US-based advocacy group International Rights Advocates has filed a lawsuit against tech giant Apple, accusing it of using minerals linked to human rights abuses and conflict in the Democratic Republic of Congo (DRC) and Rwanda despite the company's denials.
The group claims that Apple's supply chain still includes cobalt, tin, tantalum, and tungsten - key components used in iPhones and other devices - which are sourced from mines controlled by armed groups. According to IRAdvocates, these minerals were obtained through smuggling routes involving Chinese smelters, including Ningxia Orient, JiuJiang JinXin, and Jiujiang Tanbre.
The lawsuit alleges that despite Apple's claims of having strict supplier codes and audits in place, the company continues to source materials linked to forced and child labour. IRAdvocates cites a University of Nottingham study published in 2025, which found evidence of forced and child labour at DRC sites linked to Apple suppliers.
Apple has repeatedly denied any wrongdoing, stating that it has instructed its suppliers to halt sourcing from conflict zones and neighbouring Rwanda. The company claims to have recycled 76% of cobalt in its devices in 2024 but alleges that IRAdvocates' accounting method allows mixing with ore from conflict zones.
The lawsuit seeks a determination by the court that Apple's conduct violates consumer protection law, an injunction to halt alleged deceptive marketing, and reimbursement of legal costs. However, it does not seek monetary damages or class certification.
This latest development follows previous lawsuits filed by IRAdvocates against Tesla, which was dismissed last year. French prosecutors in December also dropped a case filed by the DRC against Apple subsidiaries over conflict minerals due to lack of evidence. A related criminal complaint in Belgium is still under investigation.
The group claims that Apple's supply chain still includes cobalt, tin, tantalum, and tungsten - key components used in iPhones and other devices - which are sourced from mines controlled by armed groups. According to IRAdvocates, these minerals were obtained through smuggling routes involving Chinese smelters, including Ningxia Orient, JiuJiang JinXin, and Jiujiang Tanbre.
The lawsuit alleges that despite Apple's claims of having strict supplier codes and audits in place, the company continues to source materials linked to forced and child labour. IRAdvocates cites a University of Nottingham study published in 2025, which found evidence of forced and child labour at DRC sites linked to Apple suppliers.
Apple has repeatedly denied any wrongdoing, stating that it has instructed its suppliers to halt sourcing from conflict zones and neighbouring Rwanda. The company claims to have recycled 76% of cobalt in its devices in 2024 but alleges that IRAdvocates' accounting method allows mixing with ore from conflict zones.
The lawsuit seeks a determination by the court that Apple's conduct violates consumer protection law, an injunction to halt alleged deceptive marketing, and reimbursement of legal costs. However, it does not seek monetary damages or class certification.
This latest development follows previous lawsuits filed by IRAdvocates against Tesla, which was dismissed last year. French prosecutors in December also dropped a case filed by the DRC against Apple subsidiaries over conflict minerals due to lack of evidence. A related criminal complaint in Belgium is still under investigation.