The US has finally recognized the war on drugs for what it is - a matter of national security, not just law enforcement. For decades, Washington has approached this crisis with hesitation and half-measures, treating cartels as nothing more than ordinary traffickers to be prosecuted rather than as enemies that have to be defeated.
But now, under President Trump's leadership, the US government has drawn a clear line between criminality and warfare by designating major drug cartels as foreign terrorist organizations and authorizing the use of military force against them. This approach is long overdue, given the devastating impact of the war on drugs on American citizens.
The numbers already justify this policy. In recent weeks, the new Homeland Security Task Force has arrested over 3,200 gang and cartel members, seized 91 tons of narcotics, and captured over 1,000 illegal weapons. These seizures represent tens of thousands of lives saved, as every boat stopped and every shipment intercepted means fewer overdose deaths, fewer funerals, and fewer communities shattered by addiction and violence.
Critics argue that military strikes risk escalation, but the cartels have already crossed this line long ago with their murders, intimidation, and corruption. These transnational criminal enterprises now operate as shadow governments, and treating them as mere syndicates would be absurd - it would be to accept defeat.
The legal foundation for this policy is clear. In February 2025, the State Department designated several cartels as Foreign Terrorist Organizations, and a presidential determination formally declared that the US is in a non-international armed conflict with these groups. No court has challenged this policy because it aligns with both domestic and international law.
The ethical case for this approach is equally strong. The Just War tradition requires a just cause, competent authority, proportionality, and last resort - all of which have been met. This war is not about vengeance but about national defense. The Department of War, the CIA, the intelligence community, the DEA, FBI, and Coast Guard are now unified in a single mission to dismantle the cartels' capacity to kill Americans.
Every strike on a drug boat denies the enemy profit and saves lives. As Secretary Pete Hegseth said, each destroyed vessel represents roughly 25,000 Americans who will not die from the poison it carried. The cartels' economic reach rivals that of small nations, generating hundreds of billions annually - this is not commerce but organized war for profit.
A government that fails to confront such an enemy is unworthy of the people it serves. President Trump's use of military force against the cartels is justified both legally and morally. It is long overdue. The US has every right to defend its borders, its citizens, and its sovereignty against a foreign network that profits from American death.
But now, under President Trump's leadership, the US government has drawn a clear line between criminality and warfare by designating major drug cartels as foreign terrorist organizations and authorizing the use of military force against them. This approach is long overdue, given the devastating impact of the war on drugs on American citizens.
The numbers already justify this policy. In recent weeks, the new Homeland Security Task Force has arrested over 3,200 gang and cartel members, seized 91 tons of narcotics, and captured over 1,000 illegal weapons. These seizures represent tens of thousands of lives saved, as every boat stopped and every shipment intercepted means fewer overdose deaths, fewer funerals, and fewer communities shattered by addiction and violence.
Critics argue that military strikes risk escalation, but the cartels have already crossed this line long ago with their murders, intimidation, and corruption. These transnational criminal enterprises now operate as shadow governments, and treating them as mere syndicates would be absurd - it would be to accept defeat.
The legal foundation for this policy is clear. In February 2025, the State Department designated several cartels as Foreign Terrorist Organizations, and a presidential determination formally declared that the US is in a non-international armed conflict with these groups. No court has challenged this policy because it aligns with both domestic and international law.
The ethical case for this approach is equally strong. The Just War tradition requires a just cause, competent authority, proportionality, and last resort - all of which have been met. This war is not about vengeance but about national defense. The Department of War, the CIA, the intelligence community, the DEA, FBI, and Coast Guard are now unified in a single mission to dismantle the cartels' capacity to kill Americans.
Every strike on a drug boat denies the enemy profit and saves lives. As Secretary Pete Hegseth said, each destroyed vessel represents roughly 25,000 Americans who will not die from the poison it carried. The cartels' economic reach rivals that of small nations, generating hundreds of billions annually - this is not commerce but organized war for profit.
A government that fails to confront such an enemy is unworthy of the people it serves. President Trump's use of military force against the cartels is justified both legally and morally. It is long overdue. The US has every right to defend its borders, its citizens, and its sovereignty against a foreign network that profits from American death.