Corporate giants speak out, but is anyone listening?
It's been years since major US CEOs joined forces to push for gun control legislation. In 2019 and again this past summer, nearly 150 companies with a combined market value of over $3 trillion called for stricter regulations on firearms. But when the latest mass school shooting in Nashville occurred recently, there was an eerie silence from corporate America.
The nation has come to rely on large corporations as vocal advocates on various issues. However, Yale professor Jeffrey Sonnenfeld, who has direct lines to top executives, believes that CEOs are feeling frustrated and disenfranchised. Their previous efforts have not led to significant changes in gun control legislation, leaving them wondering what more they can do.
Sonnenfeld notes that while CEOs may be vocal on issues like voting rights, immigration reform, and sustainability, their silence on gun control is particularly striking. "We're waiting for everybody else to join us," he says. "The social change that happened in the 1960s wasn't being led primarily by CEOs. Social changes really happened when we saw interfaith activity, campuses alive and aroused. Where's all the student activism?"
Sonnenfeld attributes the growing reliance on corporate America as a solution to issues like gun control to the fact that CEOs have taken a strong stance but are not seeing the desired results. "Social capital is as valuable as financial capital," he explains. "CEOs want there to be public trust, but they need the rest of civil society to join them."
In contrast, some believe that CEOs do hold significant influence in terms of donating to politicians, but recent data suggests otherwise. Since the 2020 elections, campaign contributions from big business have decreased significantly. Similarly, following the January 6 attack on the US Capitol, many companies have either halted their political giving or donated minimal amounts.
Tesla's latest financial reports provide an interesting counterpoint to this narrative. The company reported a modest 4% rise in sales in the first quarter compared to last year, despite price cuts and Elon Musk's claims of strong demand for its lower-priced vehicles. However, Tesla has still produced more vehicles than it has delivered to customers, including a significant surplus over the past 12 months.
It seems that while some CEOs may be vocal on certain issues, their influence is not as far-reaching as previously thought. As Sonnenfeld puts it, "We're waiting for everybody else to join us."
It's been years since major US CEOs joined forces to push for gun control legislation. In 2019 and again this past summer, nearly 150 companies with a combined market value of over $3 trillion called for stricter regulations on firearms. But when the latest mass school shooting in Nashville occurred recently, there was an eerie silence from corporate America.
The nation has come to rely on large corporations as vocal advocates on various issues. However, Yale professor Jeffrey Sonnenfeld, who has direct lines to top executives, believes that CEOs are feeling frustrated and disenfranchised. Their previous efforts have not led to significant changes in gun control legislation, leaving them wondering what more they can do.
Sonnenfeld notes that while CEOs may be vocal on issues like voting rights, immigration reform, and sustainability, their silence on gun control is particularly striking. "We're waiting for everybody else to join us," he says. "The social change that happened in the 1960s wasn't being led primarily by CEOs. Social changes really happened when we saw interfaith activity, campuses alive and aroused. Where's all the student activism?"
Sonnenfeld attributes the growing reliance on corporate America as a solution to issues like gun control to the fact that CEOs have taken a strong stance but are not seeing the desired results. "Social capital is as valuable as financial capital," he explains. "CEOs want there to be public trust, but they need the rest of civil society to join them."
In contrast, some believe that CEOs do hold significant influence in terms of donating to politicians, but recent data suggests otherwise. Since the 2020 elections, campaign contributions from big business have decreased significantly. Similarly, following the January 6 attack on the US Capitol, many companies have either halted their political giving or donated minimal amounts.
Tesla's latest financial reports provide an interesting counterpoint to this narrative. The company reported a modest 4% rise in sales in the first quarter compared to last year, despite price cuts and Elon Musk's claims of strong demand for its lower-priced vehicles. However, Tesla has still produced more vehicles than it has delivered to customers, including a significant surplus over the past 12 months.
It seems that while some CEOs may be vocal on certain issues, their influence is not as far-reaching as previously thought. As Sonnenfeld puts it, "We're waiting for everybody else to join us."