Lawyers, guns and money: SCOTUS considers firearms and the Federal Reserve

πŸ€” gun laws are super complicated 😬 i think we need more education on our rights and responsibilities πŸ“š meanwhile, the fed is like, totally independent πŸ™…β€β™‚οΈ don't wanna see trump messing with that πŸ’Έ justices seem torn about the bruen precedent πŸ€·β€β™€οΈ maybe they're thinking too much about history πŸ•°οΈ but one thing's for sure: gun laws need to be fair and reasonable for everyone πŸ”«πŸ‘
 
πŸ€” I'm worried about where all this is going. I mean, guns and politicians already seem super divisive, but adding the Federal Reserve into the mix just seems like too much power for one person to wield. It feels like we're playing with fire here - literally and figuratively. What if Trump's attempts to control the Fed somehow lead to a financial crisis? That's a risk I don't think we can afford. And on top of that, Hawaii's gun law is already so reasonable... it just doesn't seem right that we're spending all this energy fighting about it. Can't we just find some common ground and move forward? 😐
 
πŸ€” Supreme Court's decisions lately are like, soooo dramatic! I mean, one day you're talking about gun laws and how they've changed over time, and the next you're dealing with this whole Federal Reserve thing πŸ€‘. It's like, can't we just have a calm conversation about it for once? πŸ˜‚ But seriously, I think Justice Ketanji Brown Jackson is totally on point when she says that the Bruen test might be flawed πŸ€·β€β™€οΈ. I mean, it's not like we're just talking about gun laws here; we're talking about people's lives and freedoms πŸ’₯. And what really gets me is how Trump is trying to fire a Fed member πŸ‘Š. Like, come on, man! Can't you see that would be a huge power grab? πŸ˜’
 
Back
Top