurting vulnerable Americans but also potentially violating federal law.
One of the most egregious examples of this strategy is the Trump administration's decision to cut off funding for the Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program (SNAP), also known as food stamps, effective Saturday. This move will severely impact 42 million people - one-eighth of the US population - who rely on SNAP benefits to put food on the table.
Despite assurances by the administration that contingency funds could be used to finance continued food benefits after November 1, it has now decided not to do so. The rationale behind this decision is dubious, as it claims that such funding can only be used for natural disasters, despite previous statements indicating otherwise.
This move will undoubtedly lead to increased hunger among millions of Americans, particularly low-wage workers and vulnerable communities. As Governor JB Pritzker of Illinois pointed out, "Working families are about to go without food assistance because Trump and congressional Republicans want to score political points and refuse to reach a deal."
Not only is the SNAP cutoff anti-worker, but it also raises serious questions about the constitutionality of the administration's actions. Legal experts argue that using contingency funding for anything other than natural disasters is not only permissible but essential.
Furthermore, President Trump has used this shutdown as an opportunity to threaten the backpay of 670,000 furloughed federal workers, a move widely seen as a strong-arm tactic to pressure congressional Democrats into agreeing to reopen the government and drop their demand to extend Obamacare subsidies. The administration's stance on this matter is at odds with its own previous legislation, which guaranteed retroactive pay for federal workers during shutdowns.
In another anti-worker move, President Trump has seized on the shutdown to announce permanent layoffs of 4,000 federal workers, a move that has sparked controversy among labor unions and experts. The injunction issued by Susan Illston, a federal district court judge in San Francisco, temporarily blocking these layoffs, highlights the illegality of such actions.
Throughout this ordeal, President Trump's actions have been characterized as cold, cruel, and calculating towards working-class Americans. By exploiting the shutdown to impose his will on vulnerable communities, he has demonstrated a callous disregard for their well-being. As Liz Shuler, president of the AFL-CIO labor federation, noted, "This is a government that is by, and for, the CEOs and billionaires."
In contrast, any president who truly cared about American workers would take immediate action to address their concerns, such as extending Obamacare subsidies. By failing to do so, President Trump has left millions of Americans worried and without support during this critical period.