Trump says the lesson from Minneapolis is to use a "softer touch" in federal immigration enforcement

President Trump has revealed that the recent tragic incident in Minneapolis, where two Americans were fatally shot by federal immigration officers, has taught him a valuable lesson - to use a "softer touch" when dealing with immigration enforcement. The president made this statement during an interview with NBC News.

Trump acknowledged that while the federal operation in Minnesota was necessary, he now realizes that being too tough may not be the most effective approach. He believes that using a softer touch can help reduce tensions and prevent similar incidents from occurring in the future.

However, Trump emphasized that being "tough" is also essential when it comes to immigration enforcement. He wants to ensure that those who pose a threat to national security are held accountable.

The president's comments come as investigations into the deaths of RenΓ©e Good and Alex Pretti continue. The two Americans were shot by federal immigration officers while driving their cars, sparking widespread outrage and calls for reform.

Trump has also announced plans to cut the number of federal immigration agents in Minneapolis by 700. This decision was made in an effort to reduce tensions between county officials and federal immigration enforcement agencies.

The president's remarks have been met with skepticism from some lawmakers, including Minnesota Governor Tim Walz and Minneapolis Mayor Jacob Frey, who have criticized the administration's immigration crackdown in the city.

Trump has also taken issue with the criticism from local leaders, saying that he has had positive conversations with them but sees them as being dishonest. The president believes that his policies are designed to keep America safe, even if it means taking a tougher stance on immigration enforcement.

As the investigation into the deaths of Good and Pretti continues, Trump's comments have raised questions about the effectiveness of the federal immigration operation in Minnesota and whether a softer approach might be more effective in preventing similar incidents from occurring.
 
I'm not sure I buy this whole "softer touch" thing πŸ€”... sounds like just another PR stunt to me πŸ˜’. We all know how well his rhetoric usually turns out, right? πŸ’Έ And what's with the 700+ federal immigration agents getting cut from Minneapolis? That just means more of them will be pouring into other cities, creating even more tension and problems 🚫. I don't trust this guy at all... he's always making promises that never come to fruition πŸ™„.
 
omg u guys i cant even believe what trump just said 🀯 he thinks using a "softer touch" on immigration enforcement will help reduce tensions? like, isnt that just code for "we're gonna let people stay" πŸ™…β€β™‚οΈ i mean idk about u but this sounds super suspicious to me. and 700 fewer immigration agents in minneapolis sounds like a huge mistake πŸ€¦β€β™€οΈ those ppl are scared already. what if it just makes the problem worse? 🚨 i dunno what trump is thinking rn but i hope they get to the bottom of that minnesota thing ASAP πŸ’”
 
πŸ™„ I mean, can you believe this? The guy who's always talking about building walls is now saying we need to be softer on immigration enforcement? It's like, what's the deal with that? πŸ€·β€β™‚οΈ I think it's great that he's finally listening to the criticism and taking a step back, but at the same time, I'm worried that this is just a PR stunt to make himself look more reasonable. Newsflash: being "tough" on immigration isn't always the answer, but using a softer touch might actually be what we need in some cases. Maybe we should try to find a middle ground instead of just taking extreme measures all the time? πŸ€”
 
just saw this πŸ€¦β€β™‚οΈ... can't believe trump is trying to spin a "softer touch" after 2 ppl got killed by fed immigration officers. how is that even possible? πŸ™„ and 700 less agents in minneapolis is just gonna make things worse, like they'll just get creative with their tactics. this whole thing is super sus πŸ˜’
 
I dont know man, this is a total mess 🀯. I mean, come on, 700 fewer agents? That just means more loopholes for people to exploit, you know? And Trumps all about being "tough" on immigration now? After basically letting it run wild for years... what's the point of even having some semblance of control if he's not gonna follow through? πŸ€·β€β™‚οΈ
 
Ugh, come on NBC News! Can't you do better than just letting him go off script like that? πŸ™„ I mean, I get it, Trump wants to spin this whole thing as some kind of "learning experience" but seriously, two people dead and he's trying to soft-sell the fact that his agents are a menace? πŸ€¦β€β™‚οΈ And now he's cutting more agents because...because...who knows why? πŸ˜’ Can't we just have an honest conversation about immigration reform for once?

And what's up with all the double-speak from Trump? "Tough" but also "soft touch"? What's that even supposed to mean? πŸ€” And don't even get me started on the Governors and Mayors who are getting roasted for speaking truth to power. It's like, can we please just have some real dialogue about these issues instead of all this back-and-forth BS? πŸ’”
 
πŸ€” So, what do you think? Can't believe Trump is now saying he wants to use a "softer touch" when it comes to immigration enforcement... after two Americans were killed by federal immigration officers. It's like, isn't that exactly the opposite of what he was trying to do all along? And why cut 700 immigration agents in Minneapolis if you want to keep the city safe? Doesn't seem very logical to me... πŸ€·β€β™€οΈ Maybe Trump just wants to avoid more bad publicity at this point. But what about the people who are actually threatening national security? Shouldn't they be, like, held accountable too? πŸ˜•
 
I'm surprised he finally figured that out... like it was never obvious to him πŸ˜’πŸ™„. 700 fewer agents? Maybe that's what we need to reduce all the unnecessary drama around here. I mean, who needs more tension between local officials and federal agencies? πŸ€·β€β™€οΈ It's not like a "softer touch" is going to solve everything or make people less worried about their safety when faced with real threats from immigration authorities πŸ™…β€β™‚οΈ. The guy really thinks being tough on immigration means keeping America safe... meanwhile, he's still not addressing the systemic issues that led to those tragic incidents πŸ’”.
 
πŸ€” I'm not sure if Trump really gets it... using a "softer touch" on immigration enforcement is just a fancy way of saying you're gonna let people slip through the cracks πŸ™…β€β™‚οΈ. And cutting 700 agents in Minneapolis? That's just gonna make things worse, especially with all these gang-related issues 🀯. I mean, what's the plan here? Just 'talk' to these gangs and expect them to magically become law-abiding citizens? It's not that simple πŸ’Έ. Trump needs to stop grandstanding and actually work on solutions, not just spin this as a PR stunt πŸ“Ί.
 
πŸ€” I'm not sure if President Trump's "softer touch" is going to fly with everyone. I mean, on one hand, it's good that he's acknowledging the importance of reducing tensions and preventing similar incidents from happening again. But at the same time, 700 fewer federal immigration agents in Minneapolis? That's a pretty big cut. What's going to happen to the people who need help?

I also think it's interesting that Trump is saying he had positive conversations with local leaders, but they're still criticizing his policies. It feels like there's a bit of a disconnect between what he's saying and what's really going on.

And can we talk about how these two Americans were fatally shot by federal immigration officers? πŸ€• That's just devastating. I hope the investigation into their deaths finds out exactly what happened and who was responsible.
 
Wow! 🀯 I mean, it's interesting how one tragedy can make someone change their tune so much. He went from being super tough on immigration to wanting to use a "softer touch". Does he really think that'll fix everything? 700 fewer agents in Minneapolis might be a good start, but what about the people who are actually hurting others or national security? πŸ€”
 
πŸ€” I don't really buy this "softer touch" stuff from Trump πŸ™„. I mean, come on, two people got killed by ICE agents in broad daylight and he's like "oh no, maybe I was a bit too tough"? 🚫 It doesn't feel right to me. And now he's trying to cut 700 immigration agents in Minneapolis? That just sounds like more token concessions without any actual concrete changes πŸ€·β€β™‚οΈ. I'm not sure what's going on here, but I think Trump needs to be held accountable for this mess πŸ‘Š
 
I'm still trying to wrap my head around this πŸ€”. I mean, I get what Trump is saying - being "tough" on immigration can be super scary for people who are already vulnerable, but at the same time, we do need to keep our country safe right? πŸ’‘ But reducing tensions by being a bit softer doesn't have to mean letting anyone off the hook. Like, what's the balance point here? πŸ€·β€β™€οΈ It feels like Trump is trying to own his mistakes and claim that he's learned from them, but at the same time, he's still not backing down on his stance on immigration enforcement. And can we talk about how weird it is that 700 fewer agents is just going to magically make everything better? 🚫 It's like he's just trying to spin this whole thing and avoid taking actual responsibility. πŸ˜’
 
Back
Top