US President Donald Trump's long-awaited 28-point peace plan aimed at ending the conflict between Russia and Ukraine has sent shockwaves throughout Kyiv, with Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy expressing deep reservations about the proposal. The plan, which would see Ukraine cede territory to Moscow in exchange for a potential permanent deal with Russia, has raised serious concerns among Ukraine's European allies.
According to sources close to the negotiations, Trump's administration had initially set a November 27 deadline for Ukraine to accept the peace plan, but after pushback from European leaders, Washington appears to have softened its stance. The US President claimed that the plan was not a "final offer" for Ukraine, leaving room for further negotiation and potentially paving the way for a more collaborative approach.
However, many in Europe remain skeptical about Trump's intentions, viewing the 28-point plan as an attempt by Moscow to gain territory at the expense of Ukraine. European leaders have expressed concerns that the proposal would not address Ukraine's security concerns, and some have questioned whether it truly represents a "peace" plan or simply a capitulation to Russian demands.
German Chancellor Friedrich Merz has stated that any peace plan must ensure Ukraine's sovereignty and territorial integrity, while UK Prime Minister Keir Starmer has warned that Russia cannot be rewarded with territory for invading Ukraine. French President Emmanuel Macron has also expressed concerns about the proposal, stating that it requires "additional work" to strengthen its elements.
Ukrainian officials, including presidential office chief Andriy Yermak and top envoy Rustem Umerov, have been empowered to deal directly with Russia by the president and will be participating in the Geneva talks alongside US Secretary of State Marco Rubio and Special Envoy Steve Witkoff. National security advisers from the E3 alliance, as well as officials from the European Union, Italy, and other countries, are also expected to join the discussions.
The talks, which could potentially provide a decisive moment for Ukraine, aim to reconcile the contentious draft peace plan with Kyiv's long-term security interests. Ukrainian President Zelenskyy has emphasized the need for a "constructive" approach, stating that his country will continue to work towards achieving a real and lasting peace.
While some in Washington appear to believe that Trump's peace plan could lay the foundation for a final settlement, many others are skeptical about its prospects. With US Vice President JD Vance warning that any failure to achieve success would be due to "failed diplomats or politicians living in a fantasy land," it remains to be seen whether Trump's team will be able to broker a breakthrough in Geneva.
One thing is certain: Ukraine's fate hangs precariously in the balance, and the outcome of these high-stakes talks could have far-reaching consequences for the region.
According to sources close to the negotiations, Trump's administration had initially set a November 27 deadline for Ukraine to accept the peace plan, but after pushback from European leaders, Washington appears to have softened its stance. The US President claimed that the plan was not a "final offer" for Ukraine, leaving room for further negotiation and potentially paving the way for a more collaborative approach.
However, many in Europe remain skeptical about Trump's intentions, viewing the 28-point plan as an attempt by Moscow to gain territory at the expense of Ukraine. European leaders have expressed concerns that the proposal would not address Ukraine's security concerns, and some have questioned whether it truly represents a "peace" plan or simply a capitulation to Russian demands.
German Chancellor Friedrich Merz has stated that any peace plan must ensure Ukraine's sovereignty and territorial integrity, while UK Prime Minister Keir Starmer has warned that Russia cannot be rewarded with territory for invading Ukraine. French President Emmanuel Macron has also expressed concerns about the proposal, stating that it requires "additional work" to strengthen its elements.
Ukrainian officials, including presidential office chief Andriy Yermak and top envoy Rustem Umerov, have been empowered to deal directly with Russia by the president and will be participating in the Geneva talks alongside US Secretary of State Marco Rubio and Special Envoy Steve Witkoff. National security advisers from the E3 alliance, as well as officials from the European Union, Italy, and other countries, are also expected to join the discussions.
The talks, which could potentially provide a decisive moment for Ukraine, aim to reconcile the contentious draft peace plan with Kyiv's long-term security interests. Ukrainian President Zelenskyy has emphasized the need for a "constructive" approach, stating that his country will continue to work towards achieving a real and lasting peace.
While some in Washington appear to believe that Trump's peace plan could lay the foundation for a final settlement, many others are skeptical about its prospects. With US Vice President JD Vance warning that any failure to achieve success would be due to "failed diplomats or politicians living in a fantasy land," it remains to be seen whether Trump's team will be able to broker a breakthrough in Geneva.
One thing is certain: Ukraine's fate hangs precariously in the balance, and the outcome of these high-stakes talks could have far-reaching consequences for the region.
ukraine should be super careful about this. if we're talking about a "peace" plan, it should definitely include Ukraine's sovereignty and territorial integrity - not just some token gesture from the west to appease moscow 
ukraine's leaders are probably right to be skeptical, especially after all the broken promises we've heard so far. it's too early to tell if this plan will actually lead to real peace or just more trouble down the line 
I think this whole plan from Trump sounds super sketchy 
. And what's up with the "not a final offer" thing? Sounds like they just want an excuse to keep pushing for more territory 
. Can't believe the EU is being so skeptical too, though - it's about time we stand up for Ukraine and make sure Russia doesn't get away with this 
. What do you guys think is gonna happen in these talks?
I'm all about layout, you know? And this peace plan from Trump has got me thinking... it looks like a messy table 
with too many conflicting pieces. On one side, we've got Ukraine ceding territory to Russia, which just doesn't sit right with me 
. Then on the other side, we've got European leaders pushing for Ukraine's sovereignty and territorial integrity 
. And let's not forget Trump's claim that it's not a "final offer" – talk about ambiguity 
. I mean, what if Ukraine doesn't want to cede territory? What if Russia isn't interested in negotiating? It's all just so... complicated 
. And have you seen the timeline for these talks? November 27 deadline, and now it's being pushed back? That's like a game of Jenga – one wrong move and everything comes crashing down 
. Maybe Trump's team can take a step back, breathe, and come up with something that actually works for everyone involved 
. Until then, it's just going to be a big ol' mess 
.
the US just wants to be seen as a peacemaker but it's coming off as just another way for Russia to get what they want without having to pay the price 
it's like no one is really thinking about the long-term consequences here, just trying to get a quick fix for a problem that's been brewing for years 
. Can't we just focus on finding a long-term solution that doesn't involve giving up land? 
... but I'm keeping my fingers crossed that they'll be able to find a solution that doesn't leave anyone feeling like they've been sold out 
.
. We need to stop thinking about what others want & focus on finding solutions that work for everyone 
.