HSBC's top executives faced intense questioning from shareholders on Monday, as investors increasingly call for the bank to be broken up due to perceived poor performance in other regions.
The lender's leadership defended its strategy, stating that it was working and had moved dividends upwards. However, the board unanimously opposed a resolution calling for the bank to spin off or reorganize its Asian business, citing concerns that such a move would not be in shareholders' interests.
HSBC's Asian operations are its main source of profits, and investors believe that separating them from the rest of the bank could improve performance. However, the bank's top executives argued that doing so would result in significant revenue loss due to cross-border transactions.
Chairman Mark Tucker stated that the board had previously reviewed options for restructuring the bank but concluded that alternatives would "materially destroy value" for shareholders. CEO Noel Quinn echoed this sentiment, stating that the bank was performing well as a whole and that separating its Asian business would not address underlying issues.
The lender is also facing pressure from its largest shareholder, Ping An, which holds an 8% stake in HSBC and has backed calls for the bank to rethink its structure. However, the insurance giant's views have not changed since November, when Chairman Huang Yong stated that the firm would support any initiatives that could improve the bank's performance and value.
HSBC's latest acquisition, the purchase of Silicon Valley Bank's UK arm, has also raised concerns. Critics have questioned whether the lender conducted adequate due diligence on SVB's customers before making the deal, which was completed just days after the US-based bank collapsed.
Despite these concerns, HSBC's leadership defended the acquisition, stating that it presented a good business opportunity and allowed the bank to gain hundreds of innovative startups as customers. The executives pushed back on the notion that they had not had time to carry out proper due diligence, but Tucker acknowledged that recent turmoil in the banking industry would likely have an impact on HSBC's performance.
The lender's leadership defended its strategy, stating that it was working and had moved dividends upwards. However, the board unanimously opposed a resolution calling for the bank to spin off or reorganize its Asian business, citing concerns that such a move would not be in shareholders' interests.
HSBC's Asian operations are its main source of profits, and investors believe that separating them from the rest of the bank could improve performance. However, the bank's top executives argued that doing so would result in significant revenue loss due to cross-border transactions.
Chairman Mark Tucker stated that the board had previously reviewed options for restructuring the bank but concluded that alternatives would "materially destroy value" for shareholders. CEO Noel Quinn echoed this sentiment, stating that the bank was performing well as a whole and that separating its Asian business would not address underlying issues.
The lender is also facing pressure from its largest shareholder, Ping An, which holds an 8% stake in HSBC and has backed calls for the bank to rethink its structure. However, the insurance giant's views have not changed since November, when Chairman Huang Yong stated that the firm would support any initiatives that could improve the bank's performance and value.
HSBC's latest acquisition, the purchase of Silicon Valley Bank's UK arm, has also raised concerns. Critics have questioned whether the lender conducted adequate due diligence on SVB's customers before making the deal, which was completed just days after the US-based bank collapsed.
Despite these concerns, HSBC's leadership defended the acquisition, stating that it presented a good business opportunity and allowed the bank to gain hundreds of innovative startups as customers. The executives pushed back on the notion that they had not had time to carry out proper due diligence, but Tucker acknowledged that recent turmoil in the banking industry would likely have an impact on HSBC's performance.
. I think it's fair to say that the bank is struggling in some regions and investors are losing patience 
. If they were to spin off their Asian operations, it could potentially fix those issues and boost profits 
. But at the same time, it seems like there's a lot of concern about the impact on revenue due to cross-border transactions 
.
. And yeah, there are definitely some questions about how HSBC handled its recent acquisition of Silicon Valley Bank's UK arm 
.
. We'll just have to wait and see how things play out 
.
. I'm not saying the bank didn't do its part, but given the recent collapse of SVB, it's hard not to question whether they rushed into this deal.
. It just seems like a cop-out to me. The bank needs to acknowledge its weaknesses and address them head-on, rather than trying to sweep everything under the rug 
.
And I get it, separating Asian operations might sound good but how do we know the bank wouldn't lose more money elsewhere? 
.
.
.
. And then there's this Silicon Valley Bank acquisition - yeah, it's got everyone worried about due diligence and timelines... but still, it's a good business move, right? 
. HSBC's got some tough decisions to make, but they're not going to magically solve all their problems overnight 
. Maybe it's time to focus on the bigger picture? 
maybe they should listen... or it could b another case of bs 
their asian ops are literally their bread and butter and yet theyre not willing to make any changes to improve performance?? it just makes no sense to me, like come on mark tucker u can do better than that 
how could they not do proper due diligence on svb's customers?? its like theyre just throwing good money after bad 
i swear, hsbc is more concerned with maintaining the status quo than with actually improving things for their shareholders 
, but at what cost to the rest of the world? We're always talking about 'integration' and 'synergy', but what if that means sacrificing local businesses for the sake of shareholders? 
. Maybe we need to take a step back and ask ourselves, what's really at stake here? Is it just about money, or is there something more to this whole 'performance' business? 