A growing number of veterans have flocked to the office of Rep. Chrissy Houlahan (D-PA) since a video surfaced showing her and five other Democratic lawmakers advising service members that they could refuse illegal orders from President Donald Trump.
The six lawmakers, all veterans themselves, released the video in an effort to reassure military personnel that their rights are protected. The backlash against the group has been swift, with Trump calling them "traitors" and Secretary of War Pete Hegseth urging Navy Secretary John Phelan to review one senator's comments in the clip.
Despite the criticism, Houlahan says she received a steady stream of supportive voicemails from veterans across the country. The messages praised her and her colleagues for standing up for military members at a time when they needed it most. Many of those calling in identified themselves as veterans themselves, including Marine vets, infantry vets, and even descendants of World War I, World War II, Vietnam, and Korea.
"I am not a constituent," one veteran said. "I am a veteran." Another caller expressed gratitude for Houlahan's comments, saying they were right on the money. Several others thanked her for standing firmly with military members and assured her that she has their support.
The White House, however, dismissed the lawmakers' concerns as unfounded. In a statement, White House spokeswoman Abigail Jackson said there had been no unlawful orders given by Trump or the Pentagon, and that Democrats like Houlahan were unable to list any examples of such orders when asked.
However, Houlahan disagrees, saying that President Trump is using the FBI as a tool to intimidate and harass members of Congress. She reiterated her commitment to standing up for military members and honoring the Constitution, even in the face of opposition from the president and his allies.
The controversy has sparked a wider debate about the role of military personnel in refusing orders from their superiors, particularly in cases where those orders may be seen as unlawful or unjust. While some have praised Houlahan's stance as courageous and patriotic, others have criticized her for putting party politics above national security concerns.
As the situation continues to unfold, it remains to be seen whether Houlahan's support will continue to grow among veterans and other Americans who value her commitment to standing up for those who serve.
The six lawmakers, all veterans themselves, released the video in an effort to reassure military personnel that their rights are protected. The backlash against the group has been swift, with Trump calling them "traitors" and Secretary of War Pete Hegseth urging Navy Secretary John Phelan to review one senator's comments in the clip.
Despite the criticism, Houlahan says she received a steady stream of supportive voicemails from veterans across the country. The messages praised her and her colleagues for standing up for military members at a time when they needed it most. Many of those calling in identified themselves as veterans themselves, including Marine vets, infantry vets, and even descendants of World War I, World War II, Vietnam, and Korea.
"I am not a constituent," one veteran said. "I am a veteran." Another caller expressed gratitude for Houlahan's comments, saying they were right on the money. Several others thanked her for standing firmly with military members and assured her that she has their support.
The White House, however, dismissed the lawmakers' concerns as unfounded. In a statement, White House spokeswoman Abigail Jackson said there had been no unlawful orders given by Trump or the Pentagon, and that Democrats like Houlahan were unable to list any examples of such orders when asked.
However, Houlahan disagrees, saying that President Trump is using the FBI as a tool to intimidate and harass members of Congress. She reiterated her commitment to standing up for military members and honoring the Constitution, even in the face of opposition from the president and his allies.
The controversy has sparked a wider debate about the role of military personnel in refusing orders from their superiors, particularly in cases where those orders may be seen as unlawful or unjust. While some have praised Houlahan's stance as courageous and patriotic, others have criticized her for putting party politics above national security concerns.
As the situation continues to unfold, it remains to be seen whether Houlahan's support will continue to grow among veterans and other Americans who value her commitment to standing up for those who serve.