I mean, what's up with these reforms? It feels like they're more about appeasing far-right voters than actually solving the problem . The "danger to the security of the state" clause sounds super vague and could be used to target anyone, not just actual national security threats . And 5-10 years' residency requirement for citizenship? That's already pretty strict – I'm not sure how that'll help with integration or community building . Plus, who gets left behind when these policies kick in? Low-income asylum seekers and refugees, probably . Can't we be talking about more creative solutions to address housing and public service pressures?
I mean, what's up with these reforms? It feels like they're more about appeasing far-right voters than actually solving the problem 
. The "danger to the security of the state" clause sounds super vague and could be used to target anyone, not just actual national security threats 
. And 5-10 years' residency requirement for citizenship? That's already pretty strict – I'm not sure how that'll help with integration or community building 
. Plus, who gets left behind when these policies kick in? Low-income asylum seekers and refugees, probably 
. Can't we be talking about more creative solutions to address housing and public service pressures?