Iran is staring into the abyss, and its survival hinges on making drastic changes. The recent protests have subsided, with tens of thousands arrested and business assets seized, but the underlying grievances persist. With a battered economy, weakened regional allies, and the looming threat of US attack, Iran finds itself at a crossroads.
"This is not a stable status quo – it's just not tenable," says Ali Vaez, director of the Iran Project at the International Crisis Group. "I am not predicting that the system will hit rock bottom tomorrow, but it's in a spiral and from this point on, it can only go down if it refuses to change."
The protests erupted in late December, sparked by a currency collapse that morphed into a nationwide uprising calling for the overthrow of the Islamic republic. The authorities' response was violent, with 3,117 people killed, including 2,427 civilians and security forces. However, human rights activists claim the figure is much higher, with over 5,000 deaths.
Iran's economic crisis has deepened the situation. Decades of international sanctions, mismanagement, and corruption have led to a rial value that nose-dived, oil revenues shrunk, and inflation peaked at 42 percent last year. The country struggles with electricity outages and chronic water shortages, making life increasingly difficult for citizens.
To get sanctions relief, Iran needs to negotiate a deal with the Trump administration, but this would require significant concessions on its core foreign policy pillars – nuclear program, ballistic missiles, and supporting regional allies. These elements have been crucial components of Iran's "forward defence" strategy, aimed at preventing fighting from reaching Iranian territory.
The stakes are high, with Trump threatening to dismantle Iran's nuclear infrastructure entirely, an option the country has ruled out. Concerning support for non-state actors in the region, Iran is reconfiguring its network following the war last June with Israel, which degraded Hezbollah's arsenal and leadership.
Talks between Iran and the US are ongoing, but it remains unclear whether major concessions will be made. Trump hinted at a renewed bombing campaign if Iran resumes enrichment, putting pressure on Supreme Leader Ali Khamenei to make changes.
The question now is whether change is inevitable. The social contract between the Iranian people and the system has withered over the decades, and the provision of security is increasingly under question. A transformation has already started, with the political system moving from a clerical into a military leadership as the Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps grows in power.
According to experts, after Khamenei's departure or removal, the Islamic Republic may not survive in its current form. The future holds uncertainty, but one thing is clear: Iran must make drastic changes to ensure its survival, and that change is inevitable.
"This is not a stable status quo – it's just not tenable," says Ali Vaez, director of the Iran Project at the International Crisis Group. "I am not predicting that the system will hit rock bottom tomorrow, but it's in a spiral and from this point on, it can only go down if it refuses to change."
The protests erupted in late December, sparked by a currency collapse that morphed into a nationwide uprising calling for the overthrow of the Islamic republic. The authorities' response was violent, with 3,117 people killed, including 2,427 civilians and security forces. However, human rights activists claim the figure is much higher, with over 5,000 deaths.
Iran's economic crisis has deepened the situation. Decades of international sanctions, mismanagement, and corruption have led to a rial value that nose-dived, oil revenues shrunk, and inflation peaked at 42 percent last year. The country struggles with electricity outages and chronic water shortages, making life increasingly difficult for citizens.
To get sanctions relief, Iran needs to negotiate a deal with the Trump administration, but this would require significant concessions on its core foreign policy pillars – nuclear program, ballistic missiles, and supporting regional allies. These elements have been crucial components of Iran's "forward defence" strategy, aimed at preventing fighting from reaching Iranian territory.
The stakes are high, with Trump threatening to dismantle Iran's nuclear infrastructure entirely, an option the country has ruled out. Concerning support for non-state actors in the region, Iran is reconfiguring its network following the war last June with Israel, which degraded Hezbollah's arsenal and leadership.
Talks between Iran and the US are ongoing, but it remains unclear whether major concessions will be made. Trump hinted at a renewed bombing campaign if Iran resumes enrichment, putting pressure on Supreme Leader Ali Khamenei to make changes.
The question now is whether change is inevitable. The social contract between the Iranian people and the system has withered over the decades, and the provision of security is increasingly under question. A transformation has already started, with the political system moving from a clerical into a military leadership as the Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps grows in power.
According to experts, after Khamenei's departure or removal, the Islamic Republic may not survive in its current form. The future holds uncertainty, but one thing is clear: Iran must make drastic changes to ensure its survival, and that change is inevitable.