In a speech at his Mar-a-Lago resort, Donald Trump unleashed scathing attacks on the judge presiding over his upcoming trial and his own family members. According to CNN's Maggie Haberman, who has been following the story closely, Trump's outburst was not just a tantrum, but rather a calculated attempt to sway public opinion in his favor.
Haberman believes that Trump realized he needed to change the narrative about his impending trial, which had become increasingly negative for him. By targeting the judge and his family, he hoped to portray himself as the victim of a deep-seated conspiracy against him.
The attacks on the judge were particularly noteworthy, with Trump calling him "a terrible" and "disgusting". Haberman suggests that this was not just a personal attack, but also a veiled attempt to undermine the credibility of the judicial system itself. By delegitimizing the judge, Trump aimed to create the perception that the entire trial process is rigged against him.
As for his family members, Trump's attacks on them appear to be part of a broader strategy to demonize anyone who has stood in his way over the years. By portraying himself as a victim and painting those around him as enemies, he hopes to rally his base of supporters and create a sense of collective grievance against the "deep state".
Haberman notes that this tactic is reminiscent of Trump's behavior during the 2016 presidential campaign, when he repeatedly attacked Hillary Clinton, the Democratic nominee. By doing so, Trump was able to tap into a deep-seated desire among many Americans to feel angry and resentful towards their opponents.
However, Haberman also warns that this approach may ultimately backfire for Trump. As she puts it, "When you attack innocent people, you can create a narrative that says 'this guy is crazy', and that's not going to be effective in building support". Ultimately, Haberman believes that Trump's attempts to sway public opinion through personal attacks will only serve to further polarize the country and undermine his own credibility.
Haberman believes that Trump realized he needed to change the narrative about his impending trial, which had become increasingly negative for him. By targeting the judge and his family, he hoped to portray himself as the victim of a deep-seated conspiracy against him.
The attacks on the judge were particularly noteworthy, with Trump calling him "a terrible" and "disgusting". Haberman suggests that this was not just a personal attack, but also a veiled attempt to undermine the credibility of the judicial system itself. By delegitimizing the judge, Trump aimed to create the perception that the entire trial process is rigged against him.
As for his family members, Trump's attacks on them appear to be part of a broader strategy to demonize anyone who has stood in his way over the years. By portraying himself as a victim and painting those around him as enemies, he hopes to rally his base of supporters and create a sense of collective grievance against the "deep state".
Haberman notes that this tactic is reminiscent of Trump's behavior during the 2016 presidential campaign, when he repeatedly attacked Hillary Clinton, the Democratic nominee. By doing so, Trump was able to tap into a deep-seated desire among many Americans to feel angry and resentful towards their opponents.
However, Haberman also warns that this approach may ultimately backfire for Trump. As she puts it, "When you attack innocent people, you can create a narrative that says 'this guy is crazy', and that's not going to be effective in building support". Ultimately, Haberman believes that Trump's attempts to sway public opinion through personal attacks will only serve to further polarize the country and undermine his own credibility.