Federal Judge Slams DOJ's Probe Approach in James Comey Case
A federal judge has dealt a blow to the Justice Department's (DOJ) investigation into former FBI director James Comey by rejecting another early motion from the prosecution team. The decision, which was made last week and again on Monday, questions the approach taken by Lindsey Halligan-led prosecutors, who lack prior prosecutorial experience.
The DOJ had sought an expedited ruling on how potentially sensitive evidence is processed through a filter protocol, citing concerns that it could inform a potential conflict of interest for Comey's defense team. However, U.S. District Judge Michael Nachmanoff rejected the motion, suggesting that any undue delay was caused by the government itself.
Nachmanoff noted that the DOJ had failed to seek guidance on the filter protocol until October 13, despite having the materials at issue in their possession for several years. He also pointed out that the report forming the basis for the DOJ's claim about Comey's representation was public knowledge since its publication in 2019.
The judge's decision raises questions about the DOJ's approach to the investigation and whether Halligan's team is following best practices. Comey has argued that his prosecution is selective and vindictive, and the DOJ will respond to those claims next month.
The rejection of the expedited ruling on the filter protocol is a significant development in the case, which is still in its early stages. It suggests that the judge may be skeptical of Halligan's approach and that the government has some work to do to build a strong case against Comey.
As the investigation continues, it remains to be seen how this decision will impact the prosecution's strategy and whether the DOJ will be able to overcome these setbacks. For now, it appears that Halligan's team still faces an uphill battle in proving their case against the former FBI director.
A federal judge has dealt a blow to the Justice Department's (DOJ) investigation into former FBI director James Comey by rejecting another early motion from the prosecution team. The decision, which was made last week and again on Monday, questions the approach taken by Lindsey Halligan-led prosecutors, who lack prior prosecutorial experience.
The DOJ had sought an expedited ruling on how potentially sensitive evidence is processed through a filter protocol, citing concerns that it could inform a potential conflict of interest for Comey's defense team. However, U.S. District Judge Michael Nachmanoff rejected the motion, suggesting that any undue delay was caused by the government itself.
Nachmanoff noted that the DOJ had failed to seek guidance on the filter protocol until October 13, despite having the materials at issue in their possession for several years. He also pointed out that the report forming the basis for the DOJ's claim about Comey's representation was public knowledge since its publication in 2019.
The judge's decision raises questions about the DOJ's approach to the investigation and whether Halligan's team is following best practices. Comey has argued that his prosecution is selective and vindictive, and the DOJ will respond to those claims next month.
The rejection of the expedited ruling on the filter protocol is a significant development in the case, which is still in its early stages. It suggests that the judge may be skeptical of Halligan's approach and that the government has some work to do to build a strong case against Comey.
As the investigation continues, it remains to be seen how this decision will impact the prosecution's strategy and whether the DOJ will be able to overcome these setbacks. For now, it appears that Halligan's team still faces an uphill battle in proving their case against the former FBI director.