Historic Preservation Group Urges Trump Admin to Pause Demolition of White House East Wing Ballroom
A nonprofit organization chartered by Congress has sent a letter to several government agencies, urging them to pause the demolition of the East Wing of the White House until plans for President Trump's proposed ballroom are completed.
The National Trust for Historic Preservation, which has no statutory authority to compel the administration to halt construction, is concerned about the size of the ballroom annex and its impact on the White House itself. According to the group, the proposal would "overwhelm the White House" with a massive 90,000-square-foot addition.
The Society of Architectural Historians and the American Institute of Architects have also raised similar concerns about the ballroom's size and design, citing the need for it to harmonize with the existing architectural proportions of the White House. However, these groups do not have statutory authority to influence the design or construction of the project.
Despite the concerns from these organizations, the White House has defended its plans for the new ballroom, calling them "visionary" and stating that nearly every president who has lived in the White House has made modernizations and renovations. The administration claims that the proposed addition will provide a larger event space, citing the desire of past presidents to have more room for hosting events.
However, critics argue that the proposal is an attempt to further amplify President Trump's wealth and influence by adding a privately funded ballroom to the White House. The National Trust for Historic Preservation has called on the administration to pause demolition until plans are completed and subjected to public review processes.
				
			A nonprofit organization chartered by Congress has sent a letter to several government agencies, urging them to pause the demolition of the East Wing of the White House until plans for President Trump's proposed ballroom are completed.
The National Trust for Historic Preservation, which has no statutory authority to compel the administration to halt construction, is concerned about the size of the ballroom annex and its impact on the White House itself. According to the group, the proposal would "overwhelm the White House" with a massive 90,000-square-foot addition.
The Society of Architectural Historians and the American Institute of Architects have also raised similar concerns about the ballroom's size and design, citing the need for it to harmonize with the existing architectural proportions of the White House. However, these groups do not have statutory authority to influence the design or construction of the project.
Despite the concerns from these organizations, the White House has defended its plans for the new ballroom, calling them "visionary" and stating that nearly every president who has lived in the White House has made modernizations and renovations. The administration claims that the proposed addition will provide a larger event space, citing the desire of past presidents to have more room for hosting events.
However, critics argue that the proposal is an attempt to further amplify President Trump's wealth and influence by adding a privately funded ballroom to the White House. The National Trust for Historic Preservation has called on the administration to pause demolition until plans are completed and subjected to public review processes.
 I'm low-key worried about the new ballroom addition to the White House. I mean, 90k sq ft is crazy!
 I'm low-key worried about the new ballroom addition to the White House. I mean, 90k sq ft is crazy!  It's gonna stick out like a sore thumb on that historic building. What's next, a giant movie theater?
 It's gonna stick out like a sore thumb on that historic building. What's next, a giant movie theater?  And don't even get me started on the fact that it's privately funded... seems sketchy, you know?
 And don't even get me started on the fact that it's privately funded... seems sketchy, you know?  Like, shouldn't the White House be about preserving history and culture or something?
 Like, shouldn't the White House be about preserving history and culture or something?  Not just some fancy addition to make Trump's friends feel special.
 Not just some fancy addition to make Trump's friends feel special. 

 I dont think its cool that the white house is getting another big addition
 I dont think its cool that the white house is getting another big addition  90k sq ft is huge! Its gonna change the vibe of the whole place
 90k sq ft is huge! Its gonna change the vibe of the whole place  and what's up with ppl saying every president has modernized the wh? like, no
 and what's up with ppl saying every president has modernized the wh? like, no  my grandma's old house still looks the same
 my grandma's old house still looks the same  its not about making it modern or whatever its about preserving history
 its not about making it modern or whatever its about preserving history 

 think its just a fancy way to add more opulence 2 the white house like who needs that kinda money
 think its just a fancy way to add more opulence 2 the white house like who needs that kinda money  . 90k sq ft? That's just too much, if u ask me
. 90k sq ft? That's just too much, if u ask me  . And what's up with the fact that it's privately funded by Trump?
. And what's up with the fact that it's privately funded by Trump?  . I'm all for modernizations, but this feels like a major overreach
. I'm all for modernizations, but this feels like a major overreach  . Can't we just stick to preserving the beauty of history instead of adding our own luxury projects?
. Can't we just stick to preserving the beauty of history instead of adding our own luxury projects? 
 .
. It's interesting to see how the administration is framing this as a necessary modernization for presidential events, but isn't it possible that there are other ways to achieve this goal without compromising the integrity of the White House?
 It's interesting to see how the administration is framing this as a necessary modernization for presidential events, but isn't it possible that there are other ways to achieve this goal without compromising the integrity of the White House?  . I'm all for modernizations, but this is just excessive. Can't they just stick to the original design or something? And another thing, why does President Trump need a new ballroom anyway? Is he planning some kind of lavish party or something?
. I'm all for modernizations, but this is just excessive. Can't they just stick to the original design or something? And another thing, why does President Trump need a new ballroom anyway? Is he planning some kind of lavish party or something?  It's just not right, you know? The National Trust for Historic Preservation should keep pushing for this pause until it's all figured out
 It's just not right, you know? The National Trust for Historic Preservation should keep pushing for this pause until it's all figured out 
 . And can we talk about how "visionary" this plan sounds? Like, every president ever has made changes to the White House for good reason... except maybe that one time when they painted the walls blue
. And can we talk about how "visionary" this plan sounds? Like, every president ever has made changes to the White House for good reason... except maybe that one time when they painted the walls blue  .
.