Judge's Home Becomes "Whole New Level" of Sanctuary for Illegal Immigrant
A disturbing scandal has emerged in New Mexico, where a Democratic judge harbored an illegal immigrant with ties to a transnational criminal gang. Cristhian Ortega-Lopez, a Venezuelan national who entered the country illegally during the Biden administration, was arrested at the home of former Dona Ana County Magistrate Judge Joel Cano and his wife Nancy Ann Cano.
According to federal authorities, Ortega-Lopez is believed to be a member of Tren de Aragua, a gang recently designated a foreign terrorist organization by the Trump administration. He pleaded guilty to illegally possessing firearms and conspiracy to destroy evidence, and his case has raised questions about the extent of sanctuary jurisdictions in the country.
The Canos' home became an unlikely sanctuary for Ortega-Lopez, with Judge Cano allegedly allowing him to live with them and facilitating communication between Ortega-Lopez and other associates. The judge even admitted to smashing a phone that contained incriminating evidence, which was later recovered by federal agents.
This scandal highlights the concerns of the Trump Department of Homeland Security (DHS), which has been critical of "sanctuary politicians" who subvert U.S. law to harbor criminal immigrants. DHS Assistant Secretary Tricia McLaughlin stated that Judge Cano's actions represent a "whole new level" of activism, taking the concept of sanctuary to an unprecedented level.
The case is also notable for its connection to a broader issue - the Trump administration's war on cartels and organized crime in Mexico. Experts predict that this effort will continue under the Biden administration, with increased focus on disrupting the networks and resources of transnational gangs like Tren de Aragua.
In this context, Judge Cano's actions have drawn criticism from all sides, as he seems to have put his own politics over his duty to uphold U.S. law. The case raises questions about the limits of sanctuary jurisdictions and the accountability of public officials who prioritize their personal beliefs over national security concerns.
A disturbing scandal has emerged in New Mexico, where a Democratic judge harbored an illegal immigrant with ties to a transnational criminal gang. Cristhian Ortega-Lopez, a Venezuelan national who entered the country illegally during the Biden administration, was arrested at the home of former Dona Ana County Magistrate Judge Joel Cano and his wife Nancy Ann Cano.
According to federal authorities, Ortega-Lopez is believed to be a member of Tren de Aragua, a gang recently designated a foreign terrorist organization by the Trump administration. He pleaded guilty to illegally possessing firearms and conspiracy to destroy evidence, and his case has raised questions about the extent of sanctuary jurisdictions in the country.
The Canos' home became an unlikely sanctuary for Ortega-Lopez, with Judge Cano allegedly allowing him to live with them and facilitating communication between Ortega-Lopez and other associates. The judge even admitted to smashing a phone that contained incriminating evidence, which was later recovered by federal agents.
This scandal highlights the concerns of the Trump Department of Homeland Security (DHS), which has been critical of "sanctuary politicians" who subvert U.S. law to harbor criminal immigrants. DHS Assistant Secretary Tricia McLaughlin stated that Judge Cano's actions represent a "whole new level" of activism, taking the concept of sanctuary to an unprecedented level.
The case is also notable for its connection to a broader issue - the Trump administration's war on cartels and organized crime in Mexico. Experts predict that this effort will continue under the Biden administration, with increased focus on disrupting the networks and resources of transnational gangs like Tren de Aragua.
In this context, Judge Cano's actions have drawn criticism from all sides, as he seems to have put his own politics over his duty to uphold U.S. law. The case raises questions about the limits of sanctuary jurisdictions and the accountability of public officials who prioritize their personal beliefs over national security concerns.