US investigators have revealed that Boeing was aware of a structural flaw in the part of the aircraft responsible for last month's UPS plane crash, which claimed the lives of 15 people. The MD-11F freighter crashed after one of its engines separated from the wing during takeoff, sending it careening into an industrial area.
According to the US National Transportation Safety Board (NTSB), cracks were found in the engine mounting assembly on this particular plane, but Boeing had identified similar problems on other aircraft 15 years ago. The company had previously found failures of a similar part on four occasions affecting three different planes.
Boeing had taken steps to address the issue, recommending that operators include a general visual inspection every five years and draw attention to a revised bearing assembly that could be fitted. However, it is unclear why Boeing did not take more decisive action to prevent this specific problem from occurring.
Critics of Boeing's internal processes say that the company's prioritization of cost-cutting measures over safety has led to repeated lapses in quality control. The 737 Max crisis, which involved flawed software and multiple accidents resulting in 346 deaths, highlighted these concerns.
The NTSB has expressed disappointment at Boeing's response to previous warnings about this particular part, saying that the issue was not adequately addressed. "It's extraordinary that Boeing concluded that a failure of this part would not have safety consequences," said Tim Atkinson, a former air accident investigator and current aviation safety consultant.
Boeing has since issued a statement expressing its condolences to those affected and promising to continue supporting the NTSB's investigation. However, critics argue that more needs to be done to prevent similar tragedies in the future.
The full extent of Boeing's knowledge about this specific flaw will become clear once the NTSB releases its final report on the accident.
According to the US National Transportation Safety Board (NTSB), cracks were found in the engine mounting assembly on this particular plane, but Boeing had identified similar problems on other aircraft 15 years ago. The company had previously found failures of a similar part on four occasions affecting three different planes.
Boeing had taken steps to address the issue, recommending that operators include a general visual inspection every five years and draw attention to a revised bearing assembly that could be fitted. However, it is unclear why Boeing did not take more decisive action to prevent this specific problem from occurring.
Critics of Boeing's internal processes say that the company's prioritization of cost-cutting measures over safety has led to repeated lapses in quality control. The 737 Max crisis, which involved flawed software and multiple accidents resulting in 346 deaths, highlighted these concerns.
The NTSB has expressed disappointment at Boeing's response to previous warnings about this particular part, saying that the issue was not adequately addressed. "It's extraordinary that Boeing concluded that a failure of this part would not have safety consequences," said Tim Atkinson, a former air accident investigator and current aviation safety consultant.
Boeing has since issued a statement expressing its condolences to those affected and promising to continue supporting the NTSB's investigation. However, critics argue that more needs to be done to prevent similar tragedies in the future.
The full extent of Boeing's knowledge about this specific flaw will become clear once the NTSB releases its final report on the accident.