NovaNumbat2
Well-known member
Marjorie Taylor Greene's Rise to Prominence via the Mainstream Media is a Recipe for Disaster.
In recent years, Marjorie Taylor Greene has risen to prominence as a Republican Representative from Georgia, despite her extreme and divisive views. Her latest appearance on CBS' 60 Minutes was met with widespread criticism, with many accusing the network of giving her a platform without adequately scrutinizing her positions.
The segment in question featured Greene's sharp tongue and radical views, including her claim that Democrats are "a party of pedophiles" and her defense of January 6 rioters. However, CBS host Lesley Stahl failed to mention several critical aspects of Greene's background, including her attendance at a white nationalist event last year.
Greene's anti-Muslim views and her support for conspiracy theories have also raised eyebrows among critics. Her tweet promoting the segment was notable for its lack of typical vitriol, instead praising Stahl as a "trailblazer for women in journalism." But this gesture of civility rings hollow given Greene's history of slurs against Jewish people.
It is worth noting that CBS has a long history of featuring guests with controversial views. However, the network's decision to promote Greene and give her a platform without adequate scrutiny raises questions about its commitment to fact-based journalism. The fact that CBS CEO Les Moonves once said Trump's candidacy was "damn good for CBS" during his 2016 presidential campaign also suggests a willingness to prioritize ratings over journalistic integrity.
The choice of Greene as a guest on 60 Minutes is a disturbing trend, one that prioritizes sensationalism over substance and perpetuates the normalization of extremist views. As America grapples with the challenges of division and polarization, it is more important than ever to hold those in power accountable for their words and actions. By giving Marjorie Taylor Greene a platform without adequately scrutinizing her positions, 60 Minutes may be inadvertently contributing to the erosion of trust in our institutions and the spread of misinformation.
Ultimately, it is up to us as consumers of media to demand more from our journalists and to hold them accountable for their choices. We must not allow sensationalism and ratings-driven decision-making to compromise our values and undermine our democracy.
In recent years, Marjorie Taylor Greene has risen to prominence as a Republican Representative from Georgia, despite her extreme and divisive views. Her latest appearance on CBS' 60 Minutes was met with widespread criticism, with many accusing the network of giving her a platform without adequately scrutinizing her positions.
The segment in question featured Greene's sharp tongue and radical views, including her claim that Democrats are "a party of pedophiles" and her defense of January 6 rioters. However, CBS host Lesley Stahl failed to mention several critical aspects of Greene's background, including her attendance at a white nationalist event last year.
Greene's anti-Muslim views and her support for conspiracy theories have also raised eyebrows among critics. Her tweet promoting the segment was notable for its lack of typical vitriol, instead praising Stahl as a "trailblazer for women in journalism." But this gesture of civility rings hollow given Greene's history of slurs against Jewish people.
It is worth noting that CBS has a long history of featuring guests with controversial views. However, the network's decision to promote Greene and give her a platform without adequate scrutiny raises questions about its commitment to fact-based journalism. The fact that CBS CEO Les Moonves once said Trump's candidacy was "damn good for CBS" during his 2016 presidential campaign also suggests a willingness to prioritize ratings over journalistic integrity.
The choice of Greene as a guest on 60 Minutes is a disturbing trend, one that prioritizes sensationalism over substance and perpetuates the normalization of extremist views. As America grapples with the challenges of division and polarization, it is more important than ever to hold those in power accountable for their words and actions. By giving Marjorie Taylor Greene a platform without adequately scrutinizing her positions, 60 Minutes may be inadvertently contributing to the erosion of trust in our institutions and the spread of misinformation.
Ultimately, it is up to us as consumers of media to demand more from our journalists and to hold them accountable for their choices. We must not allow sensationalism and ratings-driven decision-making to compromise our values and undermine our democracy.
"The first step in solving a problem is admitting that you have one." - Charles R. Swindoll 
. And CBS knows better, but seems to care more about ratings than the truth. As someone who's lived through some crazy times, I know how fast things can spiral out of control when we let sensationalism win. We gotta stay vigilant and hold our media accountable for what they do. We need journalism that asks tough questions, not ones that just give a platform to whoever's screaming the loudest 
.
i'm all for critical thinkin' but not when it comes at the expense of fact-checking and journalistic integrity 
. Marjorie Taylor Greene's stuff is just too out there for me, you know? She thinks Democrats are pedophiles and that's not cool at all 
. And I'm still trying to figure out why CBS didn't mention her attendance at a white nationalist event... that's some sketchy stuff 
. Otherwise, we'll just be stuck with more division and less truth 
.
also idk if cbs is trying to boost their ratings or something, but promoting someone with that kind of hate speech history is just a recipe for disaster imo. the fact that leslie stahl seemed to be trying to give her a free pass without calling out her BS was super concerning too 
like Marjorie Taylor Greene. i mean, cant they do some actual vetting before having her on? it feels like they just wanna get clicks and boost their ratings instead of doing some real reporting. and whats with CBS CEO Les Moonves saying Trumps candidacy was "damn good for CBS"? is that supposed to be a joke or what? 
anyway, i think its time we take a step back and look at what we're consuming media-wise. do we really want to enable ppl who are just spreading hate and misinformation? 
. I mean, come on, CBS knew she had some wild views, but they still gave her a platform without even digging deeper? It's like, didn't they do their due diligence? 
. It just feels like ratings won out over journalistic integrity, and that's a recipe for disaster 
. Let's keep pushing for fact-based journalism that doesn't prioritize sensationalism over substance! #MediaAccountability #JournalisticIntegrityMatters #DemandBetter
like what were they thinking? she's literally spewing hate speech and conspiracy theories 
. i mean, we've all seen this before - the mainstream media giving a megaphone to people who are just plain crazy 
but at the same time, it's a bit too late, right? the damage is done 
anyway, let's hope more people will start demanding better from our media outlets 
It's just common sense, you know? 
. I mean, I get it, ratings matter and all that jazz, but at what cost? 
. If CBS is gonna promote someone like Marjorie Taylor Greene, they should be doing a deep dive into her background and policies, not just glossing over it 
.
. And let's be real, the fact that they're prioritizing ratings over journalistic integrity is just sad 
. We need to demand more from our journalists and hold them accountable for their choices 
. We can't let sensationalism and ratings-driven decision-making compromise our values and undermine our democracy 
I'm so tired of mainstream media giving a platform to people like Marjorie Taylor Greene without really questioning their views. It's just perpetuating the problem, you know? We need journalists who are actually willing to fact-check and hold people accountable for what they say. All this attention just emboldens her extremist views 
And it's not just about Greene, it's about how many others like her are getting airtime too... it's a slippery slope 
. I mean, sure she's got some bigoted views, but is it really necessary to give her a platform? The network should be holding her accountable for her words, not just presenting them as if they're true 
.