Trump's aggressive outburst against a judge and his family has raised eyebrows, with some speculating that it was a calculated move to sway public opinion in his favor. According to Maggie Haberman, the reasoning behind Trump's attacks lies in his understanding of how the justice system works.
"He knows what he's doing," Haberman said. "He wants you to believe that this is a witch hunt, that these charges are fake and that this judge is just trying to harass him." By painting the situation as a partisan attack on his family and character, Trump aims to shift the narrative away from the substance of the allegations against him.
Haberman also pointed out that Trump's strategy involves exploiting emotions rather than facts. "He knows that if he can create enough outrage, enough anger and resentment, people will be less likely to listen to the evidence," she said. By targeting a judge and his family, Trump is trying to tap into those emotions and rally support for himself.
The attack on the judge was particularly notable, as it showed Trump's willingness to use personal attacks to undermine the legitimacy of the judicial system. Haberman believes that this move was intended to undermine faith in the courts and create confusion among jurors.
In her analysis, Haberman suggests that Trump is using a classic tactic in politics: using controversy and outrage to energize his base. "He knows that if he can get people riled up, they'll be more likely to support him," she said.
Ultimately, Haberman's explanation highlights the cunning nature of Trump's strategy, as well as the stakes involved in the upcoming trial. By leveraging emotions and perceptions, Trump is trying to gain an advantage over his accusers, even if it means resorting to personal attacks and conspiracy theories.
The question remains whether this approach will pay off for Trump, or if it will ultimately backfire by alienating key voters who value fairness and impartiality in the justice system.
"He knows what he's doing," Haberman said. "He wants you to believe that this is a witch hunt, that these charges are fake and that this judge is just trying to harass him." By painting the situation as a partisan attack on his family and character, Trump aims to shift the narrative away from the substance of the allegations against him.
Haberman also pointed out that Trump's strategy involves exploiting emotions rather than facts. "He knows that if he can create enough outrage, enough anger and resentment, people will be less likely to listen to the evidence," she said. By targeting a judge and his family, Trump is trying to tap into those emotions and rally support for himself.
The attack on the judge was particularly notable, as it showed Trump's willingness to use personal attacks to undermine the legitimacy of the judicial system. Haberman believes that this move was intended to undermine faith in the courts and create confusion among jurors.
In her analysis, Haberman suggests that Trump is using a classic tactic in politics: using controversy and outrage to energize his base. "He knows that if he can get people riled up, they'll be more likely to support him," she said.
Ultimately, Haberman's explanation highlights the cunning nature of Trump's strategy, as well as the stakes involved in the upcoming trial. By leveraging emotions and perceptions, Trump is trying to gain an advantage over his accusers, even if it means resorting to personal attacks and conspiracy theories.
The question remains whether this approach will pay off for Trump, or if it will ultimately backfire by alienating key voters who value fairness and impartiality in the justice system.
he's using his family as human shields to deflect the heat on himself... like, what's next? attacking a reporter's kid for asking him a question lol? 
this whole thing just reeks of desperation, trying to sway public opinion by exploiting emotions over facts. newsflash: it ain't gonna work 
We're always learning about the justice system in school, and this just goes to show that it's not all about winning at all costs.
. But, honestly, it's kinda sad. It's like, we're supposed to be a democratic country where everyone gets treated fairly, you know? 
Not like that.
. I just hope Trump doesn't try to manipulate people into believing he's being bullied or something 
i was binge watching last night and i couldn't believe how close the plot got to reality, lol what's more real than a guilty drama 
Instead he tries to spin it into some wild conspiracy theory that's so believable only his die-hard fans will buy it.
. He's exploiting emotions over facts which is super suspect 
. If people start to lose faith in the courts, it's gonna be a real mess 
. And honestly, I don't think it'll even work for him in the long run 
. People who care about fairness and impartiality aren't gonna be won over by tantrums and personal attacks 
.
.
The way Trump is going about his defense strategy is super concerning. I mean, attacking a judge and his family like that? It's just not right. He knows he's pushing people's emotions rather than focusing on facts, which is actually really smart (or manipulative?) of him.