NovaNumbat2
Well-known member
Backlash to Noem and Hegseth’s Outrageous Demands Shows the Simple Power of Saying ‘No’
A powerful display of collective resistance against Donald Trump's administration has emerged in recent days, with numerous media outlets rejecting the draconian new rules proposed by Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth. The rules would have effectively restricted journalists' ability to gather information and report on classified stories, essentially turning them into government mouthpieces.
The move comes after Hegseth announced that the Pentagon would be imposing strict new guidelines for press access, requiring journalists to sign a pledge not to collect unclassified reports without permission. This would limit their ability to cover sensitive stories and potentially compromise national security.
However, instead of toeing the line, news organizations from all sides of the ideological spectrum have come together to reject these rules outright. A joint statement signed by major outlets including Fox News, ABC, CBS, NBC, CNN, The Wall Street Journal, and others has made it clear that they will not compromise on core journalistic protections.
This unified opposition is a testament to the enduring power of journalism in holding those in power accountable. By saying "no" to Hegseth's demands, these outlets are asserting their independence and commitment to reporting the truth, even if it means going against the wishes of the administration.
Noem's Tape Fails to Gain Airplay
Meanwhile, Kristi Noem has faced her own backlash for promoting a video blaming Democrats for the government shutdown at TSA checkpoints. However, instead of being seen by millions of air travelers, her message was blocked from being played due to airport policy changes.
This serves as a reminder that even those in power can be held accountable when they overstep their bounds. Noem's attempt to use government resources to spew misinformation has been exposed for what it is – an outrageous and unnecessary attempt to shift the blame.
Hegseth and Noem's Experience with "No"
For Hegseth and Noem, it seems that they are learning a valuable lesson about the power of saying "no". By trying to impose strict controls on journalists and using government resources for partisan messaging, they have inadvertently awakened a sleeping giant.
The media outlets' rejection of their rules is a clear indication that they will not be silenced or intimidated. Instead, they will continue to hold those in power accountable, even if it means pushing back against what may seem like an insurmountable force.
As the saying goes, "you can't make someone do something by telling them to". By refusing to cave under pressure, these outlets are demonstrating that a simple "no" can be just as powerful as any other word.
A powerful display of collective resistance against Donald Trump's administration has emerged in recent days, with numerous media outlets rejecting the draconian new rules proposed by Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth. The rules would have effectively restricted journalists' ability to gather information and report on classified stories, essentially turning them into government mouthpieces.
The move comes after Hegseth announced that the Pentagon would be imposing strict new guidelines for press access, requiring journalists to sign a pledge not to collect unclassified reports without permission. This would limit their ability to cover sensitive stories and potentially compromise national security.
However, instead of toeing the line, news organizations from all sides of the ideological spectrum have come together to reject these rules outright. A joint statement signed by major outlets including Fox News, ABC, CBS, NBC, CNN, The Wall Street Journal, and others has made it clear that they will not compromise on core journalistic protections.
This unified opposition is a testament to the enduring power of journalism in holding those in power accountable. By saying "no" to Hegseth's demands, these outlets are asserting their independence and commitment to reporting the truth, even if it means going against the wishes of the administration.
Noem's Tape Fails to Gain Airplay
Meanwhile, Kristi Noem has faced her own backlash for promoting a video blaming Democrats for the government shutdown at TSA checkpoints. However, instead of being seen by millions of air travelers, her message was blocked from being played due to airport policy changes.
This serves as a reminder that even those in power can be held accountable when they overstep their bounds. Noem's attempt to use government resources to spew misinformation has been exposed for what it is – an outrageous and unnecessary attempt to shift the blame.
Hegseth and Noem's Experience with "No"
For Hegseth and Noem, it seems that they are learning a valuable lesson about the power of saying "no". By trying to impose strict controls on journalists and using government resources for partisan messaging, they have inadvertently awakened a sleeping giant.
The media outlets' rejection of their rules is a clear indication that they will not be silenced or intimidated. Instead, they will continue to hold those in power accountable, even if it means pushing back against what may seem like an insurmountable force.
As the saying goes, "you can't make someone do something by telling them to". By refusing to cave under pressure, these outlets are demonstrating that a simple "no" can be just as powerful as any other word.
. but at the same time, can't they see how this is gonna make them look like, like super extreme and kinda unfair? i mean, news orgs are supposed to be independent, not just mouthpieces for whoever's in power 
. don't get me wrong, its awesome that they're pushing back against hegseth's rules, but maybe there's a way to find common ground without sacrificing journalistic integrity?
. Like, no thanks, we're not gonna be government mouthpieces. And now he's going around saying 'oh, you didn't comply' like it's some big deal 
. Meanwhile, Noem is over here promoting her own brand of misinformation and expecting us to play along 
. I mean, it's about time they pushed back against the Pentagon's tryin' to clip their wings, right? But at the same time, can we really say these outlets are doin' what's best for the country or just protectin' their own interests?