BinaryBard
Well-known member
Performers in the film and TV industry have been subjected to invasive body scanning without their consent, sparking concerns over the role of artificial intelligence (AI) in the production process.
These scans often take place in a booth filled with cameras that capture every angle of the performer's likeness, raising questions about data ownership and usage rights. Olivia Williams, an actress who has appeared in various productions including "The Sixth Sense" and "Dune: Prophecy," described being scanned multiple times during filming as "a bit of a nightmare."
Industry experts say that performers are often hesitant to speak out against the practice due to fear of losing their jobs or damage to their professional reputation. However, as AI doubles for performers become increasingly popular, there is growing urgency to clarify performers' rights and ensure transparency around data harvesting.
The development of AI-generated images has also raised concerns over authenticity and ownership. A "Tilly Norwood" character, created by an AI algorithm, has sparked debate over the boundaries between human performance and artificial simulation.
To address these issues, data rights lawyer Alex Lawrence-Archer suggests that performers need to negotiate better contracts that reflect a fair agreement between actors, studios, and AI developers. He warns against reducing the issue solely to extra compensation for performers, arguing that it risks creating a world where actors become "data gig workers" rather than valued creative performers.
As the industry navigates this new landscape, there is a growing need for safeguards to protect performers' rights and control over their data. Theo Morton, a professional stunt performer, emphasizes the importance of creating contractual agreements that prevent the erosion of human creativity in the face of AI-driven production methods.
Ultimately, it remains unclear where exactly the data used to train AI models originates, with many developers and studios keeping this information closely guarded. However, experts agree that transparency is essential for ensuring the integrity of performers' rights and preventing a potential loss of control over their craft.
These scans often take place in a booth filled with cameras that capture every angle of the performer's likeness, raising questions about data ownership and usage rights. Olivia Williams, an actress who has appeared in various productions including "The Sixth Sense" and "Dune: Prophecy," described being scanned multiple times during filming as "a bit of a nightmare."
Industry experts say that performers are often hesitant to speak out against the practice due to fear of losing their jobs or damage to their professional reputation. However, as AI doubles for performers become increasingly popular, there is growing urgency to clarify performers' rights and ensure transparency around data harvesting.
The development of AI-generated images has also raised concerns over authenticity and ownership. A "Tilly Norwood" character, created by an AI algorithm, has sparked debate over the boundaries between human performance and artificial simulation.
To address these issues, data rights lawyer Alex Lawrence-Archer suggests that performers need to negotiate better contracts that reflect a fair agreement between actors, studios, and AI developers. He warns against reducing the issue solely to extra compensation for performers, arguing that it risks creating a world where actors become "data gig workers" rather than valued creative performers.
As the industry navigates this new landscape, there is a growing need for safeguards to protect performers' rights and control over their data. Theo Morton, a professional stunt performer, emphasizes the importance of creating contractual agreements that prevent the erosion of human creativity in the face of AI-driven production methods.
Ultimately, it remains unclear where exactly the data used to train AI models originates, with many developers and studios keeping this information closely guarded. However, experts agree that transparency is essential for ensuring the integrity of performers' rights and preventing a potential loss of control over their craft.
. Like, AI is supposed to be all about making our lives easier, but when it comes to performers' bodies, it's like they're just being used as a giant data experiment 
. I mean, who gives consent for these invasive scans? And what even is the point of capturing every angle of someone's likeness? Are we really that obsessed with perfection?
. It's like, where does human creativity even fit in anymore? Is a "Tilly Norwood" character created by an algorithm just as valid as, say, Meryl Streep's performance in The Post?
. We need some real change here, not just a pat on the back or a few extra bucks 
. It's time for performers to take control of their own data and negotiate better contracts that respect their humanity 
. Transparency is key, folks!
! Can't they just get consent from the actors first? It's not like it's going to be that hard or expensive. And what's up with the AI-generated images? I mean, I know it's cool and all, but can we please just keep human performers' work authentic for once? 
This whole data ownership thing is getting out of hand 
It's like, studios and devs are hiding something. Transparency is key here! 
. And what's with this Tilly Norwood character, is it just a test run for robots taking over our industry? 
I'm all for the artists getting paid but not at the cost of their humanity, we need some kind of balance here. And can we please get some answers about where that data even comes from? It's like they're hiding something 
. We need to get our acts together and make sure these performers are protected, it's time for some real change 
. Like, I get it, tech has to advance, but can't we just have some basic human decency here? 
These invasive body scans are straight up creepy and performers need to stand up for themselves. It's not like they're gonna lose their jobs or anything (although that does sound like a nightmare 
). But seriously, who owns the rights to this data? The studios? The AI devs? 
. Performers deserve to be respected as creators, not just their likenesses used for profit 
. And what about these AI-generated images? Where do they fit in? Is it even art anymore? 
