Germany's Mainstream Parties Are Embracing Far-Right Agenda, Study Finds
A recent study published in the European Journal of Political Research has revealed a worrying trend in Germany: mainstream parties are increasingly allowing the far-right to set the agenda. Researchers analyzed over 520,000 articles from six major German newspapers spanning more than two decades and found that as the far right shifted its focus to issues like integration and migration, mainstream parties began to respond, boosting the spread of these ideas and legitimizing them in the eyes of voters.
The study's findings suggest that by responding to the far-right agenda, mainstream parties are inadvertently giving the far-right more attention and traction. This phenomenon has been dubbed "agenda setting" and has significant implications for democracy. According to Teresa VΓΆlker, a political sociologist at Berlin Social Science Center, "Political communication by mainstream parties plays a central role in the electoral success of the far right." The study's researchers argue that this effect is not limited to Germany but can be observed across Europe.
The data collected by the researchers showed that as the far-right became more prominent, mainstream parties began to adapt their language and policies to match. This normalization of far-right ideas has been accompanied by a gradual increase in their influence over time. The study found that opposition parties were just as susceptible to the far-right agenda setting as those in government.
The study's authors warn that this phenomenon has severe consequences for democracy, particularly when mainstream parties adopt the language and tone of the far-right without critically examining its implications. As Daniel Saldivia Gonzatti, a co-author of the study, put it, "It's like a dance. If the conductor is far-right and you're reacting to it, you cannot decide which music should be playing."
The study's findings come at a critical time in German politics, where the mainstream parties have been accused of adopting the language and policies of the far-right on issues like migration and integration. The researchers' call for mainstream parties to carve out their own discourses and not trail behind the far-right is timely and urgent. By doing so, they can reclaim the agenda and promote a more inclusive and democratic discourse.
The study's implications extend beyond Germany, suggesting that similar trends may be observed across Europe. However, the Nordic countries appear to have taken steps to mitigate this effect, with the far-right influence moving into a "second stage" of policy issues that go beyond cultural concerns.
A recent study published in the European Journal of Political Research has revealed a worrying trend in Germany: mainstream parties are increasingly allowing the far-right to set the agenda. Researchers analyzed over 520,000 articles from six major German newspapers spanning more than two decades and found that as the far right shifted its focus to issues like integration and migration, mainstream parties began to respond, boosting the spread of these ideas and legitimizing them in the eyes of voters.
The study's findings suggest that by responding to the far-right agenda, mainstream parties are inadvertently giving the far-right more attention and traction. This phenomenon has been dubbed "agenda setting" and has significant implications for democracy. According to Teresa VΓΆlker, a political sociologist at Berlin Social Science Center, "Political communication by mainstream parties plays a central role in the electoral success of the far right." The study's researchers argue that this effect is not limited to Germany but can be observed across Europe.
The data collected by the researchers showed that as the far-right became more prominent, mainstream parties began to adapt their language and policies to match. This normalization of far-right ideas has been accompanied by a gradual increase in their influence over time. The study found that opposition parties were just as susceptible to the far-right agenda setting as those in government.
The study's authors warn that this phenomenon has severe consequences for democracy, particularly when mainstream parties adopt the language and tone of the far-right without critically examining its implications. As Daniel Saldivia Gonzatti, a co-author of the study, put it, "It's like a dance. If the conductor is far-right and you're reacting to it, you cannot decide which music should be playing."
The study's findings come at a critical time in German politics, where the mainstream parties have been accused of adopting the language and policies of the far-right on issues like migration and integration. The researchers' call for mainstream parties to carve out their own discourses and not trail behind the far-right is timely and urgent. By doing so, they can reclaim the agenda and promote a more inclusive and democratic discourse.
The study's implications extend beyond Germany, suggesting that similar trends may be observed across Europe. However, the Nordic countries appear to have taken steps to mitigate this effect, with the far-right influence moving into a "second stage" of policy issues that go beyond cultural concerns.