The article discusses the growing threat of drone attacks in Europe, particularly from Russia and its allies. The European Union is planning to build a defensive drone wall to protect its member states from these attacks. However, experts warn that building such a wall would be expensive and potentially ineffective, as new counter-drone measures are constantly being developed.
Instead, some experts suggest targeting the bases launching the drones themselves, rather than just defending against them. This approach would require coordination between NATO and other countries to identify and attack the sources of drone attacks.
The article also notes that building a drone wall is not without its challenges, including the need for significant investment in new technologies and infrastructure, as well as potential concerns about the impact on regional stability and security.
Overall, the article suggests that while a defensive drone wall may provide some protection against drone attacks, it is just one part of a broader strategy to address this growing threat.
Instead, some experts suggest targeting the bases launching the drones themselves, rather than just defending against them. This approach would require coordination between NATO and other countries to identify and attack the sources of drone attacks.
The article also notes that building a drone wall is not without its challenges, including the need for significant investment in new technologies and infrastructure, as well as potential concerns about the impact on regional stability and security.
Overall, the article suggests that while a defensive drone wall may provide some protection against drone attacks, it is just one part of a broader strategy to address this growing threat.
. I mean, think about all the tech that's gonna be needed for that - sensors, cameras, AI, you name it... and what's the guarantee it'll even work? New drones with some fancy jamming tech will just find another way to get through 
. And let's not forget about the costs - we're talkin' billions of euros here, which is a pretty big chunk of change 
. Instead of just building a wall, shouldn't we be focusing on tracking down those bases launching the drones in the first place? It seems like a more targeted approach to me 
. And what about the regional stability and security concerns? That's a whole other can of worms 
...
. I think the idea of targeting the bases launching the drones is super logical - why just defend when you can also disrupt the supply chain? 
But at the same time, it's crazy expensive and requires so much coordination between countries. Like, how are they gonna make that work without creating more problems than it solves? 
. I mean, we're living in times where tech can be both amazing and super scary. Russia's been using drones to wreak havoc on EU countries, and now the EU wants to build a wall to stop them? It sounds like a classic case of playing catch-up 
.
. I mean, it's one thing to defend against drones, but what about going after the people launching them in the first place? It's a whole new level of strategic thinking 
.
. Building a drone wall sounds like a massive undertaking, not to mention the potential impact on regional stability and security 
. I'm all for staying safe, but we need to be smart about it 
.
? I'm not saying it's that easy, but come on, we've got geniuses like Edward Snowden out there showing us how it's done. And let's be real, a drone wall is just a pretty face – it's gonna cost an arm and a leg to build and maintain. What's the point of spending billions when you can just pay some smart folks (not me, obviously 
) to track down those pesky drones? I mean, I guess it's better than doing nothing, but let's not pretend like this is the most effective solution... 
)
.
.
I'm all for getting tech-savvy defense strategies in place but honestly, a physical 'drone wall' sounds like a whole lotta unnecessary hassle and expense 
. Like, can't we just focus on hacking into the drone launch sites instead? 
. Plus, it's all about coordination with NATO and other countries anyway... why make it even more complicated by throwing up a wall 
? Let's just get ahead of this tech game and find a better solution 
Anyway, I do think targeting the sources of drone attacks is a better idea – coordination between NATO and other countries could really make a difference here. It's about time we put our money where our mouth is instead of throwing up walls (literally!). 
and nato needs to step up their game too... cant let russia just swoop in with their drones and think they can get away with it 
these drone attacks r gettin more complicated by the day, like they're improvIN on the fly or somethin... instead of just throwin up a wall, we should be lookin at how to take down the ppl launchin the drones in the first place 
Maybe we should be focusing on uncovering the truth behind these attacks rather than just putting up a wall to try and block 'em out.
I'm not saying they're involved, but... it's definitely interesting.
? I think we need to get our priorities straight and focus on finding ways to stop these drones at the source 
. We need to work together as a global community to figure out a way to stop these drone attacks for good 
.
. but what if they focused on building a more robust detection system, like AI-powered radar systems that can track drones in real-time? that way they can pinpoint the source of the attack and take it down before it even gets to their borders 