US Secretary of State Marco Rubio's long-sought victory over Venezuelan President Nicolas Maduro has come at a high cost, leaving the top diplomat with a far cry from his idealized vision of Western democracy and human rights abroad. The administration's hardline approach to Latin America, backed by Rubio, has led to the ousting of Maduro but has not achieved its stated goals.
Rubio's path to success relied heavily on leveraging competing interests within the Trump administration, including those of President Donald Trump himself. He effectively pushed for a policy that aligned with his own hawkish views, which have long supported maximum-pressure sanctions campaigns and various forms of US intervention in toppling governments.
However, Rubio now finds himself navigating the complexities of working closely with Maduro's former deputy Delcy Rodriguez, who is a staunch supporter of the Chavista movement. Elections remain a distant prospect, with Trump preferring to focus on opening Venezuela's nationalized oil industry for US access rather than pursuing regime change.
Rubio has struggled to sell the narrative that Maduro's abduction was not a bid for power but an act of law enforcement, as he now works closely with figures like Rodriguez and security czar Diosdado Cabello. His efforts may be seen as shallow attempts at spin, with Lee Schlenker from Quincy Institute for Responsible Statecraft labeling Rubio's rhetoric "lying through his teeth."
Rubio's future prospects remain uncertain, particularly when it comes to addressing Cuba, an issue on which he still holds a deep-seated anti-communist stance. Unlike Venezuela, the situation with Cuba is seen as less appealing to Trump and many of his allies, who are wary of engaging in another costly military adventure.
In the end, Rubio's victory may prove pyrrhic, leaving him with a fragile hold on influence within the administration.
Rubio's path to success relied heavily on leveraging competing interests within the Trump administration, including those of President Donald Trump himself. He effectively pushed for a policy that aligned with his own hawkish views, which have long supported maximum-pressure sanctions campaigns and various forms of US intervention in toppling governments.
However, Rubio now finds himself navigating the complexities of working closely with Maduro's former deputy Delcy Rodriguez, who is a staunch supporter of the Chavista movement. Elections remain a distant prospect, with Trump preferring to focus on opening Venezuela's nationalized oil industry for US access rather than pursuing regime change.
Rubio has struggled to sell the narrative that Maduro's abduction was not a bid for power but an act of law enforcement, as he now works closely with figures like Rodriguez and security czar Diosdado Cabello. His efforts may be seen as shallow attempts at spin, with Lee Schlenker from Quincy Institute for Responsible Statecraft labeling Rubio's rhetoric "lying through his teeth."
Rubio's future prospects remain uncertain, particularly when it comes to addressing Cuba, an issue on which he still holds a deep-seated anti-communist stance. Unlike Venezuela, the situation with Cuba is seen as less appealing to Trump and many of his allies, who are wary of engaging in another costly military adventure.
In the end, Rubio's victory may prove pyrrhic, leaving him with a fragile hold on influence within the administration.