Former Libor Trader Seeks $400m from UBS for Alleged Wrongful Conviction and Malicious Prosecution
The first banker to be jailed over the infamous Libor rate-fixing scandal, Tom Hayes, has filed a lawsuit against his former employer UBS in a US court seeking $400m (Β£300m) in compensation. The claim, which was publicly filed on Monday, accuses UBS of orchestrating a smear campaign against Hayes in order to protect its senior executives and minimize regulatory fines.
Hayes spent five and a half years in prison for allegedly being the ringleader of a massive conspiracy to manipulate the London Interbank Offered Rate (Libor) between 2006 and 2010. However, he has consistently maintained his innocence and argued that regulators unfairly targeted him as part of an "industry-wide" practice.
The wider Libor scandal led to billions of dollars in fines for dozens of financial institutions, but Hayes believes he was unfairly scapegoated by UBS to avoid accountability from senior executives and minimize penalties. He claims that the bank conducted a flawed investigation and misled US authorities in order to pin the blame on him.
This is not the first time Hayes has sought justice against UBS. In July, the UK Supreme Court overturned his decade-old conviction due to errors in the original trial, but stopped short of exonerating him entirely. The court ruled that while there was evidence to support his guilt, the jury was not properly directed, rendering the convictions "unsafe and unsound."
Hayes's lawsuit against UBS seeks damages for what he claims was malicious prosecution and a destruction of his reputation and career. He also alleges that UBS's actions led to personal tragedy, including the loss of his liberty, marriage, and son's childhood.
The case is set to be heard by a jury, who will scrutinize UBS's conduct in relation to the alleged wrongful conviction and malicious prosecution.
The first banker to be jailed over the infamous Libor rate-fixing scandal, Tom Hayes, has filed a lawsuit against his former employer UBS in a US court seeking $400m (Β£300m) in compensation. The claim, which was publicly filed on Monday, accuses UBS of orchestrating a smear campaign against Hayes in order to protect its senior executives and minimize regulatory fines.
Hayes spent five and a half years in prison for allegedly being the ringleader of a massive conspiracy to manipulate the London Interbank Offered Rate (Libor) between 2006 and 2010. However, he has consistently maintained his innocence and argued that regulators unfairly targeted him as part of an "industry-wide" practice.
The wider Libor scandal led to billions of dollars in fines for dozens of financial institutions, but Hayes believes he was unfairly scapegoated by UBS to avoid accountability from senior executives and minimize penalties. He claims that the bank conducted a flawed investigation and misled US authorities in order to pin the blame on him.
This is not the first time Hayes has sought justice against UBS. In July, the UK Supreme Court overturned his decade-old conviction due to errors in the original trial, but stopped short of exonerating him entirely. The court ruled that while there was evidence to support his guilt, the jury was not properly directed, rendering the convictions "unsafe and unsound."
Hayes's lawsuit against UBS seeks damages for what he claims was malicious prosecution and a destruction of his reputation and career. He also alleges that UBS's actions led to personal tragedy, including the loss of his liberty, marriage, and son's childhood.
The case is set to be heard by a jury, who will scrutinize UBS's conduct in relation to the alleged wrongful conviction and malicious prosecution.