Trump's 'War' on 'Drug Boats' Reveals a Long-Abandoned Principle: The Inevitability of Unchecked Executive Power.
The Trump administration has taken the U.S. military's strikes against alleged drug smugglers in international waters to unprecedented levels, launching a series of deadly attacks without clear evidence that the targets were even carrying drugs or posed an imminent threat to American interests. This brazen disregard for due process and civilian lives serves as a stark reminder of the dangers of unchecked executive power.
Critics point out that this latest campaign bears striking similarities to President Barack Obama's drone strikes during his time in office, which similarly used "signature" tactics to identify potential terrorists without knowing their identities. The underlying principle behind these programs – raining death down on targets deemed suspicious by a pre-defined set of criteria – has proven disastrous.
In 2017, when Donald Trump first took office, he immediately moved to dismantle many of the constraints placed on the drone program by his predecessor, resulting in a sharp increase in drone strikes and a corresponding lack of transparency about civilian casualties. Since then, President Joe Biden has taken a more measured approach, signing a classified policy aimed at limiting counterterrorism drone strikes outside conventional war zones.
Yet, with Trump's return to office, this trend appears to have reversed. The White House seems content to operate under the assumption that these strikes are justified by the concept of "self-defense," a principle that does not apply in this context. Instead, it is likely an attempt to circumvent any opposition from Congress or the courts.
The administration's cavalier attitude towards the law and accuracy has resulted in a lack of scrutiny for whose bodies wash up on foreign shores – as long as they provide a visible demonstration of American military might against a perceived enemy that doesn't even know it's being targeted.
The Trump administration has taken the U.S. military's strikes against alleged drug smugglers in international waters to unprecedented levels, launching a series of deadly attacks without clear evidence that the targets were even carrying drugs or posed an imminent threat to American interests. This brazen disregard for due process and civilian lives serves as a stark reminder of the dangers of unchecked executive power.
Critics point out that this latest campaign bears striking similarities to President Barack Obama's drone strikes during his time in office, which similarly used "signature" tactics to identify potential terrorists without knowing their identities. The underlying principle behind these programs – raining death down on targets deemed suspicious by a pre-defined set of criteria – has proven disastrous.
In 2017, when Donald Trump first took office, he immediately moved to dismantle many of the constraints placed on the drone program by his predecessor, resulting in a sharp increase in drone strikes and a corresponding lack of transparency about civilian casualties. Since then, President Joe Biden has taken a more measured approach, signing a classified policy aimed at limiting counterterrorism drone strikes outside conventional war zones.
Yet, with Trump's return to office, this trend appears to have reversed. The White House seems content to operate under the assumption that these strikes are justified by the concept of "self-defense," a principle that does not apply in this context. Instead, it is likely an attempt to circumvent any opposition from Congress or the courts.
The administration's cavalier attitude towards the law and accuracy has resulted in a lack of scrutiny for whose bodies wash up on foreign shores – as long as they provide a visible demonstration of American military might against a perceived enemy that doesn't even know it's being targeted.